Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: One click delete your squad12 Jun 2020, 09:45 AM Can we lower the level of toxicity in this thread pls? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SU-76 - A Slight Adjustment12 Jun 2020, 09:34 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Jun 2020, 08:09 AMOsinyagov AFAIK 15 degrees for both sides. Thanks for info. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 5man grens OP?12 Jun 2020, 07:45 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Jun 2020, 05:06 AMthedarkarmadillo Thoughts on making it a native ability? Ambush and sprint should not bundle in the first place. And ST do not need sprint. With it they can even be used aggressively instead of stay in ambush sprinting to enemy and then turning on "tactical advance". The whole ambush/sprint probably started from misconception. Relic probably experimented with knifes for commandos so they give them sprint so they can move at melee range. When it was abandoned the sprint stayed as a leftover and then someone decided instead of replacing with something else to make it "feature" and give them a speed bonus further reducing the reaction time of the opponent. So no sprint and ambush should not even be combined in the first place. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SU-76 - A Slight Adjustment12 Jun 2020, 06:56 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Jun 2020, 23:43 PMthedarkarmadillo Firing cone to 5 would certainly help. Any idea why it was so much lower? Think it does not have animation for the gun, and if I remember correctly in real life the gun did not have horizontal traverse either. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 5man grens OP?11 Jun 2020, 17:36 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Jun 2020, 17:26 PMgrammar ... But if stormtroopers actually do need a durability buff, they should get something that makes them extra durable without having more men. Stormtroopers' small squad size visually reinforces the idea that they are a stealthy ambush unit that surprise the enemy to avoid taking damage. Giving them five men weakens their identity. Problem is that CQB with 4 entities and spread DPS are not good. If they drop a model early their loose too much DPS. In addition they can easily be killed when retreat from behind enemy lines where they are supposed to operate. By comparison Commandos that are also an "ambush" unit have 5 entities and drop smoke on retreat with vet. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 5man grens OP?11 Jun 2020, 16:09 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Jun 2020, 15:59 PMSerrith ... Think AEgion has a valid point since ST MP-40 sort of overlap with PG with camo. The main difference being the ability to infiltrate. They could be redesigned to offer something different. 4 men CQB unit is not a good design to begin with. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tiger nerf11 Jun 2020, 15:22 PM Maybe one could redesign all these heavy/super heavy tank and make them have lower base stats but superior vet bonuses. That would redact form their shock value but reward good unit preservation. For instance if one lower the base armor of KT lets to 300 but got 5% armor for each vet level. That would allowed the penetration of allied TD to be reduce and a vetted KT to have similar armor once fully vetted. (One would probably have to lower the XP value of the unit). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ram + Offmap combo needs to be nerfed11 Jun 2020, 13:52 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Jun 2020, 13:18 PMKyle Maybe Elefant doctrine shouldn't have Stuka bomb drop and both ISU-152 doctrine will also get rid of IL2 bombing run. But the question is: if we remove them that what are we gonna replace with? Depend how much one want to nerf the commanders. For Jaeger one can replace it with : Light artillery barrage Incendiary bombing run (that needs to be look at anyway) breakthrough equipment Stuka anti infatry strafe Antitankgun Ambush tactics (similar to Soviets) Relief infatry (that could use some changes) For Soviets Advance fortifications Reckon overflight Incendiary artillery M-42 ATG Fear propaganda (?) IL-2 strafe run (not loiter) Rapid conscription (that could see some changes) A smoke barrage In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Please explain this....11 Jun 2020, 12:57 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Jun 2020, 12:43 PMSneakEye It is true about almost all structures. The emplacements are a small exception, those always have 5 armor and have a 2x damage modifier while under construction. Jump back to quoted post11 Jun 2020, 12:48 PMAngrade (Ægion) Some times they naturally have 0 Armor when building and then upon completion they get their armor. Other times they have armor, then the armor is removed, then upon completion they get their armor back. Received damage multipliers are common during and after construction as well. Mines are simple, they have armor at all times. Thanks for the clarification guys. I was suspecting that there was no 0 armor rule applying to everything as claimed and that "ghosts" have different properties than the structure itself. Since mines have 35 armor even when being built the scenario of taking damage from small arm fire is unlikely, so the mine "dying/exploding" from canceling the "ghost" at the last second seems more probable. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Please explain this....11 Jun 2020, 12:21 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Jun 2020, 12:12 PMKatitof Any structure that is being built has 0 armor, but unfinished mines do not explode. Have you checked the actual stats of all "ghosts" or are you just guessing? And it seem a little odd since the lower value usually used is 1 and not 0. I would expect UKF emplacement to take allot more damage during construction if it was true. In: COH2 Bugs