Posts: 573
why are u ok with bazzoka blob ? aguably thy are better than sherck as they have acces t at nades or are very cheap same for piat blob (which unlike usf is both cheap and has at nade )
Posts: 1392
Whatabout-ism is not an argument. Besides Zooks and Piats are not even remotely as powerful as schrecks.
Posts: 17884 | Subs: 8
why are u ok with bazzoka blob ? aguably thy are better than sherck as they have acces t at nades or are very cheap same for piat blob (which unlike usf is both cheap and has at nade )
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 122
why are u ok with bazzoka blob ? aguably thy are better than sherck as they have acces t at nades or are very cheap same for piat blob (which unlike usf is both cheap and has at nade )
Posts: 1392
The fact that you need 50% less squads to alpha strike a med?
The fact that shrecks will never bounce of stock meds?
There is a reason why zook/piat blobs don't exist and shreck, whenever possible due to the balance at the time, do.
Posts: 4474
they have much faster reload nad are cheaper + u can put them on what u want, i said arguably more parwerfull blod cause they can have acces to either cheap squad (re or Re) to use them or at nades ( Re and rifle )
Bazookas deal less damage, 80 vs 120. 2 schrecks = 3 zooks, and because of how Allies vs Axis armor is balanced, zooks have worse penetration.
Piats are much worse attacking, mainly defensive.
Katitof-2018
Posts: 911
The fact that you need 50% less squads to alpha strike a med?
The fact that shrecks will never bounce of stock meds?
There is a reason why zook/piat blobs don't exist and shreck, whenever possible due to the balance at the time, do.
Posts: 783
Bazookas deal less damage, 80 vs 120. 2 schrecks = 3 zooks, and because of how Allies vs Axis armor is balanced, zooks have worse penetration.
Piats are much worse attacking, mainly defensive.
ukf
usf
okw
soviets
ostheer. Do not judge me, for my opinion is balanced. 
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
Posts: 573
Sturmpio AT upgrade limited to 1 Pzshrek only is rather limited. Has no snares which is what it should not have but they should get access instead to 2 Panzerbursche for the unjust price of 70 ammo.
60 ammo for Penals AT upgrade does 2-3 times better since it does 240 damage in 9 seconds while Sturmpio does half 120 damage. Penals have snares while Sturmpio does not. It is currently the worst and the underwhelming AT infantry focused unit in game! I am quite everyone cries when they have little alternative/options between either AT support weapon or AT infantry unit. Being forced is some way just to pick only one option which is currently Rak only. Sturmpio AT it currently places you in a terrible spot!
Devs and audience, check comment 7 & 9 here on this link. Check also other comments. https://community.companyofheroes.com/discussion/245957/sturmpio-2-pzshreks-and-revamp-raketenwerfer
I explain why it needs changes and how it is currently unsuitable or not proficient at all in AT the Sturmpio. Did include also Rak for certain reasons also!
USF and UKF although has less penetration and damage with zooks and piats, all in all has way better accessbility especially the addition of using snares. Makes them better than OKW overall has in utility wise, in terms of AT.
OKW is quite lackluster in AT accessibility. Fix Sturmpio AT Devs please. 70 ammo is unjustified and it is currently not potent enough to suit as AT role. For its current performance and price, it is simply underwhelming!!!
Posts: 1392
Posts: 1392
Go head and create topic about OP PTRS and underpowered Sturmpios, this one is about feedback to recent changes
Posts: 783
Go head and create topic about OP PTRS and underpowered Sturmpios, this one is about feedback to recent changes
ukfusfokwsovietsostheer. Do not judge me, for my opinion is balanced. Posts: 4474
still works pretty well if they don't prepare before hand, especially now that it's bugged and the commander mode makes u invisible but immobile ignoring damage
For me it seems you don't like the fact, that steam-rolling with early T70 etc. doesn't work that easy anymore. Same for Ostwind, because it can now counter infantry, or PnzGrens arrive at same times as Shocks or Thomons-troups.
Katitof-2018
Posts: 379 | Subs: 1
Posts: 959
Posts: 13476 | Subs: 1
Posts: 5279
There's good feedback and there's bad feedback. Guess which one this is.
Posts: 2
Posts: 155
Could someone tell me why they didn't fix the bofors AA? Is it an oversight? They had fixed it in the final iteration of the mod by increasing chance of shooting down the plane from 0%(!)to 10%.Its probably a bug like all the others which are being found in the current live game lol. They will fix all of them soon hopefully. Lets just be patient.
 |
|
|
80 | ||
 |
|
|
57 | ||
|
|
|
|
49 | ||
|
|
|
|
14 | ||
 |
|
|
10 | ||
|
|
|
|
10 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
53 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
