Why should schwerer AA be kept free? Why schwerer shouldn't have pop cap, like the officers, making you pay indirectly, regardless if you have use for it or not?
You're trekking a thin ice here
You want to fuel starve OKW even further with side tech
Posts: 2066
Why should schwerer AA be kept free? Why schwerer shouldn't have pop cap, like the officers, making you pay indirectly, regardless if you have use for it or not?
You're trekking a thin ice here
Posts: 500
Why should schwerer AA be kept free? Why schwerer shouldn't have pop cap, like the officers, making you pay indirectly, regardless if you have use for it or not?
You're trekking a thin ice here
Posts: 600
You want to fuel starve OKW even further with side tech![]()

Posts: 2636 | Subs: 16
There is no discussion worth having in this thread. Latch never played a game as any faction other than UKF and he openly stated that Brit emplacement have too many counters.
( 15 + 25 + 15 ) MedHQ + healing
+
( 15 + 50 ) MechanizedHQ
+
( 15 + 120 ) FlakHQ
+
( 310 ) KT
=
565 fuel for kt. Now as if that isn't enough, Latch wants you to DOUBLE any of the sums in this function.
tl;dr fanboys rarely make sense.
Posts: 773
There is no discussion worth having in this thread. Latch never played a game as any faction other than UKF and he openly stated that Brit emplacement have too many counters.
( 15 + 25 + 15 ) MedHQ + healing
+
( 15 + 50 ) MechanizedHQ
+
( 15 + 120 ) FlakHQ
+
( 310 ) KT
=
565 fuel for kt. Now as if that isn't enough, Latch wants you to DOUBLE any of the sums in this function.
tl;dr fanboys rarely make sense.

1 Posts: 419 | Subs: 1
Posts: 393
I played USF before brits came out and on the odd occasion play as OST. I don't know about you but, I like a challenge hence no OKW play

Posts: 283
Instead, what I tried to do in my post was try to identify where this perceived injustice comes from: This is because the first T4 flak gun comes completely for free. If this injustice wouldn't exist, then nobody would ever give a damn about about whether the KT requires all trucks to have been setup or not.
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
By that logic, the free squads USF gets when teching up should be placed behind a side-tech wall as well. You pay less than Ostheer for your tech, yet you get more out of it. Meanwhile, Ostheer has to research AND build to tech up, actually requiring them to pull a Pioneer squad away from the front - and that as one of two factions that doesn't have any option to gain a forward retreat point to somewhat lessen the impact of this.

Posts: 283
I think that the LT could see it's bar behind an upgrade (simil to cpt) but you have to take into account that the free squads are there to compensate from not getting free upgrades through teching (faust/nade/lmgs/schreck).
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
But Ostheer teching already costs more, requires you to pull an entire squad back and takes longer. So the "free" upgrades which also are squadbound (meaning they suffer from the general squishyness of Ostheer squads and the ridiculous punishments for losing models by having outraging reinforcement costs that no other faction comes close to on their mainline infantry) are already factored into that.
Posts: 1216
Posts: 414
If we're going to make KT rely entirely on HQ trucks not being destroyed then the only acceptable change is to considerably buff their durability. No one's going to risk trucks near the front if their only non-doc call-in relies entirely on them still standing. They're not exactly durable against even T0 infantry attack.
Does it really cost more if we take into account all upgrades and tech? .....
Posts: 2636 | Subs: 16
By that logic, the free squads USF gets when teching up should be placed behind a side-tech wall as well. You pay less than Ostheer for your tech, yet you get more out of it. Meanwhile, Ostheer has to research AND build to tech up, actually requiring them to pull a Pioneer squad away from the front - and that as one of two factions that doesn't have any option to gain a forward retreat point to somewhat lessen the impact of this.
Posts: 500
I played USF before brits came out and on the odd occasion play as OST. I don't know about you but, I like a challenge hence no OKW play
Posts: 74
Latch, I played against you. I know exactly why you consider OKW op.
Posts: 1003

Posts: 190
Posts: 1003
The truck system is risky and fuel heavy.

Posts: 190
If someone want risk, it does not always pan out.
|
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
926 | ||
|
|
|
8 | ||
|
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
1 |
cblanco ★
보드카 중대
VonManteuffel
Heartless Jäger