Profile of Brick Top

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1168

General Information


Thread: Relic: Ask Duffy29 Apr 2015, 14:40 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Apr 2015, 14:04 PMKatitof They have increased CPs for them. They won't do anything with the cost, because they don't overperform for the cost, if they increased the costs, they would have to buff them as well. Increasing cost isnt the only way, theres loads. Tie it to building requirement (like Kappa patch), while you can still choose to stall for heavies, it is an indirect price increase if you do so (having to tech), and the simple fact its a requirement would mean you may as well get a medium or two anyway. It would shake things up a bit. In: Lobby
Thread: British Faction, what do you want to see?29 Apr 2015, 14:09 PM Well.. UKF is kinda weird... but then again so are most of the COH faction names, so whats new? The only name which is pretty spot on is probably Soviets. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Relic: Ask Duffy29 Apr 2015, 14:00 PM Cant believe im the 1st person to ask about call in meta and if mediums can be made more attractive over heavy spam. They adjusted tier 3/4 cost to promote light vehicles, but didnt change call in costs. In: Lobby
Thread: British Faction, what do you want to see?29 Apr 2015, 13:00 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Apr 2015, 11:22 AMKobunite Ah, the Paras are a bunch of scrubs compared to the Green Berets of the Royal Marines. :-P Paras would probably make a better commander though...unless they add a swimming mechanic for RMs. Please. There is a reason 75% of the S.A.S. are drawn from the Paras. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: I wish there was a 'vaulting move' option for squads.28 Apr 2015, 13:07 PM I think the idea is to reward better micro and map knowlege etc etc. In: Lobby
Thread: How does this strategy seem to work?28 Apr 2015, 12:57 PM I can understand the attraction to going panthers. They are just far easier to use well, given their speed and manouverability. However, its true that Tigers are so much easier to reach and are better vs infantry, paks offer all the additional AT you need to supplement Tigers. In: Ostheer Strategies
Thread: Early game for Ost26 Apr 2015, 10:46 AM Ive been playing exclusive Ost 1s and 2s recently and having tried so many strats. The only one that consistently has any weight is heavy t 1+2 into Stug E. Its the manpower saving of Stug E that makes them so good. So you can back them with plenty of squads and paks. They are cheap so vet up quick and have target weak point, which combined with paks is lethal against counter mediums. Theres no other way to command most of the map and be able to punish inf and vehicles early as Werh. Id say Stug E pen could go down slightly. But Ost needs some other buff, like cheaper MP tecking. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: m36-Jackson is over performing25 Apr 2015, 04:31 AM Just use true sight to protect your tanks while bringing paks forward, covering the paks with the tanks. Its more of a problem in open maps (for Ost with no JP4). If you dont go elifant you'l just have to use forward paks again and try to defend them Vs inf. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: British Faction, what do you want to see?24 Apr 2015, 04:48 AM Units that make sense. Coh1 commandos wore Paras maroon beret.. NOT commandos green beret. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Vet 3 Kubel Bug23 Apr 2015, 13:37 PM Vet 1000 kubel In: COH2 Bugs