Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: OKW overhaul discussion1 Jan 2019, 16:13 PM This is an older suggestion with allot of changes: This another approach to OKW aiming at retaining to original design of aggressive truck use that has been lost its strength with the change to FRP. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Brit cancer emplacements regiment1 Jan 2019, 16:12 PM The counter barrage ability need to go from this commander. It is better suited for arty commander anyway. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW overhaul discussion1 Jan 2019, 16:10 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Jan 2019, 12:12 PMSander93 ... 1. Tier 4 - Schwerer Panzer Headquarters tech split ... Imo all truck should have upgrade providing more HP armor so that they are cheaper to replace and the player can choose the amount of resource he wants to invest in them. Ober do come to late. Jump back to quoted post1 Jan 2019, 12:12 PMSander93 ... OKW Opening combat power ... Imo the VG ST44 could be replaced by the m40 one and the incendiary grenades by normal. In addition SP could replace 2 St44 with 2 MP 40 and have the cost and pop reduced. The extra 2 ST44 could come as an upgrade. Jump back to quoted post1 Jan 2019, 12:12 PMSander93 ... Rakettenwerfer 43 ... Moving why cloak should be removed from all ATG. The problem is with RW thou is that crew die to easy and reaction times are way to high. The unit should simply fire truck faster and I would even trade penetration for deflection damage. Could also be locked behind 1 truck set up. Jump back to quoted post1 Jan 2019, 12:12 PMSander93 ... Command Panther ... The problem with the unit is more of fighting vehicle than a support vehicle, more of Panther ACE with mark target than a unit providing bonuses to other unit. The unit could easily lose the mark ability and trade support bonuses for DPS. Further imo more all aura should be separated into an passive and active part. Jump back to quoted post1 Jan 2019, 12:12 PMSander93 ... King Tiger ... Toning down the penetration vet bonuses at max range of allied TD would also help is unit allot. Maybe allow it be called in 1 for each t4 truck? (allowing multiple t4 truck?) Jump back to quoted post1 Jan 2019, 12:12 PMSander93 ... SdKfz 251 "Stuka zu Fuß" ... Redesign as a hard counter garrison and emplacement with incendiary rounds firing 2 time, so that T2 has better anti-garrison tools. Even consider swapping with wefer since it fit the faction better (later model) Artillery [recon] Flares (Special Operations Doctrine) Simply increase CD by allot Jump back to quoted post1 Jan 2019, 12:12 PMSander93 ... 7.5cm le.IG 18 Infantry Support Gun... At this point would be tempted to swap with Ostheer mortar for a more mobile option for OKW. Then it could be buffed to better suit ostheer superior support weapons. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sturmpionier 1 Jan 2019, 11:23 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Jan 2019, 11:05 AMblancat RE sten gun have low dps Strumpio is more stronger than them 5man and good vet? that is not important thier gun is trash and just support CQB in the battle(can be not mainly) strumpio have high dps mid-close dmg and can be use combat unit with volks Even they can use shock grenade in vet 3 Do you want some more power for "free CQB SUPER PIONEER" ? Jump back to quoted post1 Jan 2019, 11:09 AMLeOverlord Echelons are armed with M1A1 Carbines. Great rate of fire, but the unit itself has terrible accuracy. Also the gun is semi-automatic. On the other hand, Stumpioneers are armed with StG44 Assault Rifles. Obviously better rate of fire, and they can fire on the move. Assault Rifle vs Semi-automatic Rifle, the Assault Rifle wins. PLS read my post understand it and quote me only if what you are posting has any relevance with the quoted post. I did not compare Ro.E. or R.E. with SP. I responded to a claim "builder/repair units do not have great veterancy" and proved to be wrong. In addition the OP is talking about the veterancy and not the unit. Jump back to quoted post1 Jan 2019, 11:09 AMLeOverlord Does the 5th Echelon improve the unit's battle effectiveness? Not at all, unless armed with BARs or LMGs. Yes of coarse it does it increase DPS and HP by 25%. When it comes to "fighting" vet bonuses Re.E get +20% accuracy -23% received accuracy, -20% weapon cooldown Increases the squad's size to 5 and that is allot. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sturmpionier 1 Jan 2019, 10:44 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Jan 2019, 10:40 AMKatitof Spios also get combat bonuses. Difference is, in comparison, as you mentioned, SP bonuses are actually good. They aren't assault troops and they won't be. Also, I completely and utterly disagree on the vetting part, they vet decently fast and I never had problem with getting them to vet 4-5 reliably, unless I overextended and lost them, which didn't happened often anyway. Stop trying to dig out a problem that doesn't exist. If you will use them passively, they will vet slowly, if you use them together with other units, they won't have problems vetting. Re.E vet 1 bonus of 20% accuracy is great so is the 5 man a vet 3 (probably some of the top in game), contrary to your claim. You are entitled to you opinion. I am glad that you reach SP vet 4-5 reliably, pls provide replays with your games. If you currently do not have one pls record one next time. I did not dig out any problems OP did, so pls cut down on the personal comments it a near year and chance to be less personal in the forums. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sturmpionier 1 Jan 2019, 10:22 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Jan 2019, 09:53 AMKatitof Because builder/repair units do not have great veternacy as they are not primarily combat units. /thread That simply untrue both Re.E and Ro.E get combat bonuses even from vet 1, great fighting bonuses and are useful in fights. Even SP get good fighting bonuses, they simply vet way too slow and lose badly to upgunned allied infantry. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wishlist for 20191 Jan 2019, 01:45 AM a non toxic forum In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Feelings after the Decemberpatch31 Dec 2018, 16:59 PM Jump back to quoted post31 Dec 2018, 16:45 PMLoopDloop I agree that assgrens need better scaling, but remember that as a 0cp unit (talking early game) they have a lot more combat potential than just their mp40s because of grenade assaults and sprint. Assault engineers just have to rely on solely dps and the flamer (which would be locked behind officer probably in the future) so they should be a bit stronger in dps. Assault engineers scale way better in live though, and again I definitely agree that assgrens could use like an stg upgrade or something. Smoke grenades at like vet2 would be nice too if they don't already have them (I never use them cuz they suck so I don't know whether they do or not lol). No they do not assault grenades is locked behind PB 1 and comes late. The unit should either get some weapon upgrades or buffed and moved to higher CP. Assault engineer are problematic because of their durability DPS, how flamers work,of mines,of their utility and because of their synergy with USF light vehicles. 5 men with flamers are bad to begin with even worse when available this early. In: Lobby
Thread: Feelings after the Decemberpatch31 Dec 2018, 16:35 PM Jump back to quoted post31 Dec 2018, 11:45 AMSander93 ...Also very true, although I think that's mainly because Assault Grenadiers simply haven't been looked at for a very long time and have become very underpowered with all the other units around them being buffed. Imo assault grenadiers are about a proper level for a CP 0 unit for the time frame (maybe a bit more durable). On the other hand they scale terribly and they should either get a weapon upgrade like 3 ST44 or have very good vet bonuses including lower reinforcement cost or some sort of late AT grenade lock behind BP 2 so that they can remain relevant. In: Lobby
Thread: Feelings after the Decemberpatch31 Dec 2018, 14:30 PM Jump back to quoted post31 Dec 2018, 13:47 PMLago I really don't like inconsistencies in the visual language of the game. I was overjoyed when they gave the Churchill Crocodile's main gun the same damage as a normal Churchill, and I'd fastly prefer to keep the KV-8's durability the same as the KV-1. Having two identical tanks have such wildly different durabilities was a bit jarring. ... Well achieving both consistency and balance is very difficult. Ostwind and PzIV have the same chassis for instance...Balance should come first consistency second. Jump back to quoted post31 Dec 2018, 13:47 PMLago Therefore, if you were trying to make the KV-8 a standard anti-infantry-only flame tank, I'd probably do it by removing its anti-armour gun entirely rather than adjusting its durability. That'd keep it as a highly durable anti-infantry breakthrough unit, but would make even a Puma a hard counter to it. I'm not sure where that'd leave its cost, although my gut says around 125ish FU. I agree, I would rather have be durable and less lethal and the main gun could remain to fend of light vehicles (being harassed by 222 would feel wrong). Puma is a curios case since it has trouble with some AI tank like KV-8/Centaur, maybe reduce the rear armor a bit so it can penetrate when it flanks it. The durability could actually move to veterancy so the unit has less shock value if cheaper but scales better so that it can remain relevant. The unit should lose unsupported to a PzIV. As for price one could even go lower to even 100-110 it the DOT is removed. It should also not be available in commanders with super heavies, that would help balancing it allot. In: Lobby