Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Feedback on UI changes of the game16 Sep 2019, 23:15 PM Suggestions: Soviet Defensive tactics commander: Rename "Tank traps" to "Antitank defenses", since it includes both mines and tank traps now. KV-1 rename "hulldown" ability to "Russischer Koloss" (Russian Colossus) since it has a different mechanism than the ostheer ability. In: Lobby
Thread: Inconsistencies16 Sep 2019, 23:06 PM Tech requirement for Ostheer doctrinal vehicles is really messed up: Puma build-able from T2 Stug -E call-in needs CP 5 and BP 2 CP IV call-in needs T3 or T4 and CP 7 Panzer J build-able from HQ needs T3 or T4 Instead of this confusing system make all of the build-able from HQ and give the tech requirement as needed for instance: Puma T2 or PB2 Stug -E BP2 CPzIV T3 or PB3 PAnzer IV J P3 or PB3 In: Lobby
Thread: Mobile Defense Doctrine16 Sep 2019, 22:52 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Sep 2019, 22:23 PMaerafield as Tobis already mentioned, the real issue of the old doctrine was being able to skip t3 and t4 just by getting some pumas to shutdown the light vehicles, followed by a very fast command p4 to finish the game. This isnt possible anymore with CP4 requiring t3. If people would just spam pumas again they have 0 tanks and extremely delayed tech This is commander design issue/consistency and not a balance issue. Having Puma (build-able in t2), CPzIV (call-in) and Panzer J (build able from HQ) all having different ways of becoming available makes little sense and confuses things for no good reason. Having to built T2 to get access to an doctrinal vehicle make little sense, is rather unique and very restrictive. All 3 units can become build able from HQ and have different tech requirement. That will make them more consistent while increasing built diversity at same time. When it comes to the commander design I had pointed out that no tech call-in with good AT and good AI should not be available in the same commander a long time ago. Actually in order to fix commander one should set some rules and redesign many commanders. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Mobile Defense Doctrine16 Sep 2019, 21:53 PM Both Puma and CP4 where nerfed to oblivion because of this commander. These 2 units should simply not be in the same commander. Then both of them could be re-balanced. Both units could become build-able from HQ like Panzer j with the Puma requiring requiring BP2 or T2 and the CPzIV requiring PB3 or T3 or CP restrictions. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: su76 need adjustments16 Sep 2019, 21:47 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Sep 2019, 21:02 PMMazianni This doesn't really justify the massive recharge time for most of the SU-76's existence. The cost of the ability could also be increased via vet at that point, or the recharge, or the barrage ability replaced by a unique ability with the damage adjusted to compensate. A vet 0 or vet 1 SU-76 definitely shouldn't be having to wait over a minute to fire again (for 35 munitions) At vet 2 Su-76 get a -25% recharge bonus, tt also gets more range at vet 3. Before even touching the vet bonuses of the SU-76 one has to increase the XP value which is simply too low. The barrage ability is a cost efficient ability. Jump back to quoted post16 Sep 2019, 21:02 PMMazianni This also goes to point out how dumb the damage veterancy is. This is damage that honestly should be in the main gun at start, especially if this is going to cause so many problems for its other core abilities. Not really, that simply show that when MOD team changes the AOE values of the unit they balanced it around vet 0 and not vet 2, (as many other things). Units should simply be balanced in all vet levels. I am pretty sure one can make vet bonus damage only to autofire not barrage actually. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: su76 need adjustments16 Sep 2019, 20:58 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Sep 2019, 15:59 PMrqd Sorry that I didnt read your post carefully, but it seems that since last year's update the barrage of su76 is using the same dmg/aoe/scatter/cost data as that of zis3's. It has been a 6 shot zis3 barrage with 80 seconds recharging time then, so vet2 incresed damage has nothing to do with the barrage. The barrage was free serveral patch before, but now it costs 35 mu, it is not fair for it to have such a long recharging time like howitzers. The barrage get the extra damage and becomes more lethal at vet 2. I ca actually kill models with first shot while the one from zis can not. At a costing about the same as grenades make the ability very cost efficient. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Fallschirmjäger is very OP!16 Sep 2019, 20:55 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Sep 2019, 16:29 PMelchino7 Do you have a DPS spreadsheet for new Shock values? As i said before, you can't do more DPS if your accuracy values are over 100%. You can benefit by been able to do THAT amount of dmg against target which have RA or benefit from cover. I used the exported xls file. Value are for vs Target size 1. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: su76 need adjustments16 Sep 2019, 15:26 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Sep 2019, 15:12 PMrqd Its only +20 damage, makes it 140 dmg per shot, only good vs lights, like 3-shot the 400hps. Its far pen now is 160, no guarantee to pen ost p4, hard to say it can be effective against mediums when not in numbers. As for ostwind, it may simply lose to it in a duel. puma with vet is much better with maneuverability and sight range and damage and survivability. su76 has good pen and range, but thats what a td without turret and armour should have or it will never be used. I was taking about the barrage. The difference in damage for barrage is substantial at 125%, it one of the cheapest weapons with a kill radius. It AT capabilities are actually fine and it not only good vs lights. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Fallschirmjäger is very OP!16 Sep 2019, 14:54 PM Shock troops with For mother Russia have around 104 damage at 10 and 42 at 15. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: su76 need adjustments16 Sep 2019, 14:44 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Sep 2019, 14:41 PMrqd That barrage is not really handy. Yes it fire 6 shots at 80 range, but you dont always have the time window to finish it, usually your opponent will react in time , move the squad away and send at gun or light vehicle to drive you off. Then the super-long ability recharge time makes it pain: it is 80 seconds cooldown, post patch howitzer has only 70 seconds cooldown. zis-3 barrage has max range 60, fires 4 shots with 30 sec cooldown in contrast, way more easy to use. The SU-76's barrage is simply superior after vet 2, it does more damage. In: COH2 Balance