Profile of Mr. Someguy

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 4928

General Information


Thread: Why this game is almost balanced13 Jun 2014, 23:07 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Jun 2014, 22:44 PMKatitof Faction of angry fanboys chanting "german up, gief buffs" will sturm your home and rip you apart for that post. It's not that, it's that Soviets are fundamentally flawed and still need to be fixed somehow. I don't know how, but they need it. M3 spam is not fun, Sniper spam is not fun, Maxim spam is not fucking fun. Not to play with or against, it's bullshit. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Remember the Flammenwurfer?13 Jun 2014, 22:43 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Jun 2014, 22:02 PMferwiner 1. It's tier 2,5 not 3 and at the same time russian HT is truly a tier 3 vehicle and it's used really often now, even when german tanks are all over the map, 251 still comes earlier and costs the same to upgrade but is rarely used. Objection! While it's true that the Soviet Half-Track comes out at T3 and it is used, it also has 3 times as much armour (28/20 vs 9/4) as the 250. As for upgrades, the Quad mount does almost twice as much damage (8.57 vs 13.38) at the FHT's max range (25m), but can fire out to 45m. The Quad does can also damage light vehicles IE the 250 Half-Track. The two are not in the same league and were never intended to be. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Hands on Western Fronts Armies13 Jun 2014, 21:48 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Jun 2014, 21:00 PMAffe No Pershing in the game very disappointed about that. Sorry our real-life Army didn't have enough Heavy Tanks to appease your taste in a videogame. If you care so much, play one of the other three available factions. In: Lobby
Thread: Dshk armor penetrating rounds13 Jun 2014, 21:46 PM You missed when I said "without any abilities" I tested them on the M3 and 221, which was without AP, both killed them roughly the same time. With AP I tested them on the Puma, T-70, and T-34 (rear) and the MG 42's API was far superior each time. The Puma and T-70 were destroyed before the ability ran out, compared to varying damage by the DShK's AP. The T-34 was brought down to near half-health before the MG 42 AP ran out. Like I said, conclusion is that DShK AP rounds are a waste and have no notable effect compared to MG 42 API. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Remember the Flammenwurfer?13 Jun 2014, 20:58 PM Why not as much as a KV-8? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Remember the Flammenwurfer?13 Jun 2014, 20:01 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Jun 2014, 19:53 PMJHeartless I too miss this bastard. Even though it would BBQ all my precious precious conscripts... The ultimate FU to maxim spam.. So true. If you drove it into a mob of Conscripts, you just got hit with 3 AT 'nades and it was dead. If you drove it into a mob of Maxims, it punished them hard for spamming Maxims. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Hands on Western Fronts Armies13 Jun 2014, 19:50 PM I don't think it was a "mistake", rather than a stand-in. I can't imagine how hard it is to find functioning WW2 vehicles. It looks like they went to a place that had quite a few, I assume they just didn't have any Jagdpanzer IV's, so they took a similar option. The M24 Chaffee is certainly interesting though, since it called by name. Possible doctrinal vehicle? In: Lobby
Thread: Hands on Western Fronts Armies13 Jun 2014, 19:48 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Jun 2014, 19:42 PMQeit Finally some comment from Relic. Where have you been this whole time? Tuning the Alpha, silly In: Lobby
Thread: Remember the Flammenwurfer?13 Jun 2014, 19:14 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Jun 2014, 18:14 PMbraciszek The CE flamethrower is terrible, at least compared to the penals' flamethrower. Tier 1 allowing units to ride the m3 is the source of all early game complaints. I'm pretty sure they use the same flamethrower, the big difference comes from the Penal's 5 SVT's vs CE's 3 Mosin's. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Hands on Western Fronts Armies13 Jun 2014, 18:45 PM Can we not shit up one of the few good threads with your stupid fanboy wars? Thank you. In: Lobby