Profile of Aarotron

Jump back to quoted post12 Mar 2020, 03:03 AMCODGUY

All of these points are so laughably bad and easily deconstructed I don't even know where to begin.


Lets start with using correct terminology first. You're referring to the non-docrinal M4A3 75mm Sherman getting the doctrinal dozer blade upgrade found on the also doctribal 105mm Sherman. The doctrinal 76mm Sherman doesn't get this upgrade. There is no 106mm Sherman.

The upgrade probably brings it on par with a standard Wehrmacht Panzer IV, with the Pamzer IV having a better gun while the dozer Sherman has better armor and health. The cost of the Dozer Sherman exceeds that of the OST P4. The vehicle is still greatly inferior to the OKW P4J as well as a Vet 2 OST P4. It is simply no match for a Panther which goes without saying, and neither is any USF vehicle besides the Pershing and even that is 50/50.

The AP/HE shell mechanic is inferior to the P4's main gun being effective against all targets without the need to waste time switching ammo. This is especially true for the P4J.

The Dozer Sherman, like any Sherman, is easily countered by properly placed AT guns or Stugs, and also any double Shreck sqauds out there.

It's rather amusing to see people have trouble against this little tank with it's little dozer blade.

Jump back to quoted post11 Mar 2020, 10:50 AMLeo251

The same thing could apply to Grens, but here we are, still with 4men.


So, the problem was Penals. Instead of nerfing penals, patch team buff cons.


The same thing could apply to Grens. 90% of player base has problems with 4men Gren squads.

Jump back to quoted post26 Feb 2020, 21:34 PMMazianni

[Ok, I actually agree Pathfinders are pretty pathetic tbh (I could have sworn they had 0.9 RA once, but at 1 RA they're squishy af with very little combat value), but they offer great sight and let you reinforce your paratrooper models in the field with beacons, so when going airborne or recon support they are more of an investment into future units than anything else.]