Do you have any other way to argument than insulting people? no?
I'm in a good mood today so I'll pass on it for once and try to respond to you. Let me recall what I wrote:
Pioneer don't get destroyed by riflemen even if they can't win otherwise nobody would use them to cover their HMG flank. I let you do the test, go in cheat mode place a RE behind yellow cover and rush it with a RM, then do it vs Pioneer and see what happen.
Hint, the 80 manpower difference shows its effect on the RM vs RE match, not the RM vs Pio.
Now, its just an example on why USF early game doesn't perform correctly, I'm not even saying RM vs Pio is problematic, I say the cost difference is problematic. RE, RM are not cost effective and associated to lack diversity in combat options and super slow teching design.
Pioneer absolutely do get destroyed by Riflemen. I've literally told you the stats. It's also available on https://coh2.serealia.ca/#
. There's no range at which Pioneers can hope to win, and they absolutely get roflstomped in almost all real-game situations.
Sturms cost 20 more than Riflemen, win 60 to 70% of the time vs Riflemen.
Riflemen cost 80 more than Pioneers, win 100% of the time vs Pioneers.
I never once disagreed with you about REs, I've always been targeting your obsession of spreading fake news and using false information to make your points. The reason I hate you so much is that across all the years in this forum, you use false information 99% of the time.
You're intentionally using an unfair test to make a completely false claim. Why would I test Riflemen rushing in vs Pioneers into the best combat range for the Pioneers? Riflemen outdps Pioneers by 650 to 700% at long range. Why would I rush in and take a 25% advantage instead while losing accuracy running in? That is obviously the most biased test possible.
This is basically equivalent to claiming that Grenadiers are underpowered, and then you do 100 cheat mod tests where they rush into close range vs Riflemen sitting behind cover and the Grenadiers lose 100% of the time.
You are intentionally using Pioneer's best possible engagements with Riflemen being used inefficiently on purpose to claim some bullshit point about Riflemen not stomping Pioneers.
I've already destroyed your intellectually invalid arguments completely about 250 posts ago. I insult you because you deserve it, because you are dishonest and despicable in using false information.