Profile of SkysTheLimit

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Ostheer T2 Skip23 Jun 2019, 17:02 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Jun 2019, 16:54 PMFarlion Yeah. You're making an argument to nerf a particular Ostheer strategy that is incredibly easy to counter. So go ahead and explain it then. Saying "it's not an issue you just need to play better" is a massively useless contribution In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Teamgame Resource Inflation23 Jun 2019, 16:58 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Jun 2019, 03:53 AMthedarkarmadillo 1s and 2s are for balanced play, 3s and 4s are "lose 17 t34s because ramming them into tanks is hilarious" or "convert every building into an FRP and death blob across the map" Even 2s have inflation to a degree. Take a map like rails and metal. There's 4 points for each team that almost never change hands just due to the sheer distance you have to go to harass them. I think the more static territory control in teams is the biggest reason for inflation In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostwind's penetrations23 Jun 2019, 16:46 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Jun 2019, 16:27 PMWiderstreit You seem not to understand satire. Or your satire just sucks? And made your point less clear? You made multiple serious posts on this page so idk why you couldnt just answer his question In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostwind's penetrations23 Jun 2019, 16:25 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Jun 2019, 15:33 PMWiderstreit In same, where a P4 is cheaper and Ostwind has more pen than a T34. I don't know where your reading that but even the OP didn't say anything that crazy. I don't agree that the ostwind is too strong but it could probably use a price increase. At most it's too strong for it's price They buffed a great deal of different stats on the unit, that usually means it shouldn't be the same the price as before. Just make it 100 fuel. It's very very strong now, seems plenty worth it In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Teamgame Resource Inflation23 Jun 2019, 02:54 AM What about just reducing the income per point flatly in team games? Like 1 less fuel and 2 less muni or something like that? Maybe even more in 4v4 Only reason I say that instead your percentage idea, is because I think the inflation isnt just from the # of points. I think some other ppl on the forum have said this, but a lot of it comes from how much less often some territory changes hands compared to 1v1 Also i dont think all larger maps necessarily have more points. Some of them just have larger territory for each point i think, but i could be mistaken. Havent gone higher than 2v2 in a while In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostwind's penetrations23 Jun 2019, 00:39 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Jun 2019, 00:11 AMKirrik It's useless on half of the maps due to mere fact it's turretless. Try winning a direct engagement with 400hp/70 armor It's cheaper than a vast majority of the targets it shoots, (including ostwind) it does plenty well for it's cost. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostwind's penetrations22 Jun 2019, 19:15 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Jun 2019, 17:38 PMKirrik "Real situation" proved my point entirely - No it didnt, when are you going to understand that wasnt a real situation? Until you or someone else posts a replay/clip FROM AN ACTUAL GAME we havent seen a real situation. All that video showed that a t34 being micro'd brainlessly can lose two 2 ostwinds, assuming there are ZERO other units on the field. That's a real situation in your eyes? Of course, Sander already told you this, so who knows whether or not you'll listen this time In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostwind's penetrations22 Jun 2019, 17:09 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Jun 2019, 16:56 PMKirrik It's only the matter of time before people start abusing/spamming Ostwind same way they did JLI, then we'll see whether or not I was right about it I would love to see how ppl will manage to spam a 90 fuel t3 vehicle like they spammed a 250mp cp 1 infiltration squad... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostwind's penetrations22 Jun 2019, 16:58 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Jun 2019, 16:55 PMKatitof Umm, you DO realize that AEC is anti tank vehicle, not anti infantry? Dual AEC can't do anything that dual PUMA can't do even better. What does this have to do with anything? The point is that the AEC is cheaper and can be used to fight the ostwind. If the Ostwind can lose to AECs than its AT clearly isnt THAT good The puma is wildly irrelevant to this discussion In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostwind's penetrations22 Jun 2019, 16:48 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Jun 2019, 16:45 PMKirrik What if it's a team game and teammate gone T-70? Well this opens about 5000 other what ifs. What if the other teammate is British? Get some AECs (see sanders video). The US at gun will rip an ostwind apart as long as you dont let yourself get circled. Its ROF makes OSt t3 its favorite targets. Get a video of this happening in a live game, that will do more for your argument then any more of this theory crafting. In: COH2 Balance