Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Poll: Raketenwerfer Change28 Aug 2019, 11:20 AM Imo there is no reason for different cemo behaviour between Soviet and OKW camo ATGs. The mechnics used should be the same. In addition the unit needs faster reaction time, some times a vehicle pass by and the unit does not even fire. Needs an veternacy overhaul and some bonuses when in garrison. In: Lobby
Thread: Economy from 1vs1 to 4vs428 Aug 2019, 11:13 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2019, 21:47 PMelchino7 Ontopic: sounds decent but i don't know how you are supposed to implement it ingame and how. One could add a single button either on base or on last tier building that would allow certain CP value for certain resources. Could even be locked behind tech. Jump back to quoted post28 Aug 2019, 05:32 AMRoastinGhost By far the simplest solution is to speed up CP gain based on the number of players. It can be done with an extremely easy setting change. Using the same multipliers, you can also change resource gain, but I don't think 4v4 players want a slower game. I have made a similar suggestion years ago. On the other hand this suggestion give the player the option to get access to units earlier and in way gives call in unit a "cost" In: Lobby
Thread: Economy from 1vs1 to 4vs427 Aug 2019, 20:08 PM One of the main differences across modes is the relationship between CP and Tech. In small games ones gain CP faster and tech slower while in large games one gain CP slower but techs faster. This difference makes timing abilities difficult. As a solution one could add the option to the player to spend resources to buy CP. That would could help with the timing of super heavies. In: Lobby
Thread: UKF September patch discussion27 Aug 2019, 08:16 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2019, 07:39 AMSupport Sapper I think Make it suppress and AA more reliable, increase traverse speed and improved tracking will make it viable without make it have to shred everything. As I have suggested for OKW AA I would try 2 firing modes. One suppress does little damage One does no suppression but has higher damage Thus user has his own input. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: UKF September patch discussion27 Aug 2019, 07:24 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2019, 06:22 AMSupport Sapper So a 15 fuel tech, 30 fuel buil emplacement is supposed to be countered by Volk only? I can see that the gun fire rate now match its animations and i'm not against that but its performance is horrible now. At the very least it should suppress the squad that trying to close in, but it was not, some time it suppress after the flame nade was out, some time is didn't suppress at all. well you seem to be right there seems to be a big reduction in DPS 68.1 55.8 43.5 37.5 33.6 38.2 31.3 24.4 21.0 18.8 Its probably too much. I did have time to check in cheat but I read somewhere it mostly done animation reason. Will edit. Thanks! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: UKF September patch discussion27 Aug 2019, 06:12 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2019, 05:56 AMSupport Sapper I do some further test with the bofor 1.2, now i can move a Volk straight in and toss a flame nade then retreat with 3-4 model, i did it 3,4 time in a row until the bofor is destroyed in cheat mod with fow on. I see why most axis player said bofor 1.2 is solid change. The change is supposed to be so that gun and animation are in sync not to change the Performance of the weapon. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet September patch discussion27 Aug 2019, 02:32 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2019, 02:25 AMAcidfreak .... You never ses drops of fg24 or g43 if we compare upgradeable weapon upgrades. Thanks for the feedback. On the other hand it seems you are stretching to find bias every where...conscript's SVT and PPsh do not drop either... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW tips?27 Aug 2019, 02:20 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2019, 01:42 AMGearBlade654 I plan to pick up OKW for my Axis main after some more time with playing the Soviets. Currently my favorite doctrine is the Grand Offensive due to Panzer Fusiliers, but from what I see of OKW it most certainly doesn't share the same playstyle as the Soviets. Any basic OKW tips, and favorite doctrine? Panzer Fusiliers are currently not cost efficient... In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: UKF September patch discussion27 Aug 2019, 02:05 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2019, 01:40 AMHon3ynuts It seems like thats the intention though. Tommies with double bren are good later, but Tommies early game are unstoppable early vs grens and volks. Tommie vet doesn't keep pace later though and they come back down to earth compared to other infantry units. By forcing earlier Upgrades a brit player sacrifices AEC timing, section upgrades smoke, mines ect. and will ultimately make it harder to spam tommies as effectively One can lower damage to 12 adjust ROF/Accuracy and better design the performance of the squad. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet September patch discussion27 Aug 2019, 02:00 AM Soviets Support Weapon Kampaneya This a step in the wrong direction. Can we stop messing with faction desing and stop making evrything avaialble to all faction? (the same way Ostheer tech become cheaper and soon OKW will have to also?) Suggestions: If T2 becomes cheaper then PTRS and satchel charges should be locked behind tech. For instance PTRS and AT satchel behind AT grenades (and mutally exclusives) and Sacthel behind molotovs or there could be a new tech called explosives giving acces to satchels and demolision charges. Maxim Seems good. Requires more testing. Suggestions: Reduce flame grenades by 5 or move to SP. That can solve halve the issues of maxims without any buff to the unit. Conscripts 7th man upgrade Changes in good direction might need fine tuning. Conscript can become decent by investing on them. It seem to require only T4 currently Combat Engineers Solid changes ZiS-3 and SU-76 76mm HE Barrage Solid changes. Suggestions: Check that Su-76 barrage damage does not improve with veterancy making more lethal. Guards Rifle ‘Hit The Dirt!’ Ability Solid changes. Guards are too powerful for an all around unit. Suggestions: 1) Reduce the PTRS accuracy to Penal, make the ability timed that increases accuracy to current level. (add the same ability to AT tommies and make spawn as 5 men even without Bolster) 2) Make the button affect work even if guards move Conscript Assault Package The change promote blobbing. Suggestions: This doctrinal should not promote blobbing lock this upgrade behind tech. In addition remove hit the ground from the ability there is little reason for these 2 abilities to come as package since they serve different roles. Shocktroopers decent changes. Suggestions: unit is too powerful. Suggestions: Remove armor and add as timed ability. KV-1 Unit is simply too cost efficient compared to PzIV H it is far more cost efficient. Suggestion: Since CE got repair speed replace received damage modifier with HP Overhaul veterancy bonus and give armor and HP bonus Rethink hull-down bonuses the ROF at vet 3 would probably be bellow 3 secs Tone down the mgs they are too powerful compared to other tanks Lower rear armor Increase price of T34/85 the units is too cost efficient Increase near penetration IS-2 As other Super heavies delay arrival keep CP lowering Fuel Partisan Troops Unit is cost efficient. Suggestions: Remove Frag grenade make molotov available without upgrade Allow merge Partisan Tank Hunters Unit is cost efficient. Suggestion: Remove Shreck and vet penetration bonus on shreck. Unit start with AT grenade unlock but on cool-down has to buy Shreck. Reduce target size. Reduce cost slightly Allow merge KV-2 As other Super heavies delay arrival keep CP lowering Fuel Defensive Tactics Good changes Suggestions: Add sandbags for C.E. Reduce target size for tanks trap increase built change cover to yellow increase built of mines for conscripts 1.2 Airborne Guards Value probably too low since it is the same drop rate as Guards who have 4 weapons instead of 3. Maybe 0.2? In: COH2 Balance