Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Tommy shouldn't have received the moving accuracy buff20 Apr 2020, 11:08 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Apr 2020, 10:59 AMT.R. Stormjäger It has failed because it's impossible to balance. You either get the previous patch Sections which are OP in cover and trash out of cover and the faction is UP, or the current patch sections which are OP in cover and good out of cover and the faction is OP. Just turn them into normal infantry and properly balance them, everyone will be happy to see that. Tommies cover bonus can be salvaged and it is not the cause of problem, it work for ostruppen for instance. The rout of problem lies more to all the nobrainer upgrade tommies have available to them like bolster/medic/pyro weapon upgrades. UKF would become allot more easier to balance if this buffes become side-grades instead of upgrade. For instance: Bolster becomes a individual upgrade taking up a weapons while tommies have cost reduce to 260 Pyro becomes an upgrade giving scope Enfields and taking up all slot while removing cover mechanism Medic upgrade replace one entity with medic armed with a pistol and so on In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The CoHrona Cup - a 1v1 CoH2 Tournament20 Apr 2020, 09:15 AM well done everyone In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Someone have use the M20 lately?20 Apr 2020, 09:10 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Apr 2020, 09:04 AMAarotron I mean you could make it so the crew has to upgrade bazookas instead of being free. The lack of reliable at in lt is already quite considerable,id have x2 bazooka as upgrade option. AT get bazooka, AP rounds for 0.50, AT mines and Stuart. It has enough option and that is why it is prefer over Cap. Finally captain unlock is rather cheap so are bazooka unlock. There is no real need for double bazooka crew. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Comments on Cohrona Cup 2020 - please share!20 Apr 2020, 09:01 AM If syphonX will be as kind as to provide some stat that would be very very helpful. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Someone have use the M20 lately?20 Apr 2020, 08:02 AM I used even in 4v4. One gets great sight, 40 range, mines, smoke and even a AA hmg. Although there are some changes that I would like to see like making the upgrade cost fuel and manpower instead mu. I personally find it be better than the doctrinal 221. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Ostwind causing a power spike for Ost?19 Apr 2020, 11:38 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Apr 2020, 11:19 AMFire and Terror It just got buffed, so it's not worthless and now you want to nerf it again. Just let it be, its strong yes, but its barly an issue if you can manage to field a medium tank against it. It's armor isnt that great either, gets penetrated by things like ptrs, bazookas or Stuart quite often There is difference between nerfing and reducing the power level. Point here is that the patches tend to make units increasingly more powerful and many times more expensive and this is step in the wrong direction. Unit do not need to game changing to be useful. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Axis factions get worse with every patch19 Apr 2020, 10:50 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Apr 2020, 10:34 AMT.R. Stormjäger I agree and I believe this is all a symptom of the LMG42 upgrade, since you can’t buff early game Grens without making them OP later once they get their hands on the LMG42. In my view the upgrade should be a specialization instead of a mandatory upgrade, with 4 kar98 Grens being viable on their own and the LMG42 being an ulgrade like Brens are for Sections. This would mean decreasing the power level of the lmg42 and increasing the power level of kar98s. This would help out T1 openings for Ostheer, tone down LMG42 blobs and reduce munitions usage which would then allow more mines. Or one can leave ostheer alone and nerf the other factions. One simply has to stop the power creep. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostwind causing a power spike for Ost?19 Apr 2020, 09:15 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Apr 2020, 09:11 AMFire and Terror So why is Ostwind timing a problem?, it's basically only 20 fuel and 50 mp cheaper than a p4 Actually I would try reducing the power level of the unit. Price could go down to be about the same or lower than T-34/76 and the damage output adjusted accordingly. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostwind causing a power spike for Ost?19 Apr 2020, 08:41 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Apr 2020, 08:29 AMmrgame2 It is fast and it hits infantry too well. If you are usf, how you deal with a fast Ostwind? I watched the 1v1 games, Ostwind seems unstoppable in the timings given! It does not use accuracy to hit infatry. You are talking about scatter hits...but I doubt it is that good even vs infatry in on the move. It seem to be inferior to T-70 while moving. Ostwind is good when stationary. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostwind causing a power spike for Ost?19 Apr 2020, 08:09 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Apr 2020, 08:00 AMmrgame2 It comes rather too early! Basically meta is shifting from Ostwind > T70 > Luch now! Especially against USF and Ukf? Soviet can throw a cheaper T70 and T34/76. AEC can help somewhat. Ostwind needs less accuracy on the move. Ostwind has lousy accuracy on the move it hardly hit vehicles when moving. In: COH2 Balance