|
The Ostheer fatality "Shrouded Bombing Run" calls in a pair of planes; one drops smoke, the second drops a bomb. Problem is, the second plane is a Soviet IL-2. |
|
The Sturmtiger treatment is the way to go. Spread out the damage, add more effects.
I revamped the B4 that way for my first Commander set mod. I lowered the damage to 580, added suppression and vehicle stun effects, spread out the AoE damage, lowered direct fire cost, increased accuracy. It's really great now. |
|
If Time on Target had a reduced delay before landing, it would be more useful against moving targets without being easier to use against emplacements.
Since it has a very small spread of shells, it would still be possible to move units out of the way. |
|
An armor increase for it would be nice. Right now, it has 110 vs the regular P4's 180. The centaur and cromwell have the same armor, for instance (though the centaur is much slower).
I'd like to see what happens if it's bumped up to 140 or so. That would give it a small chance of deflecting Bazookas, so it would improve AI performance, but it still mostly helps against low-pen units like T-70s.
|
|
I agree that big game balance is pretty hit-or-miss, but I would support scaling some things for game size.
For instance, faster CP gain for larger games, since it tends to be slower there. Maybe 15% for 3v3, 30% for 4v4.
Caches should also become more expensive with more teammates. Could go up from like 150 or 200 to 350. |
|
It's disappointing that the Soviets are getting another commander that relies on elite infantry call-ins. 2/3rds of their commanders are already like that, and it's not very interesting. |
You and I both know those tests are bonkers.
Another huge deal, imo, is that Paras and Obers can fire their MGs on the move. I don't think squads trading shots at max range in cover without moving is very accurate to how firefights work in the game. DPS charts and effective health is good enough for me. |
are you sure that +3% accuracy is any relevant on them? Their cover bonus is +300% accuracy, so their base acc must be so horrible that 3% do nothing
The base accuracy doesn't matter; it's a 3% improvement, and accuracy bonuses are usually multiplied together too. |
|
I think it would be fair if low-suppression MGs had better suppression at close-mid range. That way, it's harder to attack them frontally, but they still don't shut down large portions of the battlefield like the high-suppression MGs. |
|
Something to consider is that JLI and Pathfinder snipers have only .1 accuracy on the move. If they're forced to move around, their best asset is gone.
If they still need to be nerfed, I would look at the performance of their other rifles, because that's what keeps them protected when the sniper isn't in position. If they had grenadier performance at range, volks performance up close, and maybe more movement penalties, bad JLI play would be easier to punish.
For a pathfinder buff, increasing the moving accuracy to .25 would go a long way. |
Relic Entertainment
Talisman 
|GB| The HS H[oo]ligan 
RedT3rror 
Dzaraa 
RUKAclNoggano 
