Profile of donofsandiego

Avatar Area

Offline United States
Posts: 1400

General Information
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJT-oswDRyOrhrVghT-6ZRw
Steam: 76561198157193379
Nationality:

United States
Game Name: Snaek

Signature

"And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family?..The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and... the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough...We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”

― Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn , The Gulag Archipelago 1918–1956

Show Latest Posts


Thread: Soviet partisan doctrine 11 Oct 2022, 21:00 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Oct 2022, 18:45 PMVipper Only you seem to be making more "jokes" (that are less funny and more insulting toward a specific person) than any meaningful contribution to the actual thread. Vipper I'm sure you know this already so I don't know why you're making it a point to specifically mention it, but sometimes jokes come at the expense of other people. Especially when you're making a joke about that person. Would you believe it? So are the partisan unit "middling" or "Meh" outside the commander? Partisans are indeed middling. And the combination of that with their commander makes them meh overall. - in 4v4 In: Lobby
Thread: Soviet partisan doctrine 11 Oct 2022, 16:04 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Oct 2022, 08:33 AMVipper You can laugh as much as you like but there is not real reason for you to post about it here. Vipper, you can't facts and logic someone out of making a joke. I did it because I wanted to, not because I scientifically deduced that the thread required comedic input at 9 October 2022, 23:34. And why in your opinion are meh? Because they're a middling unit trapped inside a poor commander. You know, I had ought to write a disclaimer that whenever I'm talking about a unit or commander, it's in relation to 4v4. In: Lobby
Thread: Soviet partisan doctrine 11 Oct 2022, 07:46 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Oct 2022, 06:57 AMVipper User Hannibal is quite good ta expressing his opinion and does not really need you to advocate for him. I concur. Which is why I find it so funny that you keep missing the point. Jump back to quoted post11 Oct 2022, 06:57 AMVipper Do you have anything to add to the thread that even remotely related partisans or doctrine? Sure. I think partisans are meh. In: Lobby
Thread: Soviet partisan doctrine 10 Oct 2022, 11:21 AM He already told you what he meant two different times. Whatever I say isn't going to suddenly make it any clearer to you. In: Lobby
Thread: Soviet partisan doctrine 10 Oct 2022, 11:19 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Oct 2022, 05:54 AMVipper Then, I suggest that you clarify what, in your opinion, is the point instead of making ad hominem arguements. You really can't make this stuff up In: Lobby
Thread: Guards vs Airborne Long Range9 Oct 2022, 23:45 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Aug 2022, 21:37 PMrumartinez89 I would assume using green cover allows the fight to take longer so that RNG can smooth out compared to testing several light cover battles were a lot of the fight depends on if Guards get favorable RNG with PTRS. Late to the party here but just wanted to say that your logic is somewhat flawed with this. You're correct in that it would normally cause the fight rng to even out but because of the bugged behavior of the PTRS you're really just allowing for a longer window of the PTRS being able to get a good rng roll and affecting the battle because the guards are getting the full cover bonus while the obers are taking full damage from the PTRS. From what I understand, the PTRS is no slouch when it comes to damage too. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet partisan doctrine 9 Oct 2022, 22:34 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Oct 2022, 17:47 PMVipper I proves exactly what I posted: "Their reinforcement cost is also inline with their cost of 210 (210/8=26.25)" When you say things like this Vipper I have a hard time discerning whether you are just a very convincing troll or if you just have the incredible skill of always missing the point. In: Lobby
Thread: Soviet partisan doctrine 9 Oct 2022, 22:22 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Oct 2022, 13:44 PMKatukov average coh2.org solution to balance problems: do not buff weak units, smash the LIVING SHIT out of good doctrines and DONT buff the weak doctrine *average vipper patented "anti-powercreep" solution In: Lobby
Thread: List of Vanilla Blizzard Maps?9 Oct 2022, 03:58 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Oct 2022, 23:01 PMRosbone The ones I listed are ones I know have cold tech because I either added it or tested it when we did map patches. My hint is that I put fires on all the points when I edited them for cold tech. When I added it, I was lazy and copied the SCAR code from Oka. So a maps lighting will change when you enable cold tech. They will turn to a brown hued fog, like Oka. Well thank you for the info. I'll add it to the list after I test them to make sure. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: List of Vanilla Blizzard Maps?8 Oct 2022, 21:09 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Oct 2022, 11:53 AMRosbone I dont think a list exists. You could search for "maps I always veto" or "Please delete these maps from the game" My guess is any map that has fires on the points is setup for Cold Tech. Oka, Rhzev, Dreux for sure. Novgorod if it is still in the game. LaGleize and Vielsalm are probably working. Cant recall. Nope. You might think that, but no. One asshat in the steam forums told me to "look for white maps". I guess they didn't realize there were winter maps added after cold tech was completely dropped. On top of that, some winter maps I've played on that have fire pits buildable by troops don't even seem to get blizzards at all. Hence why I specifically asked for maps that get blizzards with cold tech on In: COH2 Gameplay