It’s not like I am either fully immersed or completely taken out of the game to the point I can’t play it.
Then what's the problem? At this point i have no clue what ur problem is
U concede that coh2 already has even less realistic elements. That is the central point of my argument...
Your answer is either a weak cop out or just really weird then. If those are the only two requirements, then making factions based on real armies is pretty much dead. You can have that opinion but that’s probably not what most of the community wants and what Relic is going for (besides including the BP). The large crowd that wanted the DAK for years probably wouldn’t like it if they had a King Tiger or a Panther no matter how rarely those would be encountered while playing. But that’s what you’re okay with apparently as long as they’re sufficiently rare.
If u don't think that's what relic is going for then why the fuck r u so worried about the BP??? That's completely self contradictory
I would prefer the armies not to be made up entirely of prototype units either. So far that doesnt seem to be whats happening. It seems like there's 1 prototype unit. Is that enough to make me complain? Not really
R u worried about trickle down fiction or something? Like Relic is going to get addicted to proto units and once they start they can't stop? I find that silly
I guess authentic WW2 games don’t really exist then since they all take some liberties for gameplay purposes. Maybe you can prove me wrong but I can’t think of a single game that hasn’t taken liberties that don’t always make sense. It’s more complicated than either beings authentic or being a WW2 fiction.
Im not concerned about other games, were talking about the standard across coh games. U have already admitted that US and brits on eastern front is more absurd than BP, so i dont see how my opinion is so confusing to u