Profile of ZeroZeroNi

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1563

General Information


Thread: Can the stugs stun ability not require vet13 Oct 2021, 15:50 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Oct 2021, 13:47 PMdonofsandiego So you want the StUG's ability to be changed to a stun and not a blind then. I see stun and blind as being in the same boat... so..... keep it change it doesn't matter. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Can the stugs stun ability not require vet13 Oct 2021, 15:48 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Oct 2021, 14:54 PMHannibal I mean it is not mobile, but the PaK's stun is pretty good. I'd say Ost has overall decent stopping power available with their PaKs and Fausts, not sure why the StuG blind (/or do you want a real stun?) needs to be available earlier. On the other hand I also don't think that the change would cause a lot of issues, since the StuG is not a preferred TD anyway. Here's the thing, At late game with all the chaos your paks can get decrewed(pretty easily) so does you mobile stun option. In it's not like you can buy your way out of that. I see both blind and stun as in the same boat. To be fair it's not specificly the stug I wan't to buff it's just that I wan't something that can give that option an is always available either weak and risky to use or decent but expensive. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sturmtiger over nerfed 13 Oct 2021, 06:54 AM wow being able to 1 shot a T34 just because of a 5 range nerf. Seems legit. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Can the stugs stun ability not require vet13 Oct 2021, 06:51 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Oct 2021, 22:31 PMKatitof The usual, failure to use unit properly therefore it needs buffs. Did I say that the unit was lacking m8. You will give me a quote of me from this or any other post where I said the stug sucks. If you don't wanna go through the trouble I will call a shitty ass wipe for the any time you make a comment. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Can the stugs stun ability not require vet13 Oct 2021, 06:44 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Oct 2021, 18:46 PMSkysTheLimit Why is this even remotely necessary? To have a mobile stun available always. When I play allies I have the option of have mobile vehicle stuns be it guards with dp(always good to have at any stage if you can afford it), AEC/Stuart(not really ideal at late game though), Tulips(Expensive but you can have this and it's under your control). Again at late game mobile stuns that doesn't have an uncontrollable time delay on when can you use it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Can the stugs stun ability not require vet13 Oct 2021, 06:38 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Oct 2021, 18:55 PMEtherealDragon If you went AEC route you could make it so that Vet 0 Stun does the old "useless" 80 damage (or whatever it was) and then at Vet 1 it does the full 160. It's a soft buff where you get a bit more utility but it's not really game breaking because of how situational the ability is. I was thinking maybe the activation range on vet 0 is 20/25 range with shorter blind with no damage and vet1 full blind with damage. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Can the stugs stun ability not require vet12 Oct 2021, 08:01 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Oct 2021, 07:32 AMKatitof Sure, what would you prefer in return? -solution A, where StuG can stun, but does very little armor damage, like guards -solution B, where you need to be point blank for it to work or perhaps -solution C, where it has very little effect and is too risky to use unless vetted up anyway, like AEC? I suppose solution D, where you need to pay up for an upgrade first and then pay 100 muni to use it every time is also a way. Stug shot has ZERO downsides. Literally none. That's why its behind vet. A wouldn't make much sense since stugs 75mm cannon isn't an mg, so more like a large pause after it has fired. C I wouldn't mind this actually, risky to use weaker in effect but still always available. D That kinda would make stug's borderline op assuming it works like Tulips where the ability does a ton of damage(200 i think or was it 240) on top of a stun. I'd say C. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Can the stugs stun ability not require vet12 Oct 2021, 06:39 AM Many allied abilities that stun like this on mobile platforms like guards button, AEC engin stun, Stuarts point blank engine shot, Firefly's Tulips don't require vet. So I was thinking can we remove the vet requirement for stug 3's maybe at the cost of increasing it's price to 110 fule???? Or maybe slight rework the way AEC works, without vet it's weaker and with vet it is what it is. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: JP4 performance8 Oct 2021, 07:27 AM So will we see an eventual/obligatory and unnecessary JP4 nerf???? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Does the Centaur need fire suppression?8 Oct 2021, 06:32 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Oct 2021, 09:37 AMHannibal Well yes, I am quite bad at using it, no doubt about that. I also know that it demolishes infantry if your opponent does not move. If he moves, you probably won't hit though. OP's point was its suppression and the lack thereof on the Ostwind. At least that's what I get from his somewhat confusing posts. I don't think Centaur has any issue with its suppression. Infantry in the way of the ability gets usually killed anyway. i think op is just bitching about the centaur being able suppress inside smoke. Generally mg's can't suppress while you are in smoke as they lack ground attack feature. The ability is sorta similar to suppression strafes which suppresses as the targets gets hit in it's AoE regardless of what environment they are in. And also I think bitching about the ostwind. In: COH2 Balance