Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: MHT flame barrage reduce scatter rng?9 Feb 2020, 15:09 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Feb 2020, 14:36 PMKatitof MHT burns buildings and has great AoE in comparison that lasts much longer then ZiS barrage. You're comparing apples to oranges. Zis barrage take outs building faster (should be able to destroy many wooden bundling in 2-3 shots). Actually allot unit are currently too powerful vs ambient buildings. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Su76: Any chance for it to be looked out?9 Feb 2020, 15:07 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Feb 2020, 14:25 PMHannibal But it's not cost effective anymore. ... I personally would love to have SU-76 as OKW. Imo the units is cost effective there as simply better option for the Soviets. The reason I mentioned the Elephant is simply because some people seem to think it can only deal with light vehicles when that is not the case when in numbers. Another advantage when in numbers is that if they are kept apart the can hit the read armor of units trying to dive. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Winter balance (1/2020) feedback - UKF9 Feb 2020, 14:40 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Feb 2020, 14:22 PMSupport Sapper i just did some test and find out that at vet 0, officer can barely win stumpio with just 1 model left and alway lose to pg (officer cloe in in the open). Comebine that with the test vs axis mainline, i can confidently say that the unit's power lever when out of the box is completely fine, unles you consider the fact that ukf have an limited to only 1 unit that can have a fair fight with stumpio at vet 0 is "that strong". I provided my personal feeback and you did yours. Have little to add. Well Tighrope seem to agree with me that the units is a "weapon". Imo the unit would allot better if it was more about utility than brute force. (About ST, imo it would be allot better if the ST was not the starting unit for OKW. I would personally experiment with an MP 40 VG and swapping the MP-40 with the ST44.) In: Lobby
Thread: Winter balance (1/2020) feedback - UKF9 Feb 2020, 14:08 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Feb 2020, 12:54 PMblvckdream There were only tests of vet 0 Ass-Grens vs vet 0 Assault Sections. ... they where 3 test Ass. IS vs Assa. Gr. Assa. Gr. won 2 with one damage model left. Ass IS won 1 with 4 model lost. That is RNG. They seem to be pretty close. In: Lobby
Thread: Winter balance (1/2020) feedback - UKF9 Feb 2020, 13:59 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Feb 2020, 13:24 PMLago I think it's the extra man that's doing it. That's a big power spike for a squad like that. Part of the problem. The units was moved 2.5 earlier and become available for 200 manpower less. It simply does not need to be that strong. Imo tt should be closer Ass IS and have extra utility (anti garrison) with an incendiary grenade (VG style). Then it could become T0 unit. That would help vs garrison and countering Ass. gren. In: Lobby
Thread: Su76: Any chance for it to be looked out?9 Feb 2020, 13:55 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Feb 2020, 13:20 PMHannibal I think the SU76 has a efficiency problem. Against OST you don't buy a 75 FU unit to counter a 222 or 251. Against OKW you might use it against a Luchs. However, the SU76 is still more expensive. Also the T70 can scare a Luchs away if necessary and brings very good AI to the table. Against a Puma it's not worth building it, because it can be killed too easily if it gets caught out of position, while it itself can't dive the Puma. So what is left for the SU76 in it's primary role as AT unit? Osteind. Would eork alright, but just get a T34 instead. Against StuG it does not work that well. Against P4 it's too unreliable so you'd need another AT unit anyway. It's not worth delaying your own tank that heavily. So the only role that is left is if you're massivlely behind on furl, your opponent get's a tank out on the field and you can't afford teching to T4. Then your only hope is to get the SU76 and hope that you can somehow kill the P4 to narrow thee gap Su-76 can take out most vehicles when in number. According to test someone did (do not remember currently) they could take out an Elephant (3 or 4 if I remember correctly) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 5 men for OST9 Feb 2020, 13:52 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Feb 2020, 13:04 PMHannibal ... They have mediocre main line by design and exceptional support weapons to compensate... That was the original design, currently the gap in support weapons has closed especially for USF. In: Lobby
Thread: Winter balance (1/2020) feedback - UKF9 Feb 2020, 13:05 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Feb 2020, 13:03 PMblvckdream https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHCZntDLfOA starting at minute 14 there is a series of UKF officer tests vs grens volks obers pgrens etc. Thanks man. In: Lobby
Thread: Winter balance (1/2020) feedback - UKF9 Feb 2020, 12:59 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Feb 2020, 12:57 PMSupport Sapper there are not much time when you can make those kind of combinations. That is little to justify the flare and it the combo is very easy to pull. In: Lobby
Thread: Winter balance (1/2020) feedback - UKF9 Feb 2020, 12:57 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Feb 2020, 12:54 PMblvckdream There were only tests of vet 0 Ass-Grens vs vet 0 Assault Sections. No tests of vetted 6 man Ass-Grens vs vetted Thompson Assault Sections. Well given that UKF design they do not actually have to be better than "assault grenadier", I am not sure why they lose since their stat are comparable and should be about equal fight might had been RNG or test parameters. Actually I use the doctrine allot in 2vs2 and it already quite good, one should be careful with buffing them. In: Lobby