Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: USA September patch discussion6 Sep 2019, 15:18 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Sep 2019, 13:50 PMMazianni I'll take that in good faith and assume you feel the same about FG-42s and G43s. In any case, why not just edit the moving stats? Like the absurd 0.1 cooldown modifier on the move could be made 0.5. Movement accuracy to 0.6. Etc. Most people aren't constantly moving their infantry around. G43 moving accuracy is too high but this is different subject and F42 is an "elite" weapon but imo it need to get a non linear curve and imo it should be limited to 1-2. Point here is that BARs makes great at all Riflemen at all ranges and on the move. What I am suggesting is making the weapon good at MID range so that riflemen do not bully LMG grenadiers at far nor will get get bullied by PGs at mid, for a lower cost. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USA September patch discussion6 Sep 2019, 13:41 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Sep 2019, 13:18 PMMazianni Do you consider the BAR overpowered or not? Yes it is. Its long DPS is too high for a weapon that can be fired on the move. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USA September patch discussion6 Sep 2019, 13:17 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Sep 2019, 13:10 PMMazianni The STG is also 42% better at range 15. The comparison was and remains valid for the point being made. It like saying an smg is as good as carbine. The weapon simply have different profiles and the comparison is misleading. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USA September patch discussion6 Sep 2019, 13:16 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Sep 2019, 13:09 PMaddvaluejack I think this should be "1 Bar + 1 M1 > 2 Volks STG". VG ST44 should be scraped since they are good at all ranges or redesigned to be used in semi auto MOD giving them a profile of a "carbine" (around Garand level). Then they could be 5 of them. As an timed ability costing MU one could add full auto mode. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Should Light Gammon bombs/bundles level wooden buildings?6 Sep 2019, 13:09 PM That is why I have suggested 2 type of grenades: Offensive one, and defensive one Offensive one would less damage but have bonus modifiers vs heavy cover and garrison. In addition they would to a small stun 1-2 secs in large area to prevent unit from hoping back in buildings. The defensive would work current ones. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: USA September patch discussion6 Sep 2019, 13:06 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Sep 2019, 13:00 PMMazianni I mentioned PzGrens, not Volks. The Bar is better at long range where ST44 completely drops off , while the ST44 is around x117% at range 0. Its about x374% times better max range. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USA September patch discussion6 Sep 2019, 12:57 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Sep 2019, 12:31 PMMazianni BAR is basically comparable to a single PzGren Stg44, but locked behind tech and costing 60muni a piece. I don't know why anyone would ask for a nerf to them or RM's ability to carry BARs. I don't know why anyone thinks REs need work either. They're shit early game but scale better than any of the eastern front engineer units at least. If I had to buff them I'd make the 5 man bonus come at vet 2 instead of 3, but that's it. They're really fine as is. Why not talk about units that actually need to be worked on, like the Pack Howie or the M2HB with it's still not fixed 0.5 retreat RA. Check your number they are completely off. Pg's St44 and BAR have completely different curves. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USA September patch discussion6 Sep 2019, 12:23 PM Imo BAR should become more mid oriented cost lowered to 45 and DPS adjusted. That would keep the relative positioning similar. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wehrmacht September patch discussion6 Sep 2019, 10:43 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Sep 2019, 10:39 AMSmartie +1 Thats exactly what i suggested 2 weeks before. Imo its a no brainer- you would buff the base version of the 251 without making the flamethrower version stronger. Then credits to you. Funny thing is that I had suggested that 221 to 222 should cost manpower and fuel (when the unit was available and imo it should become available again) but I was told that upgrades cost MU. Then suddenly 221 to 223 cost MP/FU and dozer too. Since this road has been opened imo it should be applied to more units like m20 or even stug-e to Stug-g or panzer D to panzer H/J or m20 to ground hound or m3 lower fuel cost but can not fire from inside that would require a fuel upgrade or the WC carrier requiring fuel for wasp and Vickers. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wehrmacht September patch discussion6 Sep 2019, 10:11 AM How lowering the price of the 251 HT and making the upgrade to FHT cost manpower and fuel. That can help the balance both unit better. In addition make the heal an active vet 1 ability that heal faster but has CD and move the shcu mine to riegel command ability for 222 and 251 and the riegel to pioneed. In: COH2 Balance