Profile of aerafield

k

^

Does the matchmaking system consider player skill? It seems like my winrate has been very low for quite some time now. Shouldn't I be playing against worse enemies at some point, or does the matchmaking system not consider player skill/winrate?

The matchmaker only looks at the ELO number, which is hidden for us unfortunately. But if you are rank 1 on Wehr 1v1 ladder for example, it means you have the highest ELO number out of all wehr 1v1 players.


The "search radius" or how you wanna call it, gets bigger and bigger the longer your search.

So if I am rank 1 for example:
In the first minute, the system looks for mates and enemies within the top 10 approximately.

In the second minute within top 50 approx., in the third within top 100 etc etc.

If no match was found within 8 minutes, you get dumped into a complete random match where it's possible that your teammates are rank 10.000 and the enemies top 200 & vice versa.

So basically it is the most expensive non Doc Rocket artillery , but is overall the worst one.

Damn, I must have missed the patch that allowed panzerwerfer, katyusha and calliope to pinpoint-accurately wipe pakhowies and mortars on max range in the fog of war when they have to finish their firing animation before packing up... same for HMGs and AT guns ofc.


Or which allowed them to arrive at the 7 minute mark like the stuka does.

Who is faking ranks???

I am top 5 and I can take on any player in a teamgame mode, I can assure you that. Do I always win? No ofc not, I get outplayed too at times.


You are top 50 and you can't take on the most basic players. Just yesterday you ragequit after 10 minutes because I pushed back your blob 1 time even though your team had half of the map, and today you got owned by a mediocre wehr player even though you had the 2v1 advantage most of the times. See the difference?

And I'm done arguing for now, feels like Im standing in front of a white wall and a person wants to argue about the color of the wall, saying it's not white at all.

You Mr.Rank#1, when are you going to show people your pro plays in a tournament?

Like this?

•  
  

  1

  VS

  [NS] aerafield [NS] YGNOW [NS] Brickman

  coL HelpingHans VonIvan SturmTigerGaddafi

  NS vs HelpingVonLuvMan R2G2

  by: aerafield map: Unknown

  1

  -

Though I dont know why someone would need to participate & flex in tournaments in order to be a good player???

I just put these 2 pictures here, should explain everything







This is what annoys me the most about random teamgames. These insanely boosted <50% winrate players just as yourself who are "top 50" even though they play like rank 1,000 with the exact same build order and strategy every single game no matter what map or enemy faction. I know so many people who think you are a god-awful player, to a point where they instantly leave the match as soon as they see your name in their team.

Heck I don't mind if someone is low ranked, it's not his fault that the matchmaker gave me him as teammate. But it's stupid that horrendous players can rank up simply by spamming enough games and then they get manhandled by much lower ranked opponents.

And yes it's indeed absolutely mindblowing that I was able to tank 2 entire OKW players for 50 minutes while you and the other brit were brainAFK for the entire game vs one wehrmacht player, I mean just look at the wehr K/D & damage. It would have made 0 difference if I went middle with teammates as this, they would have just flanked me from my side with 6 panthers while you guys do nothing

http://www.companyofheroes.com/leaderboards#profile/steam/76561198084516650

http://www.companyofheroes.com/leaderboards#profile/steam/76561198159844807