Profile of thedarkarmadillo

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 5279

General Information


Thread: State of Heavies12 Jan 2020, 18:44 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Jan 2020, 18:35 PMEsxile Then they'll be too expansive for their price and people will stop using them. People will also complain that their vet is unreachable etc... Imo Heavy should have never been more that a better version of premium medium tank as the pershing is. Well I mean, if we are overhauling them and reworking their vet we could (bear with me on this) rework their vet REQUIREMENTS too! If more power is gated behind vet their true potential would come from scaling and preserving them so they could be cheaper and hit a bit sooner. If we're talking about a rework any aspect can be reworked. Trying to fit performance to a fixed price point is where many balance issues reside. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Cancer That Is Soviet Field HQ12 Jan 2020, 18:25 PM 20% better at 50% more cost and the additional pop. And a doctrine choice... My money is still on the 82mm but yes, let's move on In: COH2 Balance
Thread: State of Heavies12 Jan 2020, 18:23 PM I really don't want to see pop cap nerfs. Imo they are already too high and it puts a lot of weight on them HAVING to be obnoxious. I think I'd rather them start weaker and scale more dramatically. This would also help fix the awful team game float where taking loses knocking out a heavy tank that's just replaced instantly and it being a terror if you lost anything knocking it out. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Cancer That Is Soviet Field HQ12 Jan 2020, 16:09 PM They both do 80 damage per shot. Even if the little mortar does half the damage in one hit than the the 120mm it's still got the next one coming quicker. It's a zook v Shrek style scenario. The Shrek is undeniably better, but the zook has more potential dps. Because it shoots more. And hits more. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Cancer That Is Soviet Field HQ12 Jan 2020, 14:49 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Jan 2020, 09:05 AMVipper Read previous posts, it has been argued that the PM-41 is better at taking out OKW truck than the HM-38 something I doubt is true in a realistic in game scenario. Put them both at 80 range and the 82mm will deal more damage because it hits more accurately and more often. The reason the 120 is better more often is the range more than anything. No one is saying the 120mm is bad. But in the ranges it can be used the higher dps of the Lil guy is simply better. I guess it comes down to preference. Now, if you will, this is extremely off topic and has gone on long enough. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: State of the Sturmtiger12 Jan 2020, 13:32 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Jan 2020, 06:17 AMSkysTheLimit So what would the cap be, 3 or 4? 2 is to low imo. 4 leaves most full health allied squads with at least a man left if not two, I guess that could work? I meant 3 idk why I prreed 2. But 4 could work as well. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: State of the Sturmtiger12 Jan 2020, 03:21 AM Not sure how to milk a terror eapect out of a unit that isn't a threat. "instead of spending my fuel on steady damage and vehicular supremacy thanks to my HEAT shells I have decided to shoot the ground around your infantry every 2 minutes! Bwahahahahahha!!!" In: COH2 Balance
Thread: High moving accuracy on Panzerfusilier G4312 Jan 2020, 00:40 AM Guards makes sense, they have 6 models by when upgraded only 2 shoot on the move, thus the high output from those rifles. Perhaps swapping them with SVTs would be a nice change, even if just a cosmetic one In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Cancer That Is Soviet Field HQ11 Jan 2020, 21:12 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Jan 2020, 20:12 PMVipper The HM-38 has a better AOE/Scatter area ratio again I suggest you test this in Cheat MOD and see for yourself. HM-38 is very effective vs OKW trucks. Nobody is saying it's ineffective. We're saying the little mortar is more effective. Yes the AoE of the 120mm is wider but the increased ROF and accuracy of the little lad is simply superior for chopping dowm buildings. Shooting more often and dealing full damage more often > shooting less, hitting less but dealing more damage when it misses. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: State of Heavies11 Jan 2020, 20:51 PM Yea as far as the is-2 goes... Now that it's finally reliable cannon I think it's other traits are over performing. The armour and range combined with the reliable gun makes it a bit much. Lowering its armour slightly (350? 325?) and changing its vet around so it actually has to USE its armour would be nice. In exchange maybe making its cannon more unique--modifiers vs structures and vehicles as it vets so it stands out a bit without being too op against infantry perhaps? In: COH2 Balance