The only problem with Scott - you need 3 shots to kill it, realistically you aren't suppose to use them aggressively to begin with, so imo there is no reason for them to have 3 shot hp tool.
Speaking of, why are we even discussing Scott when it's more or less fine without airborne but broken with it? I mean in 3v3/4v4 both pathfinders are OP af right now and all good USF players abuse the hell out of it. Not only with a bit of micro they shit on everything early game but also instantly locking areas with mg/at drops and self spot as weapon crews.
How the F are pathfinders OP??? They havent been touched in ages
Especially ones on airborne, recon support Paths are better... Paths only do well if they shooting with other units, on their own they are useless (which they should be) |
Than I guess that you take back what you have posted:
because you do not seem to agree with most things in his post.
Ill try one more time bro. U said it scouts just fine. I said it doesnt becuz it needs to vet up first
Nobody cares as much about tht part as u do. He thinks it needs a buff, I agree with that...
In your opinion is this an accurate description of the state of Stuart?
Now I can not answer your question unless you specify how you suggest it is buffed.
Imo Stuart seem to be doing fine in 1vs1 and maybe not that good in large modes (which is common for many unit) so how can someone buff it for larger mods without making OP is smaller modes?
If its only used in 1/4 gamemode thats not good. Give it upgrade to help scale up late game, makes gun bettr against tanks or that gives more HP |
|
Poll seems slightly biased. All the change options in last 2 quesitons are nerfs?
I think scotty is fine, but if the unit is getting ANY change it should be buff. No chance in hell it should get nerfed again |
Please learn the various differences between infantry and team weapon vs vehicles. Things like mobility for example. You can test this yourself at home! Open up a custom game and give orders to any vehicle and any infantry to go to a point. See which one gets there faster! It's a test so simple even you might be able to pull it off after a few tries.
LMAO dont count on it. Based on his ideas this seems above his capacity |
Kurobane clearly did compare Stuart with "light vehicles" and kubel in particular.
So seem you agree that these vehicles should not be compared.
I dont care about this point its semantical nonsense (ironic)
So you do agree my original post.
That u got the vet bonuses correct? Sure dude, i never said othewise. Like i said, i think you are over-emphasizing the value... Especially vet 3 which almost never happens
My original post said nothing about buffing or not buffing the Stuart.
It a simple question... Do you think it shuld be buffed? If no, then we disagree about the only thing that matters here.... ffs lol |
Do you agree that Stuart is not a scouting unit and thus it not be directly compared with unit like kubel?
Do you agree that at vet 1 Stuart with 45 sight can be used for vision?
Do you agree that at vet 3 Stuart with 56 sight can be used for Scouting?
Who the F directly compared them? HEs just talking about vision in general
Ofc it can be used for vision after you vet it up. Already said it, u never see a vet 3 stuart
Do u agree stuart needs a buff? No? Then we do not agree... |
That does not really make much sense.
In addition Stuart see lots of action even from top players in 1vs1 so I am not sure why in your opinion it needs a buff.
Puma and AEC are available to specific faction for specific reason so I am not sure why in your opinion it "compares" more to them.
Since it seems that you agree with my point that claim was false I am not sure why you continue quoting me.
LOL we clearly do not agree. I dont know how u can get that idea but ok |
Feel free to inform Kurobane about it instead of me, he is the one comparing the Stuart to a Kubel.
No they not "treated" as lights tanks but as "heavy armored cars".
I am not even sure why you want to argue semantics, you asked if they are light tanks and I pointed out that since they do not have tracks they are not.
Unless want to argue that Stuart should but "cannot Scout or be used for Vision" as kurobane claims, I am not even sure what is the point you are trying to make, so I suggest you move on.
(edited)
Lulz okay dude, cuz your not arguing semantics  Stuart could just use a buff, 50 sight range default would be useful but USF doesnt rly need more scout
It clearly compares more to puma and aec than to luchs and t70 tho. Call them whatever u want, if its supposed to be a hybrid of those (no?) then it should get buffed against inf |
Will not even bother responding
Even at vet 1 it gets 45 vision so it can "be used for Vision", once at vet 3 with sight 56 it can "scout" quite effectively, contrary to has been posted.
I am not implying it, I am saying it clearly, no there are not light tanks, tank have tracks, they are both armored cars.
Now can you pls move on?
But u did respond lol, soooo
The stuart is not a scouting unit, scouting units dont need to vet up just to have more than default vision... m20 literally in the same tier
Im talking about role. PUMa and AEC clearly are treated as light tanks in the game. 3 shots to kill, they punch much harder than 222, m3a1, m20, and cost much more. And having wheels vs tracks has nothing to do with vision....
|
There is a major difference between "it cannot Scout or be used for Vision" and "does not scout that well" so you should be explain that to Kurobane and not me.
Nah your post was much more misleading
It does not scout "just fine". ANd you will almost never see a vet 3 stuart so saying its gets 56 with vet is pointless
Are you implying that Puma and AEC are not light tanks? they get 50 vision... |
United States
Relic Entertainment
Oziligath 
T.R. Sidewinder 
