you missed the point its not about who's superior or what is needed the point is you telling people not to waste points on BAR's and no i dont feel back foot with rifles if i did i would post a different thing you just told people not to use BAR and use APDS instead APDS has limited effect anyway only 3% as someone else said
sheer volume of fire is far better compnaion to APDS so having 3 57mm would do more damage than 2 firing APDS and besides why do you bring the US AT gun up when the problem is the RAK
you need to work on reading comprehension mate, i said that for the cost of a bar you can turn a pair of the least reliable AT guns into a pair of the best, superior by every metric, toi which you replied you cant survive until a KT without double BAR.
again you have no rebuttal or counter argument on how RAK 43 is fair in its current state and you resorted into bringing non related topics like BAR and 57mm gun and then you called me brain dead who needs to play agaisnt bots which is nothing short of an insult but we are on the internet so who cares next time bring up good counter points not unrelated units
speaking of reading comprehension you relied to me a second time without me posting again yet... i say braindead because you are making it clear you have no idea what you are talking about despite your best efforts to reply, you are more than welcome not to, by the way... however you are right about one thing (put it in your calendar and we can celebrate it happening next year) and that is that we are off topic.
on the...off topic... the USF vet is worse than i though and it needs to be brought in line with the other AT guns, nameley its ROF, which is lower at vet 3 than other AT guns get at vet 2 and half in total... thats unacceptable. furthermore, the super shells should become cheaper either with vet or tech (perhaps with the nade tech?)
at anyrate, back to the rakk.....