Login

russian armor

Give universal carrier the 222 treatment

19 Oct 2019, 03:44 AM
#41
avatar of distrofio

Posts: 2358

If lavanades are an anti garrison tool, so are UKF pyro IS howitzer flare, just saying
19 Oct 2019, 04:06 AM
#42
avatar of Support Sapper

Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1

If lavanades are an anti garrison tool, so are UKF pyro IS howitzer flare, just saying


No deni, but i think we know which is more effective.
20 Oct 2019, 05:38 AM
#43
avatar of PanzerFutz

Posts: 97

jump backJump back to quoted post18 Oct 2019, 14:08 PMGarrett

Because OKW has so many non-doctrinal flamer units... you alles fanboys should play some axis to get a grip of the game.


No need for me to respond to the first point when so many others have done it already.

I play all factions pretty much equally so, I'm aware of the strengths and weaknesses of all of them.
20 Oct 2019, 07:19 AM
#44
avatar of NorthFireZ

Posts: 211

If lavanades are an anti garrison tool, so are UKF pyro IS howitzer flare, just saying


:huhsign:

Nani the fuck
20 Oct 2019, 17:12 PM
#45
avatar of Lago

Posts: 3260

If lavanades are an anti garrison tool, so are UKF pyro IS howitzer flare, just saying


It is. It usually destroys the garrison outright.

However, it's about as cost efficient as demo charges.

You could easily rework the Pyro Section into UKF's indirect fire unit, but at the moment it's not practical.
20 Oct 2019, 18:54 PM
#46
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17875 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post20 Oct 2019, 17:12 PMLago


It is. It usually destroys the garrison outright.

However, it's about as cost efficient as demo charges.

You could easily rework the Pyro Section into UKF's indirect fire unit, but at the moment it's not practical.

Regular grenade range of flare might have something to do with it.

British men have limp limps.
Not like the alpha male welsh sniper chad who actually can throw it longer then arms length.
20 Oct 2019, 19:48 PM
#47
avatar of Lago

Posts: 3260

jump backJump back to quoted post20 Oct 2019, 18:54 PMKatitof

Regular grenade range of flare might have something to do with it.

British men have limp limps.
Not like the alpha male welsh sniper chad who actually can throw it longer then arms length


I'm pretty sure the sniper's got less range than the Section does.

It has to sneak up to throw 'em.
20 Oct 2019, 20:12 PM
#48
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17875 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post20 Oct 2019, 19:48 PMLago


I'm pretty sure the sniper's got less range than the Section does.

It has to sneak up to throw 'em.

Specifically because he is a sniper he gets 35 range.
Sections have 10 or less.
20 Oct 2019, 20:17 PM
#49
avatar of BlueKnight

Posts: 320

jump backJump back to quoted post20 Oct 2019, 20:12 PMKatitof

Specifically because he is a sniper he gets 35 range.
Sections have 10 or less.

Afaik they have very similar flare throw range. Your data might be outdated.
20 Oct 2019, 21:17 PM
#50
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13476 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post20 Oct 2019, 20:12 PMKatitof

Specifically because he is a sniper he gets 35 range.
Sections have 10 or less.

That information is false, the range of flare for IS was 20 and was increased to 30 in 2016....

Sniper does had range 30 and was increase to 35 in the same patch.
20 Oct 2019, 21:42 PM
#51
avatar of distrofio

Posts: 2358

If pyro had a single, faster firing, HE howitzer shell with extra damage to garrisons, for half the munition cost, then will that count as anti-garrison tool? Or is it too far behind yet?
20 Oct 2019, 21:49 PM
#52
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13476 | Subs: 1

If pyro had a single, faster firing, HE howitzer shell with extra damage to garrisons, for half the munition cost, then will that count as anti-garrison tool? Or is it too far behind yet?

Actually UKF arty could include a number of different shell types like smoke, incendiary, WP, HE, Air-bust...Some could be doctrinal some stock.

Incendiary would be better vs garrison both giving time to react and denying garrison.
22 Oct 2019, 22:37 PM
#53
avatar of Garrett

Posts: 309 | Subs: 1


Literally has flames on their mainline infantry that unlock for free 3 minutes into the game but ok.


Flame nades =/= flame thrower
23 Oct 2019, 17:53 PM
#54
avatar of thedarkarmadillo

Posts: 5279

jump backJump back to quoted post22 Oct 2019, 22:37 PMGarrett


Flame nades =/= flame thrower

The bulk of your fighting force that you also use to snare enemy armour=/= squishy engineer unit you might have all of 2 of.

Being always able to clear garrisons and deny cover is vastly superior to needing a specialist to do it. It especially causes problems vs the brits who are supposed to rely on cover and just got their nuts cut off so they are quite literally without a viable infantry squad before getting 5 man squads.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Livestreams

unknown 2

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

285 users are online: 1 member and 284 guests
Crecer13
17 posts in the last 24h
45 posts in the last week
100 posts in the last month
Registered members: 44650
Welcome our newest member, Gacorslotonline
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM