Profile of SkysTheLimit

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Are sections perfectly fine?29 Apr 2020, 04:04 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Apr 2020, 23:11 PMKatitof Top players and balance team seems to have a different opinion on this. Jump back to quoted post28 Apr 2020, 23:36 PMFarlion And now most top players and parts of the balance team feel Sections are too good, making the brits busted. Who'd have thought. Can people on this forum please provide some fucking links to the place where we can read these opinions? If your gonna cite someone else's opinion, cite them. In stormjaegers thread a couple days back he actually cited miragefla You guys just cited pros saying two different things In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why on earth do sections need 50% moving acc? Seriously.29 Apr 2020, 03:57 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Apr 2020, 02:54 AMFelixTHM Not agreeing with 100% but sprinting Cons are still much more valuable since they have snares. That's what made Vet 5 PFusiliers such bullshit last patch. Increased snare range and passive sprint...WTF Which is one of the reasons it's already more expensive than agren sprint. I only brought up it's price because he thinks 10muni is unreasonable for a cp0 cqc squad Ass tommies and assgrens have multiple different abilities, i don't understand what OP is trying to get from these comparisons In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why on earth do sections need 50% moving acc? Seriously.28 Apr 2020, 22:26 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Apr 2020, 22:23 PMIncendiaryRounds Nope, I meant to nerf them to the point where they'll lose to grens when charging from max range and then giving them sprint so now they'll be entirely dependant on sprinting or ambushing to win an engagement. Currently agrens can't afford to charge rifles or sections despite costing the same so they're entirely dependant on abilities. The other CQC infantry can actually afford to charge grens and win. So you want to make all the factions the same? Lets give allies Tiger Aces and Panthers? Let's make the maxim just as strong as MG42! Maxims only advantage is faster re-positioning, aka it requires more micro. Do you see the problem yet? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why on earth do sections need 50% moving acc? Seriously.28 Apr 2020, 22:19 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Apr 2020, 22:11 PMIncendiaryRounds Seriously, then why don't we make ass tommies use the F key or Cav rifles, or ass engies, etc. iT's jUsT aN F kEy, wHat'S wRonG? You want Cav rifles to have sprint? A squad that has an AT satchel? You want ass engies to have sprint? With a flamethrower also available? You are an absolute clownshow lol In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why on earth do sections need 50% moving acc? Seriously.28 Apr 2020, 22:09 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Apr 2020, 22:06 PMIncendiaryRounds So Ost players have to micro harder than the other factions for no extra reward. Yeah hitting that F hotkey is so fucking difficult. Lawl In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why on earth do sections need 50% moving acc? Seriously.28 Apr 2020, 22:03 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Apr 2020, 21:59 PMIncendiaryRounds It's useful in lobbing nades, but cons have at nades and molotovs so its equally useful. Agrens have a small window to take advantage of its DPS curve with sprint. Again, oorah is already cheaper. Not to mention mollys and at nades require their own fuel to unlock, so your argument about cost effectiveness is nonsense How many people do you need to tell you 5 muni sprint is a terrible idea? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why on earth do sections need 50% moving acc? Seriously.28 Apr 2020, 21:58 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Apr 2020, 21:52 PMIncendiaryRounds Yeah, and if u do the math, 5secs for 10 munis, oorah should cost 20munis. And I've seen cons oorah backwards to safety to counter agren sprint. Con DPS curve is far more generous than agrens. So they spent 15 munitions to counter your 10 muni. Your "math" is completely ignoring the fact that sprint is more valuable to a cqc squad than one with bolt actions.... Jump back to quoted post28 Apr 2020, 21:52 PMIncendiaryRounds Stock ability is more cost effective than the doctrinal ability? Nothing to see here. Just a typical day for Ostheer. Only in your crazy world In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pioneers after early game28 Apr 2020, 21:49 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Apr 2020, 20:26 PMHannibal I have never said that pioneers should be potent fighters. But OPs point was that OST pios cannot really get vet after the midgame, which I find to be true. Giving them higher vet bonus helps only if it can be reasonably reached. Okay well you compared them to replacing lost cons, which you replace in order to fight. Late game replacement engineers are for clearing mines, repairing tanks, and maybe placing more mines if its a long match. None of those things benefit from veterancy anyway, except repair speed which you now get a bonus for if you buy the sweeper I say RA bonus since they currently get none at all, and I agree they should get XP from doing engineer tasks In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why on earth do sections need 50% moving acc? Seriously.28 Apr 2020, 21:41 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Apr 2020, 20:19 PMIncendiaryRounds Doesn't oorah last for 10secs though? Yeah which is why its already more expensive, not to mention cons are also carrying bolt actions... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why on earth do sections need 50% moving acc? Seriously.28 Apr 2020, 19:50 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Apr 2020, 18:41 PMIncendiaryRounds Why not make sprint just 5munis? Seems all Ost infantry requires more micro than their counterparts. Lol Jump back to quoted post28 Apr 2020, 18:41 PMIncendiaryRounds If we have micro harder, at least make the abilities have a reasonable cost. Oorah is 15 munitions. Are you on crack? In: COH2 Balance