Let's talk about it. In this topic, you can see that Challenges are added to the game as an element of the game. And it's a very, very bad move. Stop turning the game into a Live Service, in most games I've seen Challenges it all comes down to a dull routine, the game turns into a work to complete tasks and will directly negatively affect gameplay when the player is directly focused on completing the Challenges than on the current situation in the game and when you pay attention to this, the answer is: - I don't care, I do Challenges. |
|
Well, I see the problem of hit registration or damage model is still here, Pz4 fired directly at the front of the M4 and "side hit", Tiger shoots at the front M18 - "rear hit". |
|
Free? Are you out of your mind? No, we will do better - live service, so pay for the seasons.
Look at the last interview there is a conversation about what they want to make the game a service game. |
I look at this photo and think what's the problem? The Wehrmacht soldiers had a similar camouflage, until not all soldiers were equipped with them. But this is quite authentic, unlike the Soviets, in which only conscription and shock troops are close to authentic. |
|
To be honest, I wasn't impressed at all. As the developers themselves emphasize, this is the same USA for the third time, which, moreover, is almost an exact copy from CoH1, it's just not interesting. With the same success, it was possible to simply make a CoH1 remake on a new engine, at least there were interesting maps and not these deserted, empty maps that cause desolation. |
|
Oh boy, I don't like what I heard: live service. This sounds very bad. We have already seen perfectly how nothing is worth the promises of support for many many years of the game, and we see clearly that only a few super successful games can boast of a "live service". The concept of "live service" is vicious and bad, but developers keep trying to use it in the hope of making big money. But as soon as they see that they are not coming the game quickly dies. Remind everyone about BF5 and BF2042 which were supposed to be a super live service, but in the end turned out to be a dummy that they were not going to support. |
Isn't it considerably worsened by the fact that hardly anyone plays big team modes like 3v3 though?
On the contrary, there were some statistics here. And the more players in the mode, the more people play it. So there are more people playing 3v3 and 4v4 than 1v1 and 2v2, but the whole game is balanced around 1v1 and not the much more popular 4v4. |
|
CD Projekt Red also shot itself in the foot, they took away the project of next gen porting the Witcher from the Russian studio Saber Interactive Russia, because it is Russian, although it is part of the international Embracer Group. Years of work are simply thrown away. Saber Interactive Russia was fully engaged in this project without the participation of CD Projekt. Saber Interactive Russia had a lot of work with the Red Engine, at the same time, CD Project has few people who can work with the Red Engine and the studio moves to Unreal Engine, this greatly affected the quality of Cyberpunk. |
"angling" your tank does nothing
always keep your front part of the tank facing the enemy guns, if the sides are exposed, they can hit the rear armor and damage you easier
In the German Alpha mission, this didn't matter either, there were constant "flank" and "rear" hits even if the tank was strictly frontal to the gun, it would be unpleasant to see this on the release. |
|
It was the right move to give the M-42 a buckshot shot, and an absolutely stupid decision to nerf the firing range to fist impact range. It was much wiser to leave the distance, but to make a buckshot shot would have been limited in time.
But speaking in general, the M-42 is the same vestige of the initially bad design of the USSR from Relic. Penals, M-42 is the fifth paw of the dog, unnecessary units that remained after this redesign and which do not make sense. |
Relic Entertainment
shadics ARG. 
The101stAirBorne 
