Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback15 Dec 2020, 15:50 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Dec 2020, 15:48 PMProtos Angelus Then ISU should get 400 armour and a commander ability similar to spotting scope? Why are you asking me? I have not suggested that Elefant should have 60 range HE rounds. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback15 Dec 2020, 15:46 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Dec 2020, 15:31 PMNapalm Still looking for an Elephant adjustment similar to the treatment the ISU152 received. Are you asking for Elefant to get HE rounds that have range 60? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] USF Feedback15 Dec 2020, 15:07 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Dec 2020, 14:41 PMMMX read post 215 pls. Buffing USF mortar to be better or equal than ostheer one is a step in the wrong direction and contrary to faction desing. The range difference is of little importance. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] USF Feedback15 Dec 2020, 14:36 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Dec 2020, 14:10 PMSander93 The barrage is being changed, not the autofire. Same applies: https://www.coh2.org/file/19127/barrage-clumped-te.png USf have little to no reason to have superior or even equal mortar with Ostheer. Espcailly since the Pak howitzer is the best "mortar type" weapon. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] USF Feedback15 Dec 2020, 14:01 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Dec 2020, 13:43 PMMMX uhm... i don't remember having concluded anything like that. in fact, the proposed change would bring the m1's performance roughly on par with that of the grw34, as apart from the 5 range difference both mortars would end up with essentially the same combat stats. You have a comparison of mortar autofire and the Ostheer/USF mortar are very close, buffing the USF mortar will make it superior. https://www.coh2.org/file/19125/auto-wide-te.png It would be great if you run the number again including this change and check the result. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Osttruppen Discussion and Feedback15 Dec 2020, 13:23 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Dec 2020, 12:06 PMHannibal This is literally the intended design and has not been an issue for years now. Ostheer has seen many metas and many with Gren builds. It was working many year ago but it does not work anymore and that is why grenadier are problematic although they have been buffed. If you want to debate Grenadiers this is not best thread and we can do it another. Jump back to quoted post15 Dec 2020, 12:06 PMHannibal Also Osttruppen work as intended, they just appear to be a bit too strong in the current meta. Ostt are strong but that does not mean that they ostheer faction should become the only faction that has to invest in tech to have access to their doctrinal CP 0 infatry, especially since there are other option available. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Osttruppen Discussion and Feedback15 Dec 2020, 11:36 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Dec 2020, 11:35 AMKatitof Its meant to and balanced around it. That's a simple fact. This is why HMG42 is T0, that's a simple fact. Nope it is not balanced. If it was Ostheer player would not have to playing only commander that allow them to skip grenadiers. Jump back to quoted post15 Dec 2020, 11:35 AMKatitof If you want to play mainline spam faction, ost is not it, that's also a simple fact. Once more, these feedback threads are not about what I want it about improving the game. That is also simply fact that you have fail to understand so far. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Osttruppen Discussion and Feedback15 Dec 2020, 11:34 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Dec 2020, 11:03 AMHannibal Ostheer teching is barely comparable to teching of any other faction. "Faction X has this, faction Y needs it too" barely works here. This is irrelevant to teching argument. Ostheer's mainline infatry arrive later than all other faction. That is simple fact. The end result is that when the move for the first engagement they are in worse position although their are defensive infatry. That is one of the reasons Ostt are even worth while, they allow Ostheer to hold ground early. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Osttruppen Discussion and Feedback15 Dec 2020, 10:51 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Dec 2020, 10:47 AMKatitof They were literally NEVER meant to. That's why their T1 is so cheap and quick to build. That was fixed by having strongest HMG in game arrive first. Osttruppen are still call-in. They just require T1 to be built in that suggestion. I suggest you at least try to understand before responding. If you really having trouble understanding let me explain this for you: Call in infantry come from outside the map and not the base building. That makes their arrival map related. This is of little importance for CP1/2/3 infatry but it crucial for CP 0 infatry even more so for Ostt whose saving grace is their caping power. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Osttruppen Discussion and Feedback15 Dec 2020, 10:44 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Dec 2020, 10:20 AMJibberJabberJobber To clarify: they wouldn't be build from T1, just require T1 to be called in, so the first Osttruppen / AG squad would still arrive at the same time as live, because the recharge starts at the start of the game, not once T1 is built. Thanks for the clarification I misunderstood. So Ostheer not only will not have mainline infatry available from T0 as other faction have, but they will now not even access to Doctrinal T0 unit without T1. That make little sense especially since some of the problems Ostheer actually have start with having their mainline infantry arriving the latest. Moving them to HQ is a far better solution since their timing will be the same regardless of map. In: COH2 Balance