Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: stuka zu fuss needs more RNG in it9 Nov 2020, 19:50 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Nov 2020, 19:46 PMShadowLinkX37 I remember when they added scatter to the stuka and it made it twice as OP. The best rework would for it to launch its rocket in a circle similar to the firestorm barrage. Although I don't know how you'd be able to influence the rocket placement because theirs so few. So unless the AoE was buffed a good margin and the OHK radius lowered along with damage, I don't see how the stuka could be changed from the way it is. The rocket AoE currently evaporating tanks is just the cherry on top. That is not an accurate description. The weapon has zero penetration so it will do 40 damage on a direct hit with hitboxes but has high AOE penetration and will do lots of damage from AOE to hitboxes. This is oversight and it should be fixed. Personally I would rather see incendiary barrage/smoke barrage as standard and HE barrage with tech (either upgrade or buidling) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: More maxims9 Nov 2020, 16:15 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Nov 2020, 16:09 PMSpoof Damn, you're right. I totally forgot about the flamer halftrack, I don't really take 4v4s that seriously. I thought the Command P4s infantry gun would be useful but I guess I always overestimate that thing. The gun is average to bad. Valentine has a gun that is better both in AI and AT In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Pak 43 shooting through elevations/houses9 Nov 2020, 13:11 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Nov 2020, 12:12 PMProtos Angelus I'd agree it's underused in 1v1 and 2v2 due to the nature of those mods. However, from my experience (3v3), pak43 is used in pretty much every game. Of course, it's my problem that I only play random teams so coordination is not the main deal in those games. I mean, last 4 games my teammates left after losing one squad: "gg, we lost, you suck" and then disconnect...some top 20 3v3 players no less. All in all, giving pak43 better survivability/clearing blockers would be more "normal" than have it shoot through buildings on it's own. I have not seen so many pak43 in 3vs3, maybe it more map deepened? Suggest you try priest. It completely counter the pak43. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pak 43 shooting through elevations/houses9 Nov 2020, 11:39 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Nov 2020, 11:34 AMProtos Angelus Wouldn't this be a better option? I guess one could test but I think pak43 is underused already so I see little reason to go through the trouble. Jump back to quoted post9 Nov 2020, 11:34 AMProtos Angelus Also, what kind of clear obstacle do Sappers have? Clear obstacles that small explosive they have. Also available doctrinal to assault engineers and Pioneer via upgrade. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pak 43 shooting through elevations/houses9 Nov 2020, 11:26 AM I am under the immersion that the shooting through obstacles thing is a lesson form COH1 where the 88 there was some difficult to use since in many cases it would not have a clear line of fire. The same issue is less of problem for the UKF since their sapper can clear allot of world objects and create a clear line of fire. If one removed the ability to fire through objects for the Pzk43 one would probably have to provide the commander with pak43 the ability to clear obstacle. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: MG42 over performing 9 Nov 2020, 11:22 AM What I have noticed is that HMG do not set/fire/change window properly and this is a relatively new thing. It might be more often in the HMG-42 or the HMG-42 might suffer more form it due to poor traverse speed but I think it has to all weapons. And it is not seem to be simply an animation issue. https://www.coh2.org/topic/106751/hmg-bug In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Gren G439 Nov 2020, 09:02 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Nov 2020, 07:44 AMMr. Someguy Hm, I thought the G43 was a popular upgrade, so what is wrong with it? power creep In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pak 43 shooting through elevations/houses8 Nov 2020, 20:22 PM Yes shooting through obstacles is intentional. On the other hand UKF can clear allot of obstacles with sappers. There is not need to change either design. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sturmtiger OP AF8 Nov 2020, 20:18 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Nov 2020, 19:33 PMProtos Angelus I won't bother providing the replay since I won't bother. That bug saved my captain + rifleman. I witnessed it bugging out on a model that was hugging the sturmtiger. It fired, recoiled but the shell landed on the infantry model in front of it, killing only it (no AOE dmg). That's what I witnessed. Only it does not check it cheat mode. The shell probably hit the environment and not the entity. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sturmtiger OP AF8 Nov 2020, 19:05 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Nov 2020, 18:36 PMKatitof Source: A failed attempt of having it overshoot 2 squads by having them hug its front, leading to direct hit that also got st itself in the blast. Care to provide a replay? Because once more as far as I know entities do not collide with projectiles. In "even 1 infantry model on its way, it'll explode on it" you should be able to recreate quite easily. In: COH2 Balance