Profile of Hannibal

actually it’s good vs USF but don’t use it vs ukf, FF out ranges it and kills it in 3 shoots

I did not mean the unit itself (also not sure if the Jackson, all in all, doesn't kill it quicker than the FF). I meant that as OST, if you play against these two factions, you're usually on the backfoot with your infantry. So a StuG won't help you, you need a P4 or Ostwind for that. If Grens were a bit more cost efficient in the mid to late game against UKF and USF, StuG probably would not be a bad option (just theorizing here, haven't tested the StuG too much since the patch. Playing as USF and UKF, it did not perform too bad when the enemy could control my infantry).

nobody is gonna buy a unit that to function u have to pay with pop cap, forward pay of 200 mp and 5 fuel and constant munition for worse soviet mortart flare

Popcap cost has the positive effect that the unit is harder to fit into the army build and therefore cancerous combination with artillery is minimized.
If people are willing to pay for it depends on the effectivity and play style, you really cannot deny it that generally.
I agree that a unit that costs resources should bring a constant bonus to your army. The half track costs a similar amount of resources as a normal mortar, so it must be more than just a "flare shooting machine". Smaller standard detection radius (minmap or ghost generation as it is now) and a flare ability could make it useful.

Also just nerfing the health pool would go a long way. This thing is attrociously stable. If the opponent reacts after the first shot, it usually gets out alive as it's just not worth diving your tank for a unit that costs 200 MP and 5 FU (you can even salvage the fuel back from the wreck of the old one if you can micro it). It would also enable counter play by artillery (maybe armor nerf necessary), then even the detection radius could be higher.
But at the moment if you park it behind a shot blocker it is safe there forever.

Stug, I'm not sure what you're refering to. That KT buffs are impossible due to the community? Or something else?

Tiger and Pershing are quite well designed units, they do have an impact that forces both players to adapt their strategy around the heavy tank, allow for counter play and are potent when supported.
And they're both quite expensive.
I think the KT is a bit slow. At the moment is almost MUST win every fight, because retreat is not a real option. There once was a huge thread about the KT, I don't think we need to repeat all of the stuff here.
You can disagree with Codguy whenever you please and many of his other suggestions deserved the critique that they got, but here he started a decent discussion. He even agreed that the KT is a bit on the weak side, so at least here he's not as one sided as you make him.

should codguy be banned for spreading false stats, miss information, trolling, and spam ?

Let staff handle spam issues or pm them if you think you spotted misuse that flew under the radar. Misunformation is best combatted by stats and decent discussion culture...

so many nazi cyber warriors here

the faction is made in mind with the kt as a base unit, should we remove usf crews ? and lock it to some doc ?

... so what about both of you discuss to the topic?

As I said, I think taking King Tiger away from OKW and revamping the commanders would open Pandora's Box. There's also no reason why OKW should not get a heavy tank, and the K fits the theme of expensive elite units that OKW was initially about. We just should find a way to make it both viable and balanced again

I hope that CoH2 does not turn free to play. The player base won't grow. There were already two free giveaways, so everybody that is at least partially interested probably has the game, and basically none of them stayed for long. A FTP won't bring in new players, just more cheaters.

Also I hope that CoH3 does not go down the route of the same business model as CoH2. This game's additions, be it commanders or new factions, were plain broken at release to make people buy them. And now, years later, balance team still has to fix units because of it. It's okay to pay money for real expansions, but then I want them to be implemented correctly and not damage basically the rest of the game. Otherwise I can't play the game I paid for for several months until relic patched it back into a somewhat balanced state.
I know the strategy market is not the most profitable anymore. I'm willing to pay a bit extra if I know that the dev team handles their stuff adequately, but I won't buy something that I lnow is going to be broken later down the line.
And also the supply system, where you can earn stuff for 'free', so you would not have to pay, is a bad joke and only there to give an illusion that you couls earn the game's whole content by just playing it.

If I see something like this implemented in AoE4 or CoH3, I'm not gonna buy it until I get the whole bundle 5 years later for 10 Euros.