Profile of Kirrik

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 571

General Information


Thread: Remove counter-barrage.16 Jan 2021, 19:02 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Jan 2021, 18:20 PMThamor lol whine about LefH, where B4 is much more worse to play against with it's one shot wiping ability. If only half of axis commanders didnt have some combinations of recon and offmaps, especially meta ones... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback9 Dec 2020, 02:37 AM Everything Miragefla said about about ISU behind ZiS wall could be also said about Elefant/JT sitting behind Atlantic wall denying enemy tanks and even TD chance to push enemy away. Somehow ISU countering infantry is bad, but Elefant/JT doing the exact same to vehicles is perfectly okay. The fact that JT also has a barrage and it's not touched in same patch ISU AI and ZiS barrage were nerfed is funny In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback30 Nov 2020, 01:20 AM Didnt you guys nerf PTRS deflection damage long time ago (because it was too OP lul)? Now you're wondering why PTRS squads are so useless in late game against actual tanks? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback27 Nov 2020, 19:57 PM What was purpose of SU-85 vet nerf? Only vehicles that benefit from that change are ones SU-85 was supposed to hardcounter (Kingtiger) or ones it already struggles with (Elefant/JT). Balance team really thinks Ele/JT underpowered vs SU-85 and need moar buffs? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback27 Nov 2020, 16:15 PM Why does 85 even have ram at this point? Give this thing smoke shells or some other utility, capture territory and ram on tank costing 130 fuel and requiring doctrine is not okay In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Conscript PPSH assault package8 Nov 2020, 10:28 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Nov 2020, 09:48 AMflyingpancake I see a lot of people saying that sprint might be a problem. Why not just disable sprint like with the fusiliers or replace it with a smoke grenade so they become more similar to mp40 volks? After the PPSH upgrade ofcourse. Is sprinting a problem on conscripts with 3 smgs but not on assgrens who have 50% more dps on top of grenades when upgraded? Also Volks upgrade gives them utility instead of removing it. Quite an interesting logic of buffing something by nerfing it In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Conscript PPSH assault package7 Nov 2020, 19:56 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Nov 2020, 19:55 PMVipper And you fail to understand the benefits of having 3 transferable SMGs. Having 3 SMG means that conscripts lose less close DPS one the lose entities. That is why ST are not a very successful squad because when they lose a model they lose 25% of their DPS. If three smgs are such an advantage why nobody seen PPSh for last couple of years? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Conscript PPSH assault package7 Nov 2020, 19:52 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Nov 2020, 19:51 PMVipper Nice theory but wrong since the majority of units using SMG have only SMGs and thus little mid/far DPS. Conscripts on the other hand use bolt action/smgs and thus already have DPS beyond 10 meters. Yea majority of units dont have only three smgs either. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Conscript PPSH assault package7 Nov 2020, 19:46 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Nov 2020, 16:59 PMgbem uhh conscript PPSHs drop in DPS sharply beyond range 10... far more than volk mp40 do... at range 20 volk mp40s have the more DPS as the mosin nagant at 2.7 vs 1.9 while cons ppsh have 0.691 Just checked. Conscript PPSh's were the only combat unit SMG that didnt get buff. There you go. that explains why they suck balls To add insult to injury cons also get 3 smg's compared to 5/6 of volks and assgrens, I guess 3 PPSh' were "too strong" to do anything beyond point blank In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Conscript PPSH assault package6 Nov 2020, 10:19 AM Do Con PPSh's still have old SMG DPS curve where they deal no damage beyond 10m range? Changing that and maybe reducing upgrade cost would be enough In: COH2 Balance