Profile of Katitof

Maybe you can play games like them, or me. But the vast majority can not and simply be deleted.

And a general message for that majority is to "git gud".
If something is not a problem at high level play, then it literally screams "you're just bad" and its hardly a balance case.

Eee, nope?

The reason that top teams are winning against such strats and cheese plays it's becouse they find out the solution to beat it. It doesn't justify that those units/builds/tactics are too cost efficient to their counterplays which make them unbalance in a longer term.

So you're basically telling us here that if we actually have a clue on how to play our faction, then that faction suddenly does not look weak? That if opponent does Rock, you should do Paper to counter it and not use your Scissors every singular time because you THINK it should work good, complaining how hard you have it on forums?

All of the perceived OP allied units were used during these games and team playing axis at the moment always managed to overcome them.

Its almost as if the issue is with knowing what your shit does, how to use it and when to use different shit instead of trying to use magical, unflexible same BO on all maps, against all team comps, at all skill levels, regardless of what opponent do and now with the long term balance.

You rarely see top players complain all the time about something(except Hans and his bad RNG when parking on own mines), because these players are not mentally stuck 5 patches ago, they read changes and adapt themselves to new balance, which I can not say about a singular person who creates a thread like this one.

Bottom line is, balance section is overcrowded with people who should be spamming threads in strategy desk.

having weapons superior to builder units are hardy something to brag about.

and all those ability were a result of fails attempt to make them a proper unit.

Yeah, that "superior 0.02 DPS" at close range is going to make a WORLD of difference.

Partisan have available to them camo,

With no ability to move across the cover and no first strike bonus.

mines,

So do CEs, how's that going to help?

molotovs,

Requires upgrade and unless behind weapon crew, they'll be murdered before they can throw it.

elite grenades (similar to Guards)

Which is on cooldown during the most important moment when you want partisans in.

and their weapon are superior to pioneers.

By a staggering 0.02 DPS.

They can be used to jump on support weapon and even steal them,

You'd have to be completely blind or use half dead weapon crew to lose it to single partisan squad without nade and since nade starts off on cooldown...

can be used to mine, to wire, ambush with grenades and scout whiled cloaked. I am not sure what else one would expect from 210 cost unit.

To be good at the singular job they have perhaps.
Its the only squad which is pointless to keep alife, because you are not going to get return on that investment, unless you managed to get it on initial call-in.

If one to redesign them one should also change their cost.

Nothing against it.
210 is expensive enough to not spam them anyway and they already come with plethora of disadvantages, being 4 man squad with no RA bonuses, fighting against weapons designed to mow down 6 man squads being the most prominent of them all.

Literally the only reason to ever get partisans is to use soviet infiltration squad and only because this is the only one. There is a reason why no one ever uses them and only worst of players are losing to them after the "buffs".

Good, provide us links of this claimed abundance of Panther play in 1v1.

Read more then one post back and you'll see we were talking tiger.

Which does more damage USF mortar or the stupid ost one

Ost one, USF one got worse aoe dmg profile.