Thnx
G43s on PGs.
Seems like a waste, true?

Posts: 3546 | Subs: 2
Thread: Ask the Strategist!9 Jan 2014, 20:18 PM
Thnx G43s on PGs. Seems like a waste, true? In: Strategy Desk |
Thread: Death to all the RNG gods9 Jan 2014, 11:48 AM
That's not even true in games that have no RNG whatsoever, so if that's your objective, you are doomed to dissapointment In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: 120mm and its uses.9 Jan 2014, 11:43 AM
Bear in mind also that you get it without building T2, hence more fuel In: COH2 Gameplay |
Thread: Death to all the RNG gods6 Jan 2014, 19:32 PM
Exactly. Eisenhower wasn't spending his time perfecting his BO or microing his snipers. He was trying to keep a bunch of egotistical prima donnas like Montgomery and Patton from each other's throats and maybe after that he would have time to wonder about what the enemy were doing. That's more akin to playing 3v3 and up with total strangers than 1v1 or 2v2 with a steady teammate, which is one reason why I do the former. I would sooner learn to surf the chaos than eliminate it In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: Death to all the RNG gods6 Jan 2014, 16:56 PM
If your plan fails because of the RNG gods then maybe it wasn't such a good plan. In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: SU 76 isn't that bad6 Jan 2014, 11:48 AM
1 is a target. 2 are 2 targets. 3 are a problem More than 3 is a reason to go try somewhere else |
Thread: Waffen SS comparison to Wehrmacht at the eastern front6 Jan 2014, 00:48 AM
Nice write up! However i suggest to leave any political words (warcrimes) out of the discussion. I don't want to dwell on it, but I don't want to gloss it over either In: The Library |
Thread: Death to all the RNG gods5 Jan 2014, 11:23 AM
You know, um…I used to think that it was awful that life was so unfair. Then I thought, wouldn't it be much worse if life were fair, and all the terrible things that happen to us come because we actually deserve them? So, now I take great comfort in the general hostility and unfairness of the universe. In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: Ask the Strategist!5 Jan 2014, 09:36 AM
I think we had it confirmed that mark target from two players stacks Do the following stack: Soviet HQ Aura? Command Tanks? In: Strategy Desk |
Thread: Waffen SS comparison to Wehrmacht at the eastern front5 Jan 2014, 09:34 AM
Basically you can divide SS Units into maybe 4 catagories: 1) What, for want of a better term, you can call "Regular" SS units. Leibstandarte and the ilk These are generally well equipped, well trained and well manned and stay that way throughout the war While not necessary Nazi fanatics - whatever that is suppossed to mean - they were certainly competant and experienced. This does not make them nice people: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oradour-sur-Glane 2) Foreign Volunteers The Regular Armed forces claimed a monopoly on conscripting Germans, and generally would not recruit foreigners. However because infighting was pretty much a Nazi specialty Himmler saw that he could build up his forces and therefore influence by tapping the resources of the conquered nations. Preference was for "Aryan" nations, but this ended up pretty broad by the end. In this you would include the Dutch, Flemings, Waloons, Danes, French, Norwegians, Swedes and Finns. Very few of these people are enthusiastic Nazis and have their own agendas (the Waloons form their own unit because the Flemings have and they don't want to be left behind). They are generally however enthusiatic anti-communists and facist, as well as anti-semitic. Initially distrusted they fight well 3) Anti-partisan units of dubious effectiveness. Some of these are late war German conscripts when the rules got relaxed, others are Balkan and East European volunteers of various types. Basically only good for anti-partisan efforts. Some of them were very enthusiastic about their work and overlap with: 4) Utter scum When you want to disgust even other members of the SS you call in a bunch of violent criminals led by a convicted child rapist http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/36th_Waffen_Grenadier_Division_of_the_SS In: The Library |