1s and 2s are for balanced play, 3s and 4s are "lose 17 t34s because ramming them into tanks is hilarious" or "convert every building into an FRP and death blob across the map"
Even 2s have inflation to a degree. Take a map like rails and metal. There's 4 points for each team that almost never change hands just due to the sheer distance you have to go to harass them.
I think the more static territory control in teams is the biggest reason for inflation
In same, where a P4 is cheaper and Ostwind has more pen than a T34.
I don't know where your reading that but even the OP didn't say anything that crazy. I don't agree that the ostwind is too strong but it could probably use a price increase. At most it's too strong for it's price
They buffed a great deal of different stats on the unit, that usually means it shouldn't be the same the price as before.
Just make it 100 fuel. It's very very strong now, seems plenty worth it
What about just reducing the income per point flatly in team games? Like 1 less fuel and 2 less muni or something like that? Maybe even more in 4v4
Only reason I say that instead your percentage idea, is because I think the inflation isnt just from the # of points. I think some other ppl on the forum have said this, but a lot of it comes from how much less often some territory changes hands compared to 1v1
Also i dont think all larger maps necessarily have more points. Some of them just have larger territory for each point i think, but i could be mistaken. Havent gone higher than 2v2 in a while
No it didnt, when are you going to understand that wasnt a real situation? Until you or someone else posts a replay/clip FROM AN ACTUAL GAME we havent seen a real situation.
All that video showed that a t34 being micro'd brainlessly can lose two 2 ostwinds, assuming there are ZERO other units on the field. That's a real situation in your eyes? Of course, Sander already told you this, so who knows whether or not you'll listen this time
Umm, you DO realize that AEC is anti tank vehicle, not anti infantry?
Dual AEC can't do anything that dual PUMA can't do even better.
What does this have to do with anything? The point is that the AEC is cheaper and can be used to fight the ostwind. If the Ostwind can lose to AECs than its AT clearly isnt THAT good
Well this opens about 5000 other what ifs. What if the other teammate is British? Get some AECs (see sanders video).
The US at gun will rip an ostwind apart as long as you dont let yourself get circled. Its ROF makes OSt t3 its favorite targets. Get a video of this happening in a live game, that will do more for your argument then any more of this theory crafting.