I assume this listing is a comparison of different units put into a similar category and not just a random bunch of units from different factions.
I specifically said non-doctrinal TDs. Last time Elephant was non-doctrinal was around open beta in 2013. Panther is not a normal tank destroyer because of its decent "good spot trademark" anti-infantry firepower. Panther is not a better version of a stug and they perform different roles. If that were the case it would always be a good idea to replace every lost stug with a panther to perform the same role but better.
This part is once again pretty trivial since the original point is the comparison between SU76 and SU85 which is a thing that exists as a non-doctrinal unit in soviet Tier 4 structure. If you ignore that fact this discussion is of questionable use as the SU85 and its efficiency compared to SU76 is not taken to account. This has been repeated several times by now.
(And personally I wouldn't call an SU76 to a medium TD, otherwise SU85 would be a Heavy TD which its certainly not)
One SU76 vs one SU85 or a bunch of SU76 vs one SU85? Because if you had to fight any tank with one or the other, would you blindly select the SU76?
I didn't disagree with you on the fondemental of this Topic, there is an issue with the SU76 and I give my thought on what could be a good solution to solve it.
On the list I provided, maybe the PUMA isn't relevant I was including all medium stock tank destroyers. Other than that, they all share the same issue, they overperform when vetted and only the jpz4 can't be spamed.
At the end, if you decide to nerf the SU76, you'll end why two possibilities > or you use your hammer and nobody will use the unit anymore, or you don't and players will be still spamming them. And I just want to remind you that maybe spaming a certain type of unit isn't fun to play but that's a strategy like any others, you can't deny people to do it, just increase its price so it increases its downside and let people counter it more easily.