Profile of Crecer13

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2

General Information


Thread: WW2 Daily Pic7 Sep 2019, 10:29 AM https://csdfmuseum.ru/projects/partizanskoe-dvizhenie-v-krymu-v-1943-1944-godakh# Site about partisans in Crimea. In: The Library
Thread: What faction and modus get played most / less!5 Sep 2019, 20:39 PM Speaking about the topic, I prefer the Soviets for several reasons: - I like them - I'm tired of constantly copying a fraction: 4 Germans, 2 USA, 2 Britain in two parts of the game. That’s why I don’t really like playing for the Axis - 4 German factions. If СoH2 had Italy or Japan as a third fraction, I would spend significantly more time on the Axis. And If the Third Part will really be Italy / Africa - new Italy alone will not motivate the purchase of the Third Part. In: Lobby
Thread: What faction and modus get played most / less!5 Sep 2019, 13:48 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2019, 13:41 PMSturmTigerVorgo Let's take a simple example to show to you that you really don't know what you are asking: Lets assume grens and cons are perfectly balanced in 1v1. What change do they need to make to balance them in 2v2? My point is if the factions are perfectly balanced in 1v1 why they need to be balanced in 2v2? How are they umbalanced? The fact that in 1vs1 you are obliged to build 4 or more Conscripts and Grenadier squad at the start to control the map. In 2vs2 and above no one builds 4 units of the Conscripts and the Grenadier, a maximum of two units. The game's timings are changing. In 1vs1 light tanks are required, in team games light tanks are simply skipped and the best tanks are expected. In: Lobby
Thread: What faction and modus get played most / less!5 Sep 2019, 13:38 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2019, 13:34 PMSturmTigerVorgo They couldn't figure out yet how to balance 1v1 properly, how do you expect to balance team games? Firstly, I don’t believe in balance at all. This is subjective, there will always be problems, there will always be discontent. I believe in new content, it is material and provides an incentive to continue an already long game. Secondly, it was possible to divide the balance for 1 versus 1 and for team games, their gameplay is different and they must be balanced in different ways. In: Lobby
Thread: What faction and modus get played most / less!5 Sep 2019, 13:21 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2019, 13:15 PMaerafield The main reason why brits are the least played is because they are the newest faction (and locked behind a DLC). Wehr is pretty popular because it's part of the base CoH2 package and I guess more people think it's more interesting to play as the axis as they probably are more "WW2 iconic" than the allies factions. I see a lot players in automatch who use the names of Wehrmacht Generals or important Wehr divisions as their steam nickname.... and most of the times they mainly play axis only. But I barely ever see people doing that with Generals or armies of the allies. And most players who use generals or SS Division names play horribly. It's like a Nazi lamp for silly motels. In: Lobby
Thread: What faction and modus get played most / less!5 Sep 2019, 13:14 PM What amuses me the most about these statistics is that team games are more popular. But they balance only around 1vs1. In: Lobby
Thread: Soviet September patch discussion4 Sep 2019, 15:09 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Sep 2019, 14:58 PMStug life they should come in doc tho My main concept: - Conscripts are renamed to "strelki (rifleman)" or "rifle squad" get the opportunity to purchase SVT-40 after the construction of T1 / T2, maybe get a fragmentation grenade instead of Molotov garbage. Merge deleted - Penalties are renamed to "Conscripts " and placed in the ability "rapid conscript" get Molotov and merge. - Guard always synergize with T1. It was always you build T1 and build the Guard, after PTRS Penalties it was gone. If 2CP is late for early light cars. Guard can be built in T1. - The Shock Troops are getting Explosion package. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet September patch discussion4 Sep 2019, 14:57 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Sep 2019, 14:49 PMStug life g43 come at tier 1 tho In any case, what would the Penals with the purchase of SVT-40 be at least somehow comparable with the Fusiliers, they should be T0. Conscripts in T0. No one will move Penals. Penals - either remain the same or must be removed and SVT-40 are given to Conscripts. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet September patch discussion4 Sep 2019, 14:36 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Sep 2019, 14:27 PMJulianSnow Plus that war isn't balanced.. What they really should remove is that retreat option on Penals, because if they did retreat in 1943 the commissar would shoot them due to order 227. The commissars were abolished in 1942. And more: in the game commissar is in the NKVD commander. but the commissar is the representative of the party in the army; he has nothing to do with the NKVD and in fact has no power over the soldiers. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet September patch discussion4 Sep 2019, 14:32 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Sep 2019, 14:14 PMStark Same as panzerfuzzilier without G43 upgrade No, not the same. For Penals, you spend resources for T1 (160mp + 10 fuel) and do not get support. Panzerfuzzilier in T0 and you can go to any tier and in any case you will get MG-34. So the fines with the purchase of SVT-40 - the death of T1. In: COH2 Balance