Profile of elchino7

If I’m not wrong pupchen has a hole in the middle of the gun and the shield does not protect the user

Visuals doesn't matter. Read the linked post. I can't test the interaction between a shell impacting the hitbox of the AT gun and how much dmg it transmit when the tank shells are specially doing over 160 with splash.

The difference with the pupchen is that it is more likely to hit in the middle of the squad pass the weapon cause is less likely or at all to hit the gun itself.

If you were to try to implement a cover on the pupchen, it wouldn't work cause the weapon itself is really small. Unless you want invisible walls.

Moderator hat on: you guys get a room for yourselves (PM). There's gonna be a lot of activity in this threads so please, try to up your game a bit and don't comment like you would in any other day in the balance section. What you guys are doing is just polluting the thread and making reading feedback harder.



Ontopic:

Just in case people don't understand the maxim change. Suppression against single squads is unchanged. What they are trying to accomplish is that a blob charging shoulder to shoulder should be easier to suppress.
Single squad or slightly spread blob won't care at all.

The main issue with the deathloop is when the model pushing the maxim is continually getting sniped most often due to small arms. When you say you can trigger the deathloop intentionally i assumed you meant you could somehow force your squads to target the correct model every time through some micro trick.
Any fool can throw a huge blob at an mg and wipe it before it can get out of range.

I do not think the 6 man weapon team is there to compensate for the deathloop otherwise why do soviet at guns and mortars also have 6 men? This is more of a Soviet themed thing.


My suggestion would be something along the lines of giving the maxim gunner a universal cover on retreat sort of like how at guns provide directional green cover to the crew.

Attack move and long range DPS. While i thikn the operator model tends to have a lower priority, an attack move makes the squad engage the first model they see, which in most of the cases is gonna be the guys behind the weapon. The rest is history.

Cover for support weapons don't help and neither they work. See the other thread.

If they are going to lock the JPIV as well behind the other tanks i think they could take a little more risk in making Obers arrive way faster, specially without the LMG.

Quite a lot of changes to grasp but i do indeed like that there are plenty of QOL + things which were long overdue been touched.

I do not play custom games. No one really does since online is what most people play.

1v1 or online matches, there are no blizzards.

There is more reason as to why it should be removed since mulitplayer is more popular and it should be adjusted accordingly in that manner.

It be adjusted according to its current rules and gameplays.

Blizzard no longer plays a role, therefore it should be removed for something else or just remove for a price decrease.

I want to use it willingly, with some purpose and viability which it currently has none, in multiplayer.

The cold immunity is not hindering the chance of the upgrade receiving a change at all nor it has any weight on the the unit balance.
There's no point in removing it.

People often mistakenly assume that because a similar unit or weapon has a certain cost attached to it, they should be mirrored in another completely different faction.
To top it off, people think that double upgrades are just 2x the cost of a single upgrade. It has always been that cost/opportunity of a more expensive upgrades tends to have a discount on them.
Finally, there's the unit which is intended to receive the upgrade and what they gain or lose by having them.

Ex: compare PG upgrade. It originally was 120 x 2 when probably the cost intended for a single one was much higher. Look at Storm/Volks originally PS cost. You can see how been a much expensive squad can affect the value of it.

I believe what should be tested is making the upgrade not exclusive with minesweeper. That change alone would make the upgrade see way more use. You never want to be without a sweeper at all and for most strats been at 2xSP is less viable than just buying the mechanized repair upgrade which cost no pop.

I'm not opposed to see further changes on Sturms, but i really think that a change that small will have bigger repercussions. Been able to have an easier time vetting allowing the unit to get access to stun nades as an example, will push the units further than just reducing the cost of the upgrade.

All I'm saying is that if I take both of these things to be true, the implication here is fascinating.

Nippy. Kind. Langur.