Profile of SkysTheLimit

I précised by saying STATS at gun that is a fact

With AP rounds activated the m1 has better Stats. You're wrong

the sniper stun the brumbar as it's an assault gun , which is very powerful (was removed in all unit even the pak 40 has a nerfed version of the stun)

It's a turret jam, not a stun. The pak40 crit is completely different

piat RE squad are a 5 men 2 piat with snare engineer squad, so on that part we are clear

Jesus Christ yes. All I'm saying is conscripts and Riflemen are going to be more numerous than fucking Royal engineers. Zooks on Riflemen have snare, ptrs penals have snare, guards have snare....

yes brummabr does not counter tanks but late game u move with ur tanks as they dictate the game late, in late game they are as much mobile as osther

Can you please fucking read? I'm comparing them to USF and Sov, they are MUCH more static than USF and Sovs

I am comparing the performance of the 3 allies against the Brum......

u forgot that ukf have crit sniper, best at gun stats and piats , if u want even AEC has it has decent pen (like puma)

Didn't forget anything, I wasn't listing every single source of AT.... You know that the sniper can't engine crit the Brumbarr right? Only light vehicles? Even if it could, conscripts and Riflemen everywhere will still mean more snares

AEC/Puma are great, if you're relying on them to kill Brum/Dozer in team games, then that's not gonna go well for you.

And wrong, they do not have the best AT gun. US M1 is much better, ESPECIALLY against Brum. You can extend the range and have better pen, costs Muni sure but it's by far better than the 6 lber

TDs are the main thing that's going to be fighting it, and SU85 and Jackson are both better than Firefly

while yes they do have a more static game play that is only in the early game, late game they have 2 very mobile tanks and generally a more mobile style similar to osther

Brumbarr doesn't counter tanks... If your brumbarr is soloing a Comet you did something wrong. BTW everyone has mobile tanks... Is the panther slow? Jackson? T34/85 or 76?

And an SU85 kicks it's ass, but is not that mobile. You don't need great mobility to kill a casemate

Brits infantry is static the entire game, which is what the brumbarr is shooting at. No one's saying it dominates them, it's just better against them than USF or Sovs. It's really not that controversial of a statement....

Regarding the mortar itself:
-Cost should go down to 310mp and 8 popcap.

+1

Which the last tournament proved wrong as even said skilled players avoided tier 4 like the plague

Well you don't need t4 to call in a tiger (non-ACE variant), just bp3. Probably has something to do with it. Tiger was built more often than all t4 units combined

You're also not gonna build a brumbarr when heavy tanks are dominating the meta. A) Tiger kills infantry more reliably, while also being great against tanks B) brum won't help you fight against an IS2/Pershing

That leaves out the fact that the Brum is probably best against the Brits, who nobody used. I think its strongest against them of the 3 because:
A) they don't have a heavy in the same "class" as the other 4 factions
B) fewer snares than US and Sovs.
C) They are BY FAR the most static of the 3 allied factions
D) the Firefly is the easiest to counter of the 3 allied TDs (D is my personal opinion, so I could be wrong)

if this is true why we didn't see tier 4 in last tournament?

Did you even read the whole post you quoted? Half the time he was talking about team games

And then there's the fact that the tourney was a tiny sample size, the skill difference between players, the limited map pool

But again, you don't care. They play one mode and play on less than 1/3 the maps in the mode and and you still somehow keep using it to make claims about single fucking units. Try something else