Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: IR 251 Half-track 2014-2020 RIP!11 Apr 2020, 22:00 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Apr 2020, 21:43 PMWAAAGH2000 Maybe can make IRHT can reinforce near infantry like other HT Stock mobile reinforcement for OKW does not sound like a good idea. I would rather have it a toggle ability that it stop (or move at slow speed) and mine sweeps so that it allow SP to do other duties. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Penals - Why snares?11 Apr 2020, 21:38 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Apr 2020, 21:13 PMTaksin02 vehicle push. yeah it should never cause engine damaged change to long stun effect like heavy gammon bomb maybe? A temporary weapon disable should be enough, the stun can easily lead to stun lock and make the situation worse. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Penals - Why snares?11 Apr 2020, 20:47 PM Imo all satchels should have the engine damage remove damage alone is enough to keep vehicles away. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: IR 251 Half-track 2014-2020 RIP!11 Apr 2020, 20:10 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Apr 2020, 19:55 PMthedarkarmadillo Which is fine. The unit is supposed to be set up. Less passive shit more playing the game is a better way to.. Play the game... Set it up and you'll see the enemy coming a mile away. They flank you then tough shit, that's counterplay innit? 80 vision 360 on the move would be a tad OP... I do not disagree about the abilities that is why I like the Sneakeye MOD better. On the other hand the unit could easily have 42-50 sight as other reckon vehicles do when moving. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M15A1 AAHT11 Apr 2020, 19:43 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Apr 2020, 19:35 PMLoopDloop Stationary suppression and high damage is still easily worth the unit's cost. Probably shouldn't have suppression on the move to begin with. Thing already shits on ostheer, no need to make it come even earlier. Well you can see the flame I got already, now imagine what would happen if the suggestion come without a price decrease. Any my point is that imo if one want it in late to counter Stuka loiters it rather pricey and could use a price reduction (maybe mostly MP) if it make to oppressive in early game one should probably tone it down a bit so that it remains a cost efficient option in early game and worth building as an AA unit. Unit should be balance around it primary role which is AA. Alternatively one could offer a discount after major unlock. In: Lobby
Thread: IR 251 Half-track 2014-2020 RIP!11 Apr 2020, 19:08 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Apr 2020, 19:00 PMthedarkarmadillo ... How exactly are you struggling to keep a unit that can see further than any mobile unit can shoot alive exactly? The unit sight is 35 when mobile it has to set up to get vision and that is only directional. Even 251 has better vision on the move. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M15A1 AAHT11 Apr 2020, 17:40 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Apr 2020, 17:23 PMEsxile Aim of the topic: first nerfing the suppression on the move then nerfing wathever possible after that. Can we drop the conspiracy theory? Making the unit more consistent in AA is actually a buff and reducing price and the micro is buff also. In: Lobby
Thread: Winter patch Buglist 11 Apr 2020, 17:20 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Apr 2020, 16:52 PMOsinyagov .... Can you please elaborate this part, i didn't get the idea. ... Keep this nice budges (with the letters) for the unit portraits but use an SMG symbol and an AT rifle symbol for the units icon similar to other units. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: M15A1 AAHT11 Apr 2020, 17:15 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Apr 2020, 16:59 PMLoopDloop Agreed on all except the cost decrease suggestion. It would be too oppressive if it came any faster in the midgame. Also it does not need AP rounds it already dumpsters light vehicles if micro'd correctly lol. Also wish most of the suppression got shifted to the MGs instead of the cannon, because having it mainly on the latter makes it incredibly inconsistent at times. The reasons I suggested to be cheaper are: It rather expensive if one needs AA only I also suggested removing the suppression that would justify a price decrease Finally if the power level is too high simply lower it so that one can afford AA. In: Lobby
Thread: M15A1 AAHT11 Apr 2020, 16:35 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Apr 2020, 16:14 PM\|GB\| The Lnt.599 How about no and you just position the damn thing right when you want to shoot a plane. You will be fine. There is little reason for this particular vehicle to need more micro to counter planes and I guess it quite frustrating for less experience players to try to figure out why their AA vehicle does not fire on planes. Actually AA mode was available when the unit was introduced I really did not see any problem with it and nave no idea why it was removed in the first place (I am not sure but maybe it was simply removed because it was a vet 1 ability instead of becoming vet 0). Finally as I explained by making this weapons separate one can balance them separately and it will not end being Up or Op when when they change (take for instance quad that is currently OP as an AA) Jump back to quoted post11 Apr 2020, 16:14 PM\|GB\| The Lnt.599 On more serious note, i feel like the supression on the move is actually fine in this case since its not 360 degree, and you have to put in quite a bit of effort of keeping the AA moving the right way. Unless you're a smart brain and have a key with reverse+click scripted on your mouse which makes reversing and using the AA significantly easier ^^ The unit can be quite frustrating to maneuver and reverse as toggle can probably help. In: Lobby