Profile of Katitof

but panther already has high pop cap ?

If that one more pop cap point helps with churchill, it'll also help with panthers, which are equal problem, especially in team games now that ost T4 is easily affordable.

And allies heavy tanks have much stronger armor now than axis rear...oh kat...

You've said that already, but didn't managed to produce any argument still. You have any point to that or just want to post random facts?

I find the dynamics wrong, to be concerned and label churchhill as a lousy gun with its pen and 160 damage to 640-960 units.

A generalist tank got its gun performance consistent with any other generalist tank OH IMBALANCE!

Yet we gloss over its counter pen that have does 160 damage to its 240/180/1400 survivability and strong vet bonus..

What strong vet bonus?
Its vet is comparable to any other vehicle, it got nice gimmick at vet3, in fact, its combat vet related to tank fighting is LOWER then any other generalist tank with churchill lowest turret rotation and least reload bonuses.

why ? did u do some actual test ?

The tests were made last patch, when ostwind was being buffed.
You can dig feedback threads up and check them yourself.

kv1 and churchills should be comparable but in the game one is crap and the other works great, don't make straw men.

And yet, KV-1 survivability is being buffed over and over, not the gun.
KV-1 at the moment isn't far behind churchill, especially since last vet change.

I destroy tiger with churchills *.

Imagine when I take more than one, or even if I carry a firefly behind.

And how is that any special?
A pair of T34/76 WILL destroy Tiger as well.
Is it so much of a surprise for you that 300+ fuel investment beats 230 fuel? You might have just as well said that sun is hot or water is wet and used it as an argument.

To say that carrying a firefly behind a churchill demonstrates how bad a cannon is like saying that the tiger is bad because it needs infantry with faust because otherwise any light AT vehicle could destroy it, again do not make straw men.

Being inadequate =! being bad.
Your analogy doesn't make any sense so I'm not even going to address it.

again obvious that that chromwell cannon is in a very resistant chassis that is capable of destroying heavy tanks with many shots, will not penetrate many shots? Yes, will you deflect many shots? Yes, can you take the tiger 1 vs 1 to the limit? quite provable.

2 Cromwells can destroy a tiger.
2 Churchills most certainly will.
2 KV-1 will destroy it.
So will 2 T34/76.
All of them will lose 1v1 fights.
Not a single of them has overperforming gun in any way shape or form.
Your argument doesn't really have anything to stand on.

I reiterate what makes the churchill great is the capacity of very high armor and health with a medium cannon that can have the trouble of taking time and penetrating and destroying tanks, with a very good price of fuel and the ability to take more than one.

Yes, that's what makes is great. No, its armor isn't anything special, especially compared to axis armor, OKW P4 got only 6 armor less then churchill.
No, it doesn't make it too strong post recent changes.
Stop acting like its not slow, easily kite-able tank.
Ability to make more then 1 got severely reduced with latest preview update, so you don't have that argument anymore.

no more straw men pls

Oh the irony....
I'm glad you've learned new phrase, but perhaps you should also learn the meaning behind it, so you can apply it correctly. I highly advise you to do so, because some forum goers struggle extremely with context of some words.