Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback28 Nov 2020, 15:10 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Nov 2020, 13:47 PMJibberJabberJobber .... It still stuns. .. One of the problem with current ram is that. The stun provides enough time to land an off map regardless if it penetrates or not. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback28 Nov 2020, 14:56 PM Since Soviet medic have been brought up how about allowing them to bought separately? 100 manpower buys the 1 medic and another 150 two more In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Can we please address OKW arty flares in new patch28 Nov 2020, 14:55 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Nov 2020, 14:51 PMthedarkarmadillo In the patch it can be called in in different directions (I don't agree with this change however) but in live it's a dice roll if it's going to pass where you need it. I play team allies frequently and know from experience that it's not as reliable as you are making it out to be. Flares on the other hand cannot be more reliable and that is not hyperbole. They LITERALLY cannot get more reliable. Not really, both planes can be aimed already. UKF planes can already be called from specific direction. The first major planes will fly form base to direction it called in and the second (vet 1) from enemy base to point it called. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Excessive Amount Of Micro Required For Brummbar28 Nov 2020, 14:48 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Nov 2020, 14:12 PMSerrith ... The dozer is a different unit. .. All units are different but have similar roles and dozer/Brumbar have similar and the latest changes to dozer brought the unit closer than ever before. The no really justification for such difference in projectile velocity between the 2 units especially since Dozer comes with turret and ready need less micro. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Can we please address OKW arty flares in new patch28 Nov 2020, 14:44 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Nov 2020, 14:29 PMSerrith Specifically in team games, flares synergize well with abilities that require continuous line of sight like zeroing artillery, something recon passes do not. The fact that flares have no obvious audio or minimap indicators makes them far harder to react to then single pass recons, and there's also the fact that the recon runs take time to arrive, while flares are near instantaneous. This can mean the difference between getting your troops spread out in time or eating a light artillery barrage. The problem is not reckon planes them selves but being stock. I have already said that the CD of flares need a massive increase but using flares and off map not only requires a specific but also a second one for the off. If in your opinion the problem is there is little warning from flares than simply add a warning. The stock reckon planes multiply the effectiveness of most UKF/USF off map. One wants to use P47/Typhoon loiter ? add the reckon planes and you get both vision and more to divert AA fire. My point is that reckon planes should not be available stock. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback28 Nov 2020, 13:24 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Nov 2020, 13:12 PMvonAsten ye agreed. They where not cost effective in T2 that is why they where moved in the first place. Unless they see a cost reduction to something like 300 they are not cost efficient in t2. I one insist on allowing these infantries so early one should follow the PF desing and have them cost 280/300 start with 2 ST and 2 K98 and have to buy the other 2 ST44. That could also help with g43/shrek In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Excessive Amount Of Micro Required For Brummbar28 Nov 2020, 13:23 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Nov 2020, 13:09 PMSerrith Why not? Because it a non constructive way of balancing things and difficult to explain to players, the same was suggested for ISU-152 (manual reloading) and it was rejected. And why should brumbar require micro and dozer not? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] Bug Reporting28 Nov 2020, 13:21 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Nov 2020, 12:47 PMHoneyCircle Churchill's commander upgrade seems to be making it less accurate vs inf. I tested this on the range map, both Churchill with no vet same range and one with commander upgrade vs volks in yellow cover, out of 10 tries. 9 times the Churchill with no commander upgrade wipe the volk squad first at a much faster speed. Seems like the upgrade is reducing the churchill's accuracy for some reason commander affect accuracy not scatter you should test vs vehicles not infatry In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] General Discussion28 Nov 2020, 12:38 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Nov 2020, 12:33 PMOrangePest ...If you want the 1v1 meta to stop being stale, then you simply have to buff them. There isn't any other solution that really exists for it. Or simply stop the power creep and nerf the allied infatry instead, since Grenadier have already received buffs... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] General Discussion28 Nov 2020, 12:22 PM Damage of certain weapon vs ambient buildings need to be looked at that includes: Ostwind, zis/Su-76 barrage, Pack howizter In: COH2 Balance