Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Could CoH 2 do with a cleanup patch?12 Apr 2020, 20:29 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Apr 2020, 19:50 PM__deleted__ One thing that has been greatly overlooked is tooltip accuracy. Besides obvious typos, there are many commanders, intel bulletins, unit descriptions, upgrades, abilities etc. that are wrong, at times being even empty! It would be easy to identify them, make a list and fix them. I would gladly contribute. As they are right now, they make the game look very unpolished, while at the same time making it hard to new players to get started. check this: https://www.coh2.org/topic/93861/feedback-on-ui-changes-of-the-game In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: UKF-Valentine12 Apr 2020, 20:21 PM Valentine has a great gun which is superior to that of the Command PzIV specially after it got a damage buff without any change in AOR profile. It gets crazy vet bonuses in mobility and target size. And for some strange reason it remain a call in with no tech requirement. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Penals - Why snares?12 Apr 2020, 19:08 PM Penal should have an AT weapon to prevent vehicles from pushing them. It should simply not cause engine damage. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: UKF-Valentine12 Apr 2020, 19:07 PM the weapon doctrinal vehicles become available is mess and it should be fixed. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Command Panzer IV12 Apr 2020, 18:41 PM The unit has no reason for so many limitation. It should either have CP only and not tech requirement or tech requirement and not CP requirements. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Could CoH 2 do with a cleanup patch?12 Apr 2020, 15:55 PM I agree. There simply a large amount "low priority" issues that needs fixing and wil benefit the game allot more than a(nother) meta shift. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: M15A1 AAHT12 Apr 2020, 10:09 AM the AA mod change is quality of life change and not a balance change what other faction get for AA is irrelevant. In: Lobby
Thread: Are the patches making this game progressively worse?12 Apr 2020, 07:10 AM Patches improve the game constantly. There are problems with the processes thou. Many times band aid solution are used and they keep pilling in so when a "real" solution comes there is a stockpile of band aids than are no being removed. Classical example is the WC51 that got a tone of buff because it was taking up commander slot on its own. Then it was "fixed" into "mechanized group" and now you have a single ability that gives access to: 2 transport vehicles, mark target and an off map making other HT call ins look pale by comparison. Imo there should a number of patches the focus on fixing this "lower priority" and increase the consistency of behavior across units, abilities and commanders. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Penals - Why snares?12 Apr 2020, 07:03 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Apr 2020, 00:56 AMelchino7 If the AT satchel didn't do engine damage, everyone would just run towards the Penal, wiping it with their own explosion and in the case of medium tanks, just crush them over. You don't necessarily need the main gun to kill infantry models (i'm not sure if weapon disabled crit, affects MGs). That problem comes from the fact that AT satchel and satchel use the same weapon profile. The should use different ones. Satchel has no reason to cause engine damage and AT satchel has not reason to have large AOE and high friendly damage. Without the friendly damage I doubt people would risk that high damage just to push around Penal. If is prove a viable tactic one can change the weapon disable to a effects similar to USF AT mines. There is no reason for having 1 shot engine damage snares. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Penals - Why snares?11 Apr 2020, 22:02 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Apr 2020, 21:52 PMAlphrum if they didnt have snare, ppl would just dive ther tanks into the penals at close range It could do damage and weapon disable but not engine damage so it a soft snare. One shot snare where removed from other infantries for a reason. In: COH2 Balance