Profile of Butcher

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1151

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/butcher_ger


Thread: State of the ISU-15228 Jun 2020, 14:36 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Jun 2020, 07:02 AMSuperHansFan Tightrope himself said the axis ele micro was poor Ele vs ISU play is more how you can use your supporting ATG and infantry. Allies did it better in this regard so they won. I think both units are balanced, it's a map issue when there are no flanking opportunity. That game was pretty well balanced so just only nerfing ISU/mark target/IL2 will further entrench JT/ele meta. Unless you massively nerf those doctrines too. Those stukas were raining death all game. https://youtu.be/zobVgWdbyqw?t=2447 I linked you the time. Shows everything that is wrong with the ISU. A Cromwell would have made mincemeat of an Elefant/ Jagdtiger in the same situation. Meanwhile the Panzer IV bounces most shots on the ISU (even on the rear). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Mini Patch - June 22 202023 Jun 2020, 21:16 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Jun 2020, 20:27 PMJohnSmith For your attention: Ostheer All Out War Passive Due to the nature of this issue overriding other capture bonuses provided by ability, we are removing the capture bonus. 10% Capture Speed Bonus Removed. Is there going to be a compensation for that? The buffs for Ostheer T4 were weak but as is you only get that neglegible reinforce cost reduction now. Hardly worth it. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Tiger nerf12 Jun 2020, 14:56 PM The ISU issue comes down to only one problem: It hardcounters Paks. The only effective way to deal with it is tanks. And here is where the Allied 60 range td meta comes in. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tiger nerf10 Jun 2020, 08:57 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Jun 2020, 08:10 AMKatitof If anything, sums up how broken tiger was, given how long it takes for brummbar to get that kind of score. IS-2 was never capable of these kill counts, because of comparatively high scatter. You people have to deal with this, not one half decent soviet player complained about IS-2 armor nerf, time to stop being drama queen about Tiger AI firepower not being over the level of specialist AI vehicle anymore. Point is that the Tiger currently does not perform for its cost. Any Panzer IV can rack up the kills just as well. From my experience the OKW P4 with the vet bonuses racks the infantry kills up even faster that the Tiger. Your whataboutisms about the IS-2 do not make this problem any more insignificant. Soviets just switched to KV versions. Ostheer lost it's only heavy tank. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tiger nerf10 Jun 2020, 07:46 AM Pre nerf I could bring Tigers to about 90 kills in a long match (those that last about an hour). Had some games that lastet an hour with the new patch where I fielded a Tiger. The Tigers had about half the kill count. Pretty juch sums up where the Tiger is now. You are better off with a Brummbär + Pak these days. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: UTT and the 2v2 meta - already stale?4 Jun 2020, 08:39 AM Brits as a whole are cancer design. Best standard infantry in the game with the most efficient upgrades (5 men, Double Brens) and a cancerous cover bonus. Best lategame tanks with a non doctrinal Tiger or super HP Churchills. And emplacement cancer - although nerfed - plays into this. It's way easier to screen your mortar pit when your infantry basically can't be pushed away once in cover. It's beyond good design to buff the most cancerous faction in the game while hardly buffign the weakest one that depends on combined arms (Ost). And that shit can be seen in the current meta. Game lost a lot of quality since Brits are meta again. On top of that the Tiger is out of the game, leaving Ost with no good meatshield tank. AI almost instantly switched to the Brummbär. In: Lobby
Thread: KT thread26 May 2020, 11:05 AM Every Panzer IV does Anti infantry better than any Tiger or KT. The gun needs to pack a punch against infantry. Right now it is just a paperweight that wont get anywhere once 60 range td dominate any engagement. We saw it fail miserably in the tournament (Helping Hans, Von Asten vs Thoton and that other TR guy). Simply because it was too slow and couldnt deflect hits. Sure the Axis tilted and had the KTs ass face the enemy. But still in the time it was on the field it would simply not deliver sufficient damage. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Feuersturm] MP40 and Hetzer19 May 2020, 16:25 PM Never used the Flammhetzer to great effect. The reasons being: 1. No ability to circle AT guns like the KV 8. 2. No necessity to go for the unit since the Panzer IV does the AI job just as well and arrives 50 fuel later (= 2 mins). Thus I voted that the timing should be improved. 3. You renounce the biggest power spike OKW has: The fast Panzer IV. 4. Low HP pool for a flame tank. If you are unlucky the Hetzer will go down with 4 shots. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: T4 capping bonus14 May 2020, 14:09 PM Crazy idea: What if Ost T4 actually provided decent units instead of neglegible pseudo buffs? In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Sturmtiger and ARVE23 Apr 2020, 10:33 AM The Sturmtiger with shorter range than any units sight range will never work since the awkward turretless design means any shot can be easily predicted and dodged. Imo it should be redesigned to become artillery, something like the B4. To compensate the AOE or accuracy should be lowered or the unit should be more expensive. In: COH2 Balance