Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Aireborn Guard are useless14 Aug 2020, 15:04 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Aug 2020, 13:46 PMSolcastel With DP28. It should give slow tank ability, but it doesn't and I don't understand why Aireborns can get DP28 for 100 ammo and no new ability. PPSH cost 0 ammo and unblocks 3 abilities (smoke, 2 combat tactics). DP28 cost 100 ammo, and unblock NOTHING Is there an explication ? So your theory is that Airborne Guards are useless because they do not have an ability when upgrade with 3 DPs? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is the WC 51 overperforming ? 13 Aug 2020, 17:24 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Aug 2020, 17:02 PMBetterDead ThanRed Vipper. regarding the 50cal upgrade on the wc51, do you mean you cannot carry squads anymore? do that and wc51 seems alot less tempting to use. wc51 has a limited usage early game unless you go 2-3+, it needs to be good for those 5+ minutes until axis goes 222/rak/PZgrens+zooks/pak40. like the flare ability No. I mean that the HMG is automatically maned when it is carrying a passenger and passenger can still fire as normal. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is the WC 51 overperforming ? 13 Aug 2020, 16:32 PM I would test the following: Cost the same or even a slight decrease Now has shared veterancy Can now fire flares Crew removed/mark target removed/155 barrage removed Range to 35 Gun upgrade removed passenger automatically crew HMG Passengers do not die on destruction only suppressed maybe take some damage Can now be "Withdraw and Refit" for a M3 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why should a Panzer IV be able to take on a Jackson?13 Aug 2020, 12:25 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Aug 2020, 11:53 AMKatitof Why? TDs are stronger, incomparably more expensive, mobile ATGs. ATGs don't struggle with penning meds. If you are going to quote me at least read what you are quoting before responding. This is what I wrote: "The idea that TDs should be able to damage (hit and penetrate)" In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why should a Panzer IV be able to take on a Jackson?13 Aug 2020, 11:20 AM The idea that TDs should be able to damage (hit and penetrate) mediums tanks at range 60 with 100% chance is simply flawed. Especially the ones that are mobile and have a turret. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: State of OKW in the meta 12 Aug 2020, 10:53 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Aug 2020, 09:36 AMKatitof So, probably as vipper would suggest, to see more of BG HQ we need to nerf mechanized. Lets try to stick to what Vipper has actually posted and not guess. And what Vipper has said is that after USF had a tech revamp OKW are going to need one also. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is the WC 51 overperforming ? 11 Aug 2020, 18:23 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Aug 2020, 17:18 PMEsxile You're full of assumption here. 1- I didn't see you a lot asking to remove the TA when is was OP, double standard?. Anyway the barrage is good but not OP, I pointed out that Relic never removed an iconic and "end-game" ability from a doctrine and probably vetoed its removal when Mr.Smith revamped the doctrine. Having it on the jeep is already a nerf compared with what it was before: You didn't need pay for a 200mp squishy unit to deliver it, you only needed vision and munition at that time. ... Your assumption is simply wrong. The 155 barrage was removed in the early stages of testing and Relic did not veto anything. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is the WC 51 overperforming ? 11 Aug 2020, 14:23 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Aug 2020, 13:21 PMEsxile Quoted from you, you say the WC51 is OP and use the number of time it has been used during a tournament as an argument. By the same argument so are 5men grens. The unit is OP but not because it has been used in a tournament, that is simply an indication and answer to those who claim that the commander is useless. I am not sure why you keep bringing up the 5 men grenadiers, if in your opinion they are OP start a thread about. We can debate anything you like about them there but not in thread about a vehicle like the WC51. Jump back to quoted post11 Aug 2020, 13:21 PMEsxile You have no evidence that the WC51 is OP other than your vision of the unit. You can throw list every abilities it had, that doesn't make them an argument. Well it is not just me saying that is Op, it is a large portion of people posting here (including at lest one allied biased user. see post 102) I am not sure what qualifies as "evidence" in your eyes but the abilities the unit comes with is actually an argument. This debate seem to have taken a slippery road which I am not willing to follow. Feel free to present any arguments why in your opinion it is not OP instead of playing the "you said" game. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is the WC 51 overperforming ? 11 Aug 2020, 12:01 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Aug 2020, 11:43 AMKatitof Teeeechnically, veteran squad leader provides much more, affecting 3 completely different squads and enhancing their strengths and giving them doctrinal abilities(repair on non engineers IS a doctrinal ability since day 1). Availability is also factor on the impact of doctrinal ability and last time I've checked, people build noticeably more grens, PGs and pios over the course of single game then they build dodge trucks. This thread is about WC51 try to stay on topic, if in your opinion VSL is op as an ability feel free to start a thread about it. If in you opinion the WC51 is not OP feel free to explain why. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is the WC 51 overperforming ? 11 Aug 2020, 11:56 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Aug 2020, 11:35 AMEsxile That wasn't your argument about the WC51 on your last post and this last one doesn't make sense anyway. In this thread there have been clear arguments why WC51 is OP even in first post of the thread. Comparing units like 5 men grenadiers and Ostruppen with WC51 makes not sense, you can compare the abilities thou and that is what I compared. If you do not like my arguments read the arguments others have already posted including OP. WC51 is simply OP. In: COH2 Balance