Profile of SkysTheLimit

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: State of Heavies18 Jan 2020, 23:08 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Jan 2020, 22:54 PMIncendiaryRounds Wrong. The secondary cannon is more than enough to penetrate a p4 at close and medium range. An absolute lie btw. The 45mm has 80 penetration at midrange. P4 has 180 armor, 230 at vet2. More than enough = <50%??? But this misses the point. I have already said they should also nerf rear armor of KVs and Churchill.... Do you have a point? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: State of Heavies18 Jan 2020, 23:01 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Jan 2020, 22:54 PMIncendiaryRounds Wrong. The secondary cannon is more than enough to penetrate a p4 at close and medium range. When you're flanking a KV8 with a p4, the rear of the p4 is also exposed to the KV8 most of the time, hence the secondary cannon is getting a decent # of rear armor shots. LOL I said it poses no threat, not that it can't damage the p4. The secondary gun is terrible, if you lose your p4 to that you have no one to blame but yourself If a t34 gets lost to a brumbarr it should be just as embarrassed. Do you have point? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: State of Heavies18 Jan 2020, 22:44 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Jan 2020, 22:43 PMdistrofio Why the game includes snares? Did you ever notice that tanks are faster than footmen? Imagine a big F cannon (namely ATG) traversed by raw manpower? Do you understand that mobility is another aspect of units and is as important as every other one? Did you ever read a M36 vs panther thread? Do you know why they are not nerfed? Because they are both fast, that gives them their advantage. Now aswer kindly to me, is T34 a slow tank like a KV1 or is it fast like a T70... The answer will lead you to my point and why a T34 can pen the back of a brumbarr... Dude I have no idea wtf you're talking about. Do you disagree with me? I can't even tell... You think some tanks should deflect shots that hit them in the rear? Which ones? Why? At what range? Idk why youre talking about tanks being faster than infantry. I'm aware. What does that have to do with rear armor??? Stop jumping all over the place In: COH2 Balance
Thread: State of Heavies18 Jan 2020, 22:14 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Jan 2020, 21:44 PMdistrofio I said KV tanks, not only KV8. KV1 / KV2 are more than a threat to a Pz4. Even those two last have high rear armor for a P4 to score pen shots. Do not turn upside down my arguments and put words in my mouth, i said both things, a proper played brumbar will not show a rear shot to anything but T34s being so cheap are able to dive through hell and back to get a rear shot, even more if you certainly know that will pen. Now you want to add another setup just to twist my wordings. Please abstain from that unless you really know what you do. ATGs are always present in a normal skill game but you know very well that ATGs are the slowest, then brumbarrs and the fastest of them 3 is the t34, imagine taking a ATG everywhere you send your stupa just because some pesky t34, wich you cant hit nor damage is always going to get behind BECAUSE IT SCORES PEN SHOTS. NONESENSE I really don't understand what you're trying to say here man. The extent of my point: Rear armor of any tank should never deflect shots coming from something larger than a t70. Regardless of faction, regardless of units. If it's larger than a t70, it should always penetrate rear armor in my opinion If you disagree, please explain more clearly. If you don't, great. I wasn't even trying to twist your words or start a debate. I was just trying to clarify my point/understand yours. Please calm down Jump back to quoted post18 Jan 2020, 21:44 PMdistrofio ATGs support but are nowhere neccesary to enable a LATEGAME AI SPECIALIST TANK... I literally said ALL mediums expose themselves to ATGs with a flank, not just t34 against brumbarr. I said nothing even remotely close to "you should have an AT gun behind every brumbarr". I just said flanking is risky no matter what you're fighting against Idk why you're talking about t34 speed? There's a reason AT guns have 60 range and tanks have 35 Jump back to quoted post18 Jan 2020, 21:35 PMthedarkarmadillo Well yes, but also no. You start like that and your still going to have whining because axis rear would have to be lower to accommodate the t34, which means even the T70 would have an alright chance. Yeah I'm not saying everything above t70 should have 100% and t70 should have 0%. Just that the cutoff for 100% should be above the t70 The health of things like the t70 already insures that flanking a tank with it won't go well In: COH2 Balance
Thread: State of Heavies18 Jan 2020, 21:19 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Jan 2020, 18:03 PMthedarkarmadillo The KV-2 could probably afford to lose some ass armour but the other 2 are less of an issue imo. Not design wise, balance wise or least of all historically,not that the latter matters so much but as a factor it checks out I'm not saying its a huge issue, my entire point is that I don't see a reason for ANY unit to deflect shots that hit its rear armor You can qualify the scenarios however you like, all I'm saying is rear armor shouldn't deflect tank shots, no matter what the scenario. I dont really care whether one is "less of an issue", rear armor simply shouldn't be deflecting shots from anything larger than a t70 imo In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Are Ass Grens too good??18 Jan 2020, 18:59 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Jan 2020, 18:37 PMIncendiaryRounds Actually if u read my thread about Brum overnerfed you'll see that I wanted nerfs to the original OP Brum - just a range nerf. So you're full of bs again, SkyTheLiar. https://www.coh2.org/topic/84336/overnerfed-brummbar-why-am-i-not-surprised Lol how did I lie? You provided one example in which you mostly complained about the HE Sherman and said that the brumbarr got nerfed too much... You literally spent one sentence agreeing with a nerf that already happened, and the rest of the thread complaining about the other ones That thread is filled with posts from people mocking you and pointing out your bias.... In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Are Ass Grens too good??18 Jan 2020, 18:25 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Jan 2020, 18:12 PMIncendiaryRounds Something only irks me if the Ost unit is SEVERELY underpowered Lol BS, you accuse the modteam of a grand conspiracy everytime they don't do exactly what you ask Jump back to quoted post18 Jan 2020, 18:12 PMIncendiaryRounds like the Brum to the point barely anyone uses it. The brumbarr is not "severely underpowered." It was just explained to you by someone who actually balances the game (sander) that it is still strong in team games Edit: Hahahaha of course you had no problem with the time that they were OP as hell. Of course. But now all of the sudden it's a gamebreaking problem that they don't delete full health squads with ease In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Are Ass Grens too good??18 Jan 2020, 17:55 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Jan 2020, 22:22 PMIncendiaryRounds Yes it does just take THAT little to trigger these allied crybabies. You are the last person who should be talking here. The slightest anti-ostheer post practically sends you to the hospital lol In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: State of Heavies18 Jan 2020, 17:34 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Jan 2020, 01:41 AMdistrofio A brumbarr hardly exposes his rear armor in normal combat, but t34s are able to overextend to get a rear hit and maybe a ram finish. Brumbarr poses no threat to t34. T34 are at least one or two tiers below brumbarr. Those reasons justify the rear armor bounces. KV on the other side is the lightest heavy tank, even when P4 have good pen, KV can outgun and kill Pz4 in 1v1. A rear armor hit is the only possible chance for a P4 to win the 1v1. Id say there is a reason for P4 to get pen shots and no reason for t34 to do so. A KV-8 poses no threat to p4. So therefore it should bounce p4 shots on the rear? I don't think so Yeah of course a brumbarr shouldn't be exposing it's rear armor. That's the entire point. If you are showing your rear you deserve to suffer for it, regardless of what tank you are using You can say a brum poses no threat to a t34, but if I'm diving my tank behind it then I'm exposing the t34 to other AT that is absolutely a threat to it. Same goes for any medium diving behind any other tank In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is the Brummbar perfectly fine?17 Jan 2020, 03:06 AM For the love of God, who cares? Again if you're trying to "match" allied trolls that is nothing but a self-own... In: COH2 Balance