Profile of Hannibal

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 3119 | Subs: 2

General Information


Thread: Sturmpioneer schreck still costs 70 muni28 Feb 2020, 16:45 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Feb 2020, 16:36 PMUnit G17 The teller mine solution would turn the schreck Sturmpios into a dedicated AT squad without buffing their direct AT capabilities (I mean without buffing the schreck or giving them an another one). Getting an another pio squad to access teller mines, especially with plenty of munitions floating, is an option I'm sure even top players would consider. I think the idea is interesting, but I think giving a faction access tobith normal and heavy mines on the stock units is bad. However the issues it could cause could be quite little since it's usually not a good idea to go double pio. It could just lead to a lot of 'cheese' in the mid to lower ranks where you're not required to play super meta In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sturmpioneer schreck still costs 70 muni28 Feb 2020, 15:48 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Feb 2020, 09:29 AMblancat It would be better to allow an additional Panzershrek to be purchased when OKW built a T3 building rather than giving the STP an elite Panzershrek Panzershrek with mine sweeper? No Make STP get additional panzershrek to 50muni Well that's surely an option. I'd prefer one of zhe other solutions though due to the fact that they should be easier to implement and the fact that Sturmpioniere would thereby become better Schreck PGrens (slightly lower AI, but building and repair capabilities plus other utility) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sturmpioneer schreck still costs 70 muni28 Feb 2020, 09:22 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Feb 2020, 01:18 AMblancat STP is elite infantry? Ut's for balance reasons. Call it however you want In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Terrible new form if trolling/griefing 25 Feb 2020, 21:49 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Feb 2020, 20:48 PMVipper No I am not anything but sure. I guess you can give it a try with SWS truck and infatry fire Aaaaaaalright. I did a highly scientific test and blew up 100 SwS half trucks with a shit ton of Commandos. No abandon whatsoever. Chance of that happening naturally: 0,6%, assuming that the game does not glitch out because I used a LOT of commandos. However I saw that the ATGs sometimes destroy the SwS to a optically "functional" (read: not completely burned out) wreck, while Commandos only make the burned out version. I don't think that the SwS can be abandoned though apart from a super rare bug. Therefore, Superhansfan: Replay or it did not happen. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Terrible new form if trolling/griefing 25 Feb 2020, 19:59 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Feb 2020, 19:49 PMVipper If you want to cause critical to vehicles use weapon that do little damage and not Packs since the more hit the more chance and some criticals (abandon also if I remember correctly) need a specific HP threshold. That is an added bonus of PTRS/Boys... I thought the abandon was a mechanic that is applied after death and is a 5% roll, independent of the damage source? For gun damage etc I agree, but are you absolutely sure that abandon follows the same logic? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Terrible new form if trolling/griefing 25 Feb 2020, 19:31 PM Alright, I'm not sure if the SwS can be abandoned. I sacrificed 59 trucks into PaKs now, all were completely destroyed. Chance for not seeing an abandon naturally ~5%. Even if we deduct some trucks due to overkills (I drove them into groups of 2 ATGs each, so in some instances a truck that would abandon might have gotten the destruction shot in quick succession) and calculate with 50 trucks, the chance goes up to about 8%. So yes, there is a chance this was all normal. But based on this I really doubt it is the case. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Sturmpioneer schreck still costs 70 muni25 Feb 2020, 18:52 PM Either Elite Schreck as I suggested a couple of days ago or make it non-exclusive with the sweeper. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Terrible new form if trolling/griefing 25 Feb 2020, 17:20 PM This one really straddles the line between glitch and feature extremely hard. My rationale says it should be patched out. But my heart wants to keep it just for the lulz In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Raketens are too good25 Feb 2020, 17:17 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Feb 2020, 10:16 AMVipper The extra issue is that it "remembers" the move order so if for any reason it gets detected it starts moving... Oh wow. That's really special. However I think the current 'don't move while in camo' comes from the idea that the Rak should be able to rotate while in Camo. If a playrr had to click it there would also be small kateral movements which would break it. That was afaik the reasoning behind this, not sure what costs less micro and provides more overall benefits though. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why maxim is trash23 Feb 2020, 20:02 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Feb 2020, 19:33 PMelchino7 Small correction. The model at which the Maxim aims at, is not receiving any cover. The cover icon appears when half or more of the squad is receiving any kind of cover. You can deduce at which model it is aiming by how it died a second later. It must have gotten light cover I think. The whole squad got the cover icon, which happens as you said if half of the models are in the respective cover type. I assumed that the two models in light cover were the guy to the bottom and the front model that was targeted. I don't think the two guys in the top left got any cover at all, they're too far out. The bottom and the front one are closer to the slope. In: Lobby