Profile of thedarkarmadillo

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 5279

General Information


Thread: 4v4 balance problems since patch22 Sep 2019, 21:46 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Sep 2019, 21:44 PMelchino7 Every time this is asked, vetos are hard coded to be added automatically based on number of maps on rotations. So... If we add all the maps we get more vetos? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: STG Obersoldaten22 Sep 2019, 21:45 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Sep 2019, 21:41 PMVipper You have already cover this THE UNIT DOES NOT "almost ignores cover", and since the ST44 have very high DPS at close range one should (in most case try) to move closer than 10 where the point blank mechanism kicks in anyway. Actually Vamp obers have no to very little advantage over LMG Ober vs heavy cover in long range. Helps against garrisons doesn't it? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: allow 7 man Conscripts PPSH41 or PTRS22 Sep 2019, 21:12 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Sep 2019, 19:28 PMLoopDloop Plz no. I wish PTRS conscripts could still throw molotovs though. No reason they shouldn't be able to; pfusies, pgrens, and recon support paras can all still throw nades when given their AT upgrades, and they have real grenades. Why would you retain the ability to do something you paid specifically for? Madness to expect such things! MADNESS! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 4v4 balance problems since patch22 Sep 2019, 14:33 PM Maps wise I'd like them to re add all the maps and add more vetos. It would be nice to play a map other than redball and port at least 1/15 games. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How are Infantrysections since patch?22 Sep 2019, 14:32 PM I'd hate to see the game watered down for the sake of time. The cover mechanic is neat, it imo just needs refined. Like I said previously, to work on a 4 man squad makes it op with a 5 man squad and to make it balanced on a 5 man squad leaves a 4 man squad lacking. Separate them and go from there. I'd really like to see more CHOICE in tailoring your Tommies individually as opposed to globally (like I would like cons) . They are pretty well the only infantry the brits get so they should be adaptable. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: allow 7 man Conscripts PPSH41 or PTRS22 Sep 2019, 14:28 PM A volks buff? Oh jeeze... What more could they give them? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Fallschirmjäger is very OP!22 Sep 2019, 13:48 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Sep 2019, 13:35 PMKatitof Does that mean will you now shut up about guards and shocks? Quards and shocks are ALLIED infantry..... So no. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: allow 7 man Conscripts PPSH41 or PTRS22 Sep 2019, 02:10 AM The whole point of the 7 man upgrade is so cons can be powerful WITHOUT a doctrine... Watering it down so it works betterwith a select few commanders returns cons to the "yea let's just shelf these lads again" pile. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 50 cal - Why is it so good? 22 Sep 2019, 01:28 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Sep 2019, 00:49 AMT.R. Stormjäger That’s true, but you’re still mostly picking shocks or IS2 or both. But you are PICKING it. You CAN play other commanders whereas the old Soviet design you were playing against yourself if you picked an off meta commander. But that's irrelevant, let's keep to the topic, sorry for dragging us off In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 50 cal - Why is it so good? 21 Sep 2019, 19:59 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Sep 2019, 19:51 PMAlphrum riflemen are the best mainline inf in the game. .50cal costs alot and comes later which is its justification for it being good. # Can someone help me confirm tho.. arnt .50cals by far the easiest to wipe? that is correct, although i suspect its a bug. they have a larger than average target size when retreating In: COH2 Balance