I assume he means AA halftracks that can suppress Panzerschreck squads at long range rendering them useless and the rest of the army mostly defenseless once they've retreated. Without Paks or 222s Ostheer can't do anything against a well microd AA halftrack.
In which case I dont see how its a problem for them being force to spend 200mp and 20fu to "back-tech" for AT guns. If I went LT for US I need to spend 200mp and 35fu just to unlock the AT gun if I later decide I need it. Sovs spend 160mp (?) and 20 fu if they went t1 to do the same
And remove the Rak right? Cause if you use the Rak with stealth creeping, its OP as hell. If you try to use it as a normal AT gun, its terrible. They shouldnt get access to both
I wonder if SuperHansFan posted this thread when penals were buffed and replaced cons complaining about powercreep. "Just so SU can fight volks so we need penals." I'm sure he didn't have a problem with that. But now SU's days of one-upping grens with penals is largely done since its counterpart pgrens have been buffed. Oh he isn't happy about that. "Just so Ost can keep up with double upgraded WFA troops without having disparity in vet levels"
He literally said nerf penals AND pgrens. And you found a way to see that as biased...
Someone cries and want to hard-nerf Ostwind, you are biased, because you don't debate words in the other thread. Maybe you didn't read everything, than it is even more bias.
Are you blind? I posted in that thread a ton, mostly defending the buffs... What are you talking about
Same comes to USF: 10 or 15 fúel for access to Lu's or cap vehicles.
Its 20 fuel to unlock the vehicles in LT or Cpt tier, not 10 or 15.
Yes, you are comparing apples to oranges. The 200mp and 20 fu you are talking about also comes with the 222, 251, and pak40. You can't isolate that to just shrecks, that's ridiculous
Also I have no clue what you're talking about with the t70. You pay for it's tech building...