Profile of Kirrik

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 456

General Information


Thread: Ostwind's penetrations23 Jun 2019, 15:40 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Jun 2019, 14:45 PMmiragefla So you mean a more defined role at killing infantry, the Ostwind’s primary role in the tier? More defined role of killing intarty = AA vehicle usurping role of dedicated AI vehicles such as Brummbar or Hetzer and doing it better cheaper and faster? Using same logic I'd expect you to double T-34 ROF considering it's all around piece of crap? Also I'm not seeing M5 AA recieving buff of similar caliber, nothing even remotely as powerful as giving it drastically reduced cooldown or huge increase in burst duration yet it's also dedicated AI vehicle that most certanly saw less use than Ostwind? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostwind's penetrations23 Jun 2019, 00:11 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Jun 2019, 23:26 PMthedarkarmadillo If the TD stops the Ostwind from maurading it isn't dead weight.... What's more is it will still damage mediums and still has a barrage. The su76 is likley the LEAST dead weight TD in the game due to that barrage... It's useless on half of the maps due to mere fact it's turretless. Try winning a direct engagement with 400hp/70 armor In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostwind's penetrations22 Jun 2019, 23:02 PM Yeah it arives usually after T4 goes up but you dont have enough time/fuel for SU-85 so you're forced into deadweight medium - T-34 which has no scaling in team games OR you have to stay on T3 and get SU-76 which has no scaling in large teamgames either and does not even work on city maps as it's turretless compared to puma which can easily zone Centaur Trying to fight it off with PTRS is pure memery - you either lose squads on retreat or get bled to death You're basically forced into picking bad vehicles with no scaling as SU just to stop Ostwind. Thats not the same as getting P4 or Puma to stop Centaur, those vehicles are not a deadweight In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostwind's penetrations22 Jun 2019, 22:31 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Jun 2019, 22:18 PMinsaneHoshi Is it anti heavy tank? Then it isnt anti-everything. Are you saying that its anti medium tank? How does the ost's performance against the weakest and cheapest medium in the game, means it beats every other medium too? And arnt they the same price? Why shouldnt they be about equivalent? Because all (allied) mediums have pretty much same armor (150-160) and same amount of HP, it could've been cromwell or sherman And again my point is - Ostwind performance is outlandish for it's cost and timing, especially against Soviets that do no have zooks or piats to try and ambush it, what happened to T-34 is just side effect JLI style overbuff to Ostwinds ROF. What was the point of nerfing Brummbar only to introduce current Ostwind later on? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 15 minute Tiger/Tiger Ace in 4v422 Jun 2019, 18:04 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Jun 2019, 18:00 PMLago The reason I was given was they didn't want to bind all heavies to tech blind. They didn't have the resources to rebalance every heavy tank, so they only bound the ones they were working on in the commander patch. I wanted them all bound in the patch we just had, but I was told binding the Command Panther without other adjustments would eliminate OKW's only competitive high level team game strategy. The intent in the next patch is to bind them all to tech. And next patch is coming when? Late Summer? Fall? This stuff should've been postoned untill then. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostwind's penetrations22 Jun 2019, 17:45 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Jun 2019, 17:40 PMLago The singular Ostwind gets beaten into the dirt by a T-34/76. Double Ostwind vs stationary T-34/76 is a fair fight with pretty high variance. Single Brummbar wins against a stationary T-34/76 pretty reliably. Man you're so focused at T-34 duels even though my entire point here was Ostwind being overbuffed to the point of threatening mediums, not that it's effective AT vehicle. Brummbar was nerfed because it was too good at everything including fighting mediums thankts to retarded armor values. Ostwind is in same state as pre-nerf Brummbar now its too cost effective at what it does for it's cost. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostwind's penetrations22 Jun 2019, 17:38 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Jun 2019, 17:36 PMdistrofio Didnt you complain before using unrealistic stats and less than ideal void universe combats and even when proved wrong in such scenario now you bring a realistic one that will disfavour your non consequent argument even more? sander just made a closer to real situation and it went all against your point. But to you, an even more reaslistic scenario is worth to bring up because you think its going to be in your favour? Dont you get that AFK players combat or very dumb ones are simply out of context now? Really, are you some kind of troll of another galaxy? "Real situation" proved my point entirely - despite RNG being completely in T-34 favor and hitting every single shot on the move it still lost even under best circumstances. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostwind's penetrations22 Jun 2019, 17:34 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Jun 2019, 17:31 PMKiwiBirb 180 fuel of units wins against 90 fuel of units! WOW! I was talking about singular unit there but 180 fuel worth of anti-infantry/anti-aircraft vehicles threatening medium while wiping infantry? I dont see Brummbar pulling that off anymore and cost of T4 and Brumm combined is higher than two Ostwinds. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostwind's penetrations22 Jun 2019, 17:31 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Jun 2019, 17:23 PMStug life ur are just biased as always, it comes at the same time as centaur ur argument was that brits rushing centaur was weaker than ost rush cause u are so ignorant an biased u didn't even count tier 1 and 2 for the cost and was saying that ost RUSHING and SKIPPING tier 1 and 2 leaving them only with mgs pioneer and Pgren was stronger than brits rushing even tho they get x 2 the units if u lost to ostwind and came here crying go play ost and show us how op they are did u even play ost once in ur life to not know tier 1 and 2 cost fuel ? Grenadiers dont need any fuel costing upgrades to work as mainline. Pgrens with schrek could easily cover lack of AT gun before you get to T3, you're not leaving yourself vulnerable to LV rushes while going to Ostwind. You absolutely do if you try to do this as brit. Very kind of you miss my point entirely and let me repeat again - I never suggested skipping T1 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostwind's penetrations22 Jun 2019, 17:16 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Jun 2019, 17:10 PMStug life no u can get rack, why is bolster obligatory now ? btw it's u who said rush ostwind I'm not the one who suggested you should skip T1 while doing so In any case It's quite clear people are defending it same way JLI and Overwatch were being defended even though it's obviously overbuffed. I made my case here - it's too easy to rush and it's wayyyy too powerful for it's cost and timing In: COH2 Balance