Yes, as a pseudo bug-fix, not as a balance change. Balance changes are intended to change how the game is played, at least to some degree. This change won't impact anyone's use of either the M36 or P4.
Jesus Christ whatever. I don't care what you call the change, you can debate the grammar all you want, it changes the game. Period
It's certainly not the same as fixing a bug though, idk why you're saying that
Furthermore, the entire point of the forum is to discuss ideas/suggestions. Since I don't think (not going to check) anyone's said "no, -20 armor is a bad change", this thread would've stopped after the 5th reply.
No way to know. Instead it got filled with stug buff requests after like 1 page
I made a thread about buffing the stug a month ago. It's annoying to see people complain about units not on topic, especially when you just made one about that pretty recently...
I generally defend my WStukas better; they aren't dived on in the first place.
Lol what? I'm talking about people sending tanks all the way to my base to try to kill it. What the hell does that have to do with defending better? I can't put mines on every single approach
Because for the last few pages you've continuously implied that I've been trying to change the Puma into that.
WHAT? Are you kidding me? I haven't even said anything remotely close to that. I wasn't even understanding why you were talking about it, how can I be implying what you're saying if I'm still trying to figure it out???