Really? Historical accuracy? Okay. The KV1 is outdated and can be penetrated regularily by a Panzer IV.
KV-1 was outdated because of its gun, which struggled against P4s and better at range and it couldn't close up reliably, so mobility was another issue.
It was completely imprevious to P3 and P4s were upgunned to stand any chance.
Sounds shockingly familiar to CoH2 representation and dynamics.
Was supposed to say "Doctrinal solution to a non-doctrinal problem" but I was in a rush and screwd it up...
I got what you meant(non reptiles can actually understand context of the conversation even if some words are off it still comes right in the whole context instead of picking singular words and decunstructing them to make own argument look good), I've replied to what you've had on mind.
Comet on release was basically a Pershing which could be spam.
Well, it had its own critical flaw, which made it completely useless in common situations - it had no projectile and couldn't engage any vehicle in smoke at all.
I'd honestly like to hear how the primarily allied players would counter a croc backed by a firefly in 1v1. If the "big and slow" heavy tanks should have high rear armor because of that, shouldn't we buff JT rear armor to like 200? I mean it's the slowest tank in the game right?
Contrary to JT, their frontal armor is actually penetrable reliably by most axis AT forms.
In other words: Its impossible to kill JT any other way then flank.
Also, its not like JT/ele guns struggle to penetrate T34s and shermans and KV-1 and churchill most certainly do not have an easy time against P4s, they have advantage, but its still going to be a long brawl.
To kill Churchill/KV-1 you just need to park a Panther in front of it.
And for your question, JT/ele would do the job reliably, fast and with complete impunity.
1
Katitoff
jove
Katitoff
Cobra
Relic Entertainment
보드카 중대 
