Profile of Esxile

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1

General Information
Steam: 76561197961387624


Thread: DBP USF thread10 Nov 2017, 07:27 AM [Edited] Ups, didn't see the last patchnote, remove my comments on the Jackson. I'll try the new stuff this week-end.. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Is OKW the Final Boss In This Game?9 Nov 2017, 19:24 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Nov 2017, 19:13 PM__deleted__ Tell me why OKW deserves better HMG when this is already the best HMG they can think off Cuz Vipper said so? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: HMG-34 in DPP 8 Nov 2017, 13:29 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Nov 2017, 13:20 PMzarok47 Then you would need to seriously buff the rak aswell, 60 range to start and the RoF to match the american ATG. Rak is shit, having it next to the current mg34 is asking for a baserape. Ofcourse yes make it a clone and remove the camo, the retreat button, the garrisoning and its vet5 In: Lobby
Thread: HMG-34 in DPP 8 Nov 2017, 13:16 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Nov 2017, 10:36 AMzarok47 50 mp difference, the need to fight lv's (besides the AAHT in the same tier) and a teching choice (eventho devm has shown time and time again going LT>captain works and okw needs the truck set-up before getitng a mg34)) is enough to jusitfy the huge performance difference between mg34 and 50 call? I'll take 50 more mp for more damage, better suppresion and a lovely vet 1 ability (sprint). Knowing that when you face a HMG.50 you'll not see a Stuart or atgun anytime soon, I guess yes it is. On the other hand, OKW have access to raketen + HMG.34 + whatever you decide to go, T1 or T2. Now I guess that if you want a HMG.34 as good as the .50, Devs will need to put it in T1 and Raketen in T2 so you can't have both at the same time that early. I'm not sure if it is something that would fit that well OKW design. In: Lobby
Thread: December Balance Preview8 Nov 2017, 10:57 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Nov 2017, 01:10 AMIntelligence209 Vasa and his followers should be ignored as I’m sure they are. as for that cartoon picture that’s 100% accurate. The community is dumbfounded on the panther nerf. With a half ass buff to make up for it. Yet everyone is wrong except the 3 team members Vasa probably play better than you Ostheer and OKW so I don't really understand your point. In: Lobby
Thread: BDP Garrison and ungarrison changes - Do we like them?7 Nov 2017, 18:29 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Nov 2017, 14:47 PMMr.Smith Garrisons, then, become completely useless, as unlike sandbags (which protect you better), there are often not enough windows for your entire squad to fire from. Garrison could offer other bonus as vision and accuracy till your opponent reach you wall. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: BDP Garrison and ungarrison changes - Do we like them?7 Nov 2017, 14:20 PM When your enemy reach your wall, Windows and walls aren't anymore protection you. Why not simply remove the defensive bonus for garrisoned unit when your opponent reach your building wall? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: DBP USF thread6 Nov 2017, 17:57 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Nov 2017, 15:49 PM__deleted__ What if I told you that bar on echelons has better dps than on rifles. Echelons vet faster and feed less Echelons have smoke and flamer to counter garrison. Echelons have 5 men in squad Echelons have supression fire ability to supression anyone Echelons have captain on me to counter supression tools Echelons cost 200 MP (far more spamable and replaceable than riflemen) and repair tanks, construct cover and mines They are tool for every occasion Do I need to continue ? So why nobody spam Echelons today? Why when VonIvan did it vs Noggano (I guess it was vs Noggano I don't remember exactly) during the final Faction showdown USF vs Ostheer didn't he completely dominate him? Even the first match with the surprise effect he won thanks to victory points, 20 points more and it would have been over for him. Oh yes, because you've been butthurt and thus, unable to admit it you can only accuse RE to be too strong. Hey you know what, too bad you're not anymore a strategist specialist but anyway why don't you show us a couple of replays where you dominate your opponent with RE spam. But before that, allow me to remember you what was my proposal: exchange smokenade with Flamethrower. I don't care if FT takes two slots or not, I want something balanced so if it need to take two slots, it is fine. I don't care if we decide to disable BARs ont RE to make sure we can't make an army of RE, it is fine as well. I repeat myself, I'm not looking for an OP solution, but a solution for USF to clean building like any other faction do. Or look, I'm not stubborn, give RE flamnade if you want. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: DBP USF thread6 Nov 2017, 13:34 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Nov 2017, 12:08 PMVipper Try building 10 Pioneer, 10 CE or 10 SP and test how well its going to work for you. Having strategies that allow cheap units to be spammed and actually being effective creates more problems than it actually solves. Engineer type units imo, should augment core infantry units and provide utility and NOT be able to replace them. On a 2vs2 with another player supporting you, and using a new feature (RE smokenade) to see if it works. It works too well doesn't mean that RE without smoke are good. RE are carrying flamethrowers since more than a year with the Riflemen Doctrine. Have you ever see a spam RE+flamethrower taking place since then? no. Do you think nobody thought about it and try it? Of course people tried it, and of course it doesn't work well so nobody does it. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: DBP USF thread6 Nov 2017, 11:39 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Nov 2017, 08:31 AMVipper The point would be to demonstrate that they are not the "overexpensive trash" you describe and if one is not careful RE can become the next plague for COH2. They are, if you need to build 10 of them to do something useful, then their is a problem. And if Hector didn't see it coming, he also has a problem but that's not the game fault. In: COH2 Gameplay