Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Target size of Hetzer is 15???17 Apr 2020, 11:33 AM Regardless of target size Hezter gets hit by many more collision than T-70 because it is case mate and has to face enemy units. There is nothing wrong the target size of the unit or the target size of the T-70. In: Lobby
Thread: ISU152 vs Elefant - harder to kill an ISU15217 Apr 2020, 11:21 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Apr 2020, 11:17 AMHannibal That is actually true, I forgot the deflection damage. Will redo it, potentially this evening if I find the time How are deflection shots implemented? As straight values or percentage of the base damage? I know for the ISU it should be 120 smg per shot percentage of core base damage AP has 120 deflection damage HE has 40 deflection damage Skill shot has 80 although it has high penetration values and few units can bounce it. If I remember correctly skill shot can also be used to reduce TTK if used after first shot since it has lower reload. ISU-152 is probably good AT vs up to including the Panther and vs higher armored the skill shot and 120 deflection damage is not bad either. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: ISU152 vs Elefant - harder to kill an ISU15217 Apr 2020, 10:47 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Apr 2020, 10:39 AMHannibal I used my simulation to let every of these units shoot at a Sherman, All tanks needed about 4 shots to kill it, which would give the ISU a TTK of 31,3 s and Elefant Jagdtiger about 26,7 s. Against a heavy: Elefant -> IS-2: 4,7 shots or 32,8 s ISU -> Tiger: 8,5 shots or 77,8 s All sims done at range 70 and only frontal hits allowed. Now bear in mind I do not have the in-game hitboxes for scatter shots, so I used the real life tank sizes. Actual numbers might differ a bit. But it is also true that 77% of the shots are natural shots/hits which are simulated correctly. And even of all the scatter shots most should be simulated correctly. So even if these numbers are not 100% like in-game, they are not far from it. Conclusion: Using the ISU against heavy tanks is an absolute waste Think your number might be off, I think did not calculate deflection damage and skill shots for ISU-152. Another factor is mark target which would increase the capability of the ISU-152 especially vs Tigers. Another interesting point is that Elefant is only x117% better than ISU-152 vs mediums according to numbers. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Fixing Vehicle Balance with Non-Linear Target Size Scaling17 Apr 2020, 07:31 AM The suggestion I have made year ago seem allot easier to implement imo. https://www.coh2.org/topic/68297/super-heavies-td-overhaul-mod Instead of messing up with all value of target size and accuracy one only changes super heavies. The idea is that Super heavies get super size. Unit that meant to hard counter super heavies get switchable rounds that are separately balance to deal with them with low accuracy high penetration and damage ROF accordingly. Another point worth mentioning is that ROF for most vehicles is not effected by range. If one make ROF changes with range one can make some unit gain more advantages from closing in. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: ISU152 vs Elefant - harder to kill an ISU15216 Apr 2020, 17:16 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Apr 2020, 17:00 PMSander93 ... The SU-85 needs about 45s to kill a Tiger I. The Elefant needs 26,4s to kill an IS-2. At vet 3 the SU-85 needs about 27,4s while the Elefant needs 15s. The Elefant has far superior DPM, although it mostly loses the advantage against 640hp vehicles because it needs to deal significant overkill damage and needs a third shot to deal the last 40 damage. But as I've said, in case both are supported by infantry who can deal even a single snare worth of damage, the Elefant can kill even medium vehicles almost twice as fast. Comparing a vet 3 Elefant and vet 3 su-85 is rather misleading since the a Vet 3 Elehant is more like unicorn. In addition the numbers are bit inflated due to the chance to miss for the Elefant and difficulty to truck targets when moving. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: ISU152 vs Elefant - harder to kill an ISU15216 Apr 2020, 16:53 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Apr 2020, 16:28 PMSander93 But it's worse at AT than the SU-85. Its TTK against both medium vehicles (at vet 0 17s for the SU-85 vs 20,5s for the ISU-152 against an Ostheer P4, counted from the first shot and disregarding accuracy) and against heavies (45,2s vs 51,25s against a Tiger I) is longer and the SU-85 gets even better with veterancy. Its actual AT performance is decent at best, although of course being able to switch in the first place is significantly better than nothing and does help its versatility. That is because SU-85 is op. SU-85 is probably superior to Elephant vs mediums, possibly vs Tiger once vetted. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Rear Echelon very weak.16 Apr 2020, 13:47 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Apr 2020, 13:31 PMLoren I feel that volly fire is totally trash. The penalty is so severe that it's almost a suicide ability. abilities such as tactical advance have penalties, but this ability can be controlled to some extent during use. But volly fire cannot do anything during use it. I think it's a good idea to ease the penalty for this ability. try using the ability while in garrison In: COH2 Balance
Thread: ISU152 vs Elefant - harder to kill an ISU15216 Apr 2020, 13:14 PM Certain vehicles should have their rear armored lowered while other should have their rear armored increased. ISU fall under the first category. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Winter patch Buglist 16 Apr 2020, 12:14 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Apr 2020, 11:35 AM\|GB\| The Lnt.599 The centaur vet 1 ability doesnt target the area u select, ussualy ignores it and does some sort of banana area xD This is not bug. In the old implementation one had to a manual targeting for the ability to continue firing so now it does automatically. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Plane crash16 Apr 2020, 10:44 AM Rng is good but not at this level: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2JnVRJCGps&feature=emb_logo In: COH2 Balance