Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: calliope? no, calliOP !!!!! 3 Feb 2016, 13:03 PM As I pointed out when this commander come out it proved problematic... The commander is badly designed allowing UFS player to Blob while being able to easily counter enemy blobs. The Calliope is also over performing having to much firepower and well it survives allot. It cannot be counter by most artillery and it costs as much as most vehicles that can chase it down, so sending medium tank to counter is not a cost efficient counter. Further more the crew mechanism allows it to: bypass pop limit bypass upkeep bypass commander when given to other players... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Suggestion on Bulletin overhaul...30 Jan 2016, 12:51 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Jan 2016, 12:22 PMPablonano 1- make bulletings to not stack according to Relic they will stop stacking... In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Suggestion on Bulletin overhaul...30 Jan 2016, 12:16 PM Since bulletin stacking is described as "bug" and the system will received an overhaul I would like to make some suggestions: 1) bulletins should be invisible to enemies, reason: they tent to give away one's strategies. 2) there should be around 4-5 bulletins for every common unit. reason: There are more EFA armies bulletins and if duplicates don't work anymore EFA will have advantage in bulletin selection over WFA. 3) total bonus should be around 10% allowing one to sort custom design his army to his needs... reason:Currently benefits go from 15-5, it should become more standardized... 4) maybe make an option to attach bulletins to commander especially bulletin that affect doctrinal units.... reason: This will make bulletin for doctrinal units easier to use especially for units that can only be found in 1-2 doctrines. Jump back to quoted post28 Jan 2016, 17:55 PMCuddletronic Intel Bulletins were never intended to be stack-able. This issue is going to change. Thanks In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Miragefla's December Balance Mod Additions27 Jan 2016, 15:14 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Jan 2016, 14:41 PMNorthWeapon It already got a buff, this would make it into a terminator unit that can't be killed until mid game My point was instead of the increase in fuel cost and buff, to start with a change in the weapon profiles be more similar to infantry LMGs or the bren carrier LMG... In: Modding and Tools
Thread: Miragefla's December Balance Mod Additions27 Jan 2016, 11:59 AM Another issue with the 222 is that imo it uses the wrong profile for its weapon. A 222 will win against most infantries (non AT) if it move to close distance but that is negated as soon as At snares become available. The weapon should use revers profile so that the 222 had an advantage at long range. In: Modding and Tools
Thread: Bulletin that do not work26 Jan 2016, 13:50 PM bulletin that no longer provide any bonus: Ostheer "Get to the guns" cheaper upgrade no longer applicable... USf "Veteran medic" recharge ability no longer applicable... Bulletins that do not work: Ostheer "Shoot for the starts" affects no Ostheer units... work only the pak howi according to Cruzz (wrong type of unit and 4X the bonus) Bulletins Borderline useless: OKW "The harder you fall" dispatch for unit limit to 1 "Sharpen those claws" penetration for unit with 100% against all allied vehicles There allot more that are pretty bad but I tried to keep it limited those that are extremely bad or not working... In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: 22226 Jan 2016, 10:09 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Jan 2016, 10:00 AMpugzii I only said that in regards to your buffs in relation to fuel costs. If the 222 was 50 fuel with your ideas, then that's great. then post that the fuel cost should be increased and not the "dramatic aspect" .... What you posted made you seem like you where totally against the idea... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Churchills need the old armor back26 Jan 2016, 09:45 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Jan 2016, 09:00 AMKatitof TBH this is one of the rare cases, where tripwire flares are more useful. REs vet1 looks good until the moment you realize it works only for SMGs, not for brens or piats, where it would be really appealing bonus. It might be a matter of personal preference but I would take around 18% DPS over "trip fire flares" any time... If it applied to Piats the cooldown would have little affect but the reload would be simply broken... If it applied to brens It would provide around 25% dps again broken for a vet 1 ability In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Churchills need the old armor back26 Jan 2016, 08:53 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Jan 2016, 20:12 PMKatitof Which applies only to their default weapons, which aren't optimal for fighting in cover. We can't have them having useful vet1, can we. I would personally take "-30% cooldown WHEN IN COVER,+50% Reload WHEN IN COVER" over "trip wire flares" or "field first aid" is most cases. Further more a vet 1 bonus heavy engineer with no movement penalty as suggested would be able to close in enemy unit go in cover and would clearly over-perform. Vet abilities and bonuses must be looked at but Royal Engineers vet 1 bonus would be toward the end of the line... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Churchills need the old armor back25 Jan 2016, 10:52 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Jan 2016, 10:20 AMJohnSmith Gosh, no need to be that passive aggressive and trolling. I kindly asked that the values were, and I did not expect to be redirected to a telephone book of change log (without even a link to anything) I'm sure someone else will be friendly enough to post these. Cheers! No need for you to be aggressive-aggressive and call others lazy for not doing what you can do and when: 1) Katitof was already "friendly" enough to post some of the stats and Kamzil118 was also "friendly" enough to quote them in this page as pointed out to you. I am going to be friendly enough to quote once more "And that was OLD 1600hp 300 armor churchill." and more changes like price can be found in changelog... 2)link ask requested http://www.coh2.org/topic/4307/company-of-heroes-2-changelog/page/2 http://www.companyofheroes.com/blog/categories/updates 3)posting consequence post that contain no information related to the topic could be considered trolling. Jump back to quoted post25 Jan 2016, 10:29 AMLatch Come on man, War speed is bad but Tigers and Kings using Blitz is ok? Not saying you think that but you didn't mention it Id rather see the fighting 'buff' of the engies gone but the repair speed stay if I had to make a choice, they move far to slow to really be effective at anything but camping. Blitz gives less bonuses to to heavy tanks...even to a panther...I said remove because being able to use "war speed" in allied tank should not be allowed...I also suggested to be toned down if it stays similar to axis heavies... I have made a thread about engineers and the ability both to fight and repair, it could be separated by giving the repair boost to engineers equipped with minesweepers and make weapons and minesweepers mutually exclusive. if you want to see check here: http://www.coh2.org/topic/46004/the-op-utility-of-engineers In: COH2 Balance