Profile of FelixTHM

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 503 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Why was Katyusha nerfed again?27 Jun 2018, 16:32 PM It's actually the noobo effect. This guy is basically ulumullu for Allies. There truly is balance in the force now! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The MG42 needs to be looked, the allies mg's are dog shit.26 Jun 2018, 14:10 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Jun 2018, 10:14 AMblvckdream You need to check the stats. Con target size is 1.09 Gren target size is 0.91 So it´s rougly 20% difference in RA. Plus Grens deal more damage than Cons. Which balances out the lack of HP. Which makes saying Grens are less durable than Cons because they have less total HP wrong. It's still correct. 20% difference in RA doesn't magically make up for 50% more hp. RA doesn't help against explosives or flame either. You're just disagreeing to be disagreeable, which is what you always do. I already established upfront that Grens have better damage output, which is why they're described as glass cannon. Glass = less durability Cannon = better offense Grens have more firepower but are less durable overall. I'm not claiming one is better than the other. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The MG42 needs to be looked, the allies mg's are dog shit.26 Jun 2018, 08:50 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Jun 2018, 06:14 AMEsxile They have the same amount of HP than any other line infantry, so tell me how could they be less durable. Allied wiping potential have been constantly erased in the last patches, today you really need to be lucky, or to have bad luck, to get your gren squad wiped with a single shot. 4 man squads have 320hp. 6 man squads have 480hp. Given that you need to retreat with about 80hp left (2 half health models) so the squad isn't wiped, Gren squads have to retreat after taking 240 damage, while the similarly priced con squad can take about 400 damage. Cons do have a target size of 1.087 I think, but that's not even 10% increased RA in exchange for 50% more health. Grens have great damage output but have the worst survivability amongst mainline squads - pretty much everyone who plays this game regularly can agree on that. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The MG42 needs to be looked, the allies mg's are dog shit.26 Jun 2018, 04:59 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Jun 2018, 00:13 AMFiresparks they are the least durable line infantry in the game. Sure they are at least more durable than the support weapon but that's a low bar. Don't feed the troll. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: conscript veterancy and their lack of weapon upgrade24 Jun 2018, 14:42 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Jun 2018, 14:19 PMMittens Long story short: Grens and volks get long range weapons as well as grens getting upgraded longrange. Rifles/Cons/penals (stock/core inf) dont get long range but get compensated with more men......But that means you'll lose 1 man on approach to be combat effective, 2 after you get into cover less you get flamenaded or riflenaded. The problem is that these units lack the long range firepower (without m1919 but even that is trash now) and or lack fair compensation for having to get in close. IMO either a cost reduction to reinforce or simply making them harder to hit (slight adjustment, nothing large) might make them easier to close the distance to be combat effective meaning we can leave vet alone. Whether the compensation is "fair" depends on the map and the type of engagements it leads to. I noticed you tried to sneak in Rifles and Penals into the conversation about Cons - as if Rifles needed any help. Penals also chew up Volks, fyi. The main problem with USF is the teching structure and AT access - and buffing Riflemen would be the incorrect way to fix that. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The MG42 needs to be looked, the allies mg's are dog shit.23 Jun 2018, 15:26 PM One of the Axis units is better than the Allied counterparts. Game is broken. We've all seen this post before - it'll basically never stop coming back. I'm willing to bet that even when all 5 factions have exactly the same units with exactly the same stats, there'll still be people complaining. We could be playing Soviet mirror matches and this dragonul dude would still find something to whine about. "My conscripts are underpowered, your conscripts are overperforming, it's obviously imbalanced!" In: COH2 Balance
Thread: GCS2 Barbarossa faction win rate22 Jun 2018, 16:53 PM How did the myth of the "terribad IS2" even begin anyway? KT armour with much better mobility and turret traverse makes it super hard to kill. Sure, I agree that it's the worst heavy tank offensively, its scatter and reload are bad. But it costs far less than KT and it doesn't have the KT's horrible immobility and turret traverse - it's an excellent spearhead tank. It's a perfect complement to Soviet T3 play, and high ranked streamers use it/encounter it fairly often. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW HMG3415 Jun 2018, 13:37 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Jun 2018, 07:53 AMEsxile What an amazing ATgun that can bounce shot on Pz4 even with tugshot... Oh yes! If it didn't bounce vs P4s it would be beyond OP. It fires WAY faster than all other AT guns and has very good aim time. It's the best mid game AT gun vs lights and mediums, and I'd take them over ZIS and Raketen anytime. When it comes to the heavy vehicles, ZIS and Raketen aren't that reliable either and raketen especially dies in 1 shot anyway. Being best vs light and mediums and probably 3rd best overall among 5 factions isn't a problem - it's needing to tech Captain for it that is the pain in the ass. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pgrens seem like they have been flipped on their head12 Jun 2018, 16:39 PM It was better than before. Doesn't make it better than Luchs or T70. You're clinically retarded, obviously. Slightly better than before = better than vehicles costing more than double the amount. Sure. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pgrens seem like they have been flipped on their head12 Jun 2018, 16:07 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Jun 2018, 15:40 PMroll0 Bofors countering ost light vehicle play? lol If you honestly think the 222 is not OP for 200mp 30f your axis tinted glasses are rather thick indeed. You know it now does more reliable DPS than a 60f luch or 70f t-70? Bren carrier is 260mp and m20 is 280mp for reference. 222 is OP You might want to actually play some Ost before talking out of your ass. Not sure how badly you're playing for 222 to cause more damage than Luchs or T70. I've killed 222s with the .50cal or with double barred rifles. Previous patch people hardly built 222s (unless they really wanted to lose). Sure, it's annoying when facing 444 when the opponent micros his LVs well. But it's insanely hard to micro Scout Cars made of paper, and if my opponent keeps them alive, he deserves credit. In: COH2 Balance